StringBuilder is not always faster

Why not join our community?, there are 5 users online

home
c#
view story

DotNetKick.com is an open-source project. Please report any bugs and let us know your great suggestions. Currently running svn revision 620 (rss)

Kick Spy!, Kick Zeitgeist and Kick Widgets

26
kicks

kick it

StringBuilder is not always faster - Part 2

published 1 year ago, submitted by chinhdo 1 year ago

chinhdo.com — n a previous article (”StringBuilder is not always faster), I provided some quick benchmark data and gave “rules of thumb” for when to use StringBuilder and when to use traditional string concatenations. In this follow-up article, I will attempt to provide a more detailed analysis.

3 comments | category:

C# | Views: 1 | Get KickIt image code

tags: StringBuilder, C# | tag it

Everyones tags:

Your tags:

Please login or signup.

Add a live kick counter to your blog >> liveImage

You can even customize the image by choosing your own colors, and then clicking the button below to update the preview and the html code:

"Kick It" text
"Kick It" background
kick count text
kick count background
border

Simply copy and paste this HTML into your blog post.

Users who kicked this story:

chinhdo -

gavinjoyce -

diamondz -

ElementCy -

jamesewelch - BabyCoder - MarthaBass -

cdjaco - mboyda - Cyonix - Aaronontheweb - cbenien - jdellig -

kayos - ashithmr - rocjoe71 - dawtips -

mdopp - csharpnjava -

mastermaq - vbnotebook - hl7coder - pavel - jakub.sturc - Zero3 -

armencz

Comments:

Nice follow up

posted by

jamesewelch 1 year ago

I actually factored the concerns and benchmarks you posted into my Facebook application since I was a bit concerned about concatenation operations presenting a scalability problem. Thanks for the great post!

posted by Aaronontheweb 1 year ago

Aaron: Great! Glad I could help :-)

posted by chinhdo 1 year ago