The most useful .NET utility classes developers tend to reinvent

Why not join our community?, there are 18 users online

home
c#
view story

DotNetKick.com is an open-source project. Please report any bugs and let us know your great suggestions. Currently running svn revision 620 (rss)

Kick Spy!, Kick Zeitgeist and Kick Widgets

23
kicks

kick it

The most useful .NET utility classes developers tend to reinvent

published 1 year, 3 months ago, submitted by markheath 1 year, 3 months ago

haacked.com — Some useful .NET utility classes you may mave missed

4 comments | category:

C# | Views: 2 | Get KickIt image code

tags: Haacked, .Net, Tips | tag it

Everyones tags:

Your tags:

Please login or signup.

Add a live kick counter to your blog >> liveImage

You can even customize the image by choosing your own colors, and then clicking the button below to update the preview and the html code:

"Kick It" text
"Kick It" background
kick count text
kick count background
border

Simply copy and paste this HTML into your blog post.

Users who kicked this story:

markheath - RobChappel - chaks7 -

gavinjoyce - Reman -

korayem -

eggs -

tiernano - ranyaof - MarthaBass -

dove - ashithmr -

RossCode - Haacked -

ussherm - edburdo -

w3stfa11 - steele27 -

salim - csharpnjava -

docluv - jsedlak - MHamilton

Comments:

This was posted 12 days ago on this very site making the front page http://haacked.com/archive/2007/06/13/the-most-useful-.net-utility-classes-developers-tend-to-reinvent.aspx

DNK really needs a duplicate URL check or users who can be bothered to check.

posted by

DamienG 1 year, 3 months ago

This place is becoming like digg ;)

posted by

gavinjoyce 1 year, 3 months ago

At the very least, url validation should be in place - like a unique constraint on a column maybe?

posted by mikeon 1 year, 3 months ago

I would like to inform the user submitting the story if a story with a similar URL exists allowing them to make an informed decision. I don't want to impose a strict unique URL policy as sometimes it is valid for a URL to be submitted twice.

posted by

gavinjoyce 1 year, 3 months ago