Please leave comments/corrections/criticisms on the article here, thanks! Sam

I'd love to, but all I get is "The XML page cannot be displayed" when I go to the article.

Here's the google cache:

http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:A_EoThwpUrcJ:dotnetperls.com/Content/Struct-Examples.aspx+struct&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

ah excellent, thanks!

Be aware of the overheads and semantics of passing structs into methods, e.g.

public void SetDetails(Employee a)
{
a.Name = "Bob";
a.Age = 30;
}

Will work fine where Employee is a class but will appear to do nothing if it is a struct as they are passed by value not reference so the original object will not be changed. It also means the entire struct will be pushed onto the stack value by value not just the memory pointer which may have performance overheads especially in recursive code.

If you are going to use structs you may want to consider making the objects immutable, i.e. they never change value once instantiated but instead create new versions. This is what many of the value types (structs) in .NET already do, e.g. DateTime.Now.AddDays(1) doesn't modify Now, it creates a new instance from it.

[)amien

Good comment Damien. It would be good for me to add a part about the out and ref keywords with structs.

It would be neat to test at what point passing by value becomes less efficient than by reference.

I really liked this article. Thanks!

I'm glad you liked it Andrew! Thanks

Another implication of the stack versus heap issue might be surprising to some. Consider the following:
I declare a struct:

struct A
{
public bool B;
}

Now guess what will happen if try to use it as follows:

A a = new A(); // Create an instance.
List<A> list = new List<A>();
list.Add(a); // Add to a list.
list[0].B = false; // Change the bool value.

What happens is compilation error on the last line! The error will not happen if I use class instead of struct:

class A
{
public bool B;
}


Have a nice day.
;)

Regev, that's a good point. I pasted your code into VS and it complains about "not a variable". Coming from C it is a bit confusing to me.

I hope to add some material from the comments soon.