Code Based Repeater for ASP.NET MVC

Why not join our community?, there are 19 users online

home
asp.net
view story

DotNetKick.com is an open-source project. Please report any bugs and let us know your great suggestions. Currently running svn revision 620 (rss)

Kick Spy!, Kick Zeitgeist and Kick Widgets

19
kicks

kick it

Code Based Repeater for ASP.NET MVC

published 3 months, 3 days ago, submitted by

alley 3 months, 4 days ago

haacked.com — A foreach loop doesn’t help you handle alternating items, for example. My response to this story is, “The foreach loop is not our repeater control. Our repeater control is an iterating extension method with lambdas!”. Because who doesn’t love lambdas?

2 comments | category:

ASP.NET | Views: 16 | Get KickIt image code

tags: MVC, ASP.NET, repeater, ASPNETMVC | tag it

Everyones tags:

Your tags:

Please login or signup.

Add a live kick counter to your blog >> liveImage

You can even customize the image by choosing your own colors, and then clicking the button below to update the preview and the html code:

"Kick It" text
"Kick It" background
kick count text
kick count background
border

Simply copy and paste this HTML into your blog post.

Users who kicked this story:

alley -

CVertex - TestAccount -

adminjew -

bradygaster -

rimsystems -

dengar007 -

samAdams -

crpietschmann -

drmohundro -

Jemm - blisteringlunatic -

mdopp - khushal999p - adron - rodiniz - andersronne - z2bass - cprobert

Comments:

Really really nice.

I can see some awesome helpers coming out for MVC

posted by

CVertex 3 months, 4 days ago

I hope this article doesn't cause too much confusion for MVC learners (such as myself). It is mostly an experimental/prototypical exercise by Phil. Granted, it would be useful cases where <asp:Repeater /> doesn't haack it.

Phil even admits: "It turns out that the regular <asp:Repeater /> control works just fine with ASP.NET MVC, so there’s no need for such an ugly method call. I just thought it was fun to try out and provides an alternative approach that doesn’t require databinding."

posted by

powerrush 2 months, 26 days ago