<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com - Stories tagged with Bullshit</title>
    <description>the latest stories tagged with 'Bullshit' from DotNetKicks.com</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Dependency Injection is Dead! </title>
      <description>The author claims that AOP-assisted Dependency Resolution, where dependencies are resolved on-demand without plumbing code and use of factories, can supersede Dependency Injection... at least in some scenarios. A refreshing view on a topic that tends to become sanctified and therefore undiscussed in our community.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2fsimonince%2farchive%2f2008%2f06%2f30%2fdependency-injection-is-dead.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2fsimonince%2farchive%2f2008%2f06%2f30%2fdependency-injection-is-dead.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Dependency_Injection_is_Dead</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Dependency_Injection_is_Dead</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:46:10 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Performance: IEnumerable&amp;lt;&amp;gt;.Sum</title>
      <description>A article about the performance hit created by the IEnumerable&amp;lt;&amp;gt;.Sum extension method!!! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdotnet.org.za%2frudi%2farchive%2f2008%2f06%2f19%2fperformance-ienumerable-lt-gt-sum.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdotnet.org.za%2frudi%2farchive%2f2008%2f06%2f19%2fperformance-ienumerable-lt-gt-sum.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Performance_IEnumerable_Sum</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Performance_IEnumerable_Sum</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Object Oriented Programming has Failed Us</title>
      <description>I've been thinking about the state of the programmers coming into our industry recently.  It seems to me that many of the college students who graduate today understand the syntax, but few know how to apply true object oriented principles to the real world. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.dmbcllc.com%2f2008%2f05%2f13%2fobject-oriented-programming-has-failed-us%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.dmbcllc.com%2f2008%2f05%2f13%2fobject-oriented-programming-has-failed-us%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Object_Oriented_Programming_has_Failed_Us</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Object_Oriented_Programming_has_Failed_Us</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:20:17 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is the ADO.NET Team Abandoning LINQ to SQL?</title>
      <description>Roger Jennings, eagle-eyed reporter of all things LINQ/ADO.NET/EF, describes why LINQ to SQL appears to be approaching legacy product status, with promised features unlikely to ever ship. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2foakleafblog.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f05%2fis-adonet-team-abandoning-linq-to-sql.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2foakleafblog.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f05%2fis-adonet-team-abandoning-linq-to-sql.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/Is_the_ADO_NET_Team_Abandoning_LINQ_to_SQL</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/Is_the_ADO_NET_Team_Abandoning_LINQ_to_SQL</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 17:46:07 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET: officially unmaintainable</title>
      <description>+1 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fjimmy_bogard%2farchive%2f2008%2f05%2f18%2fasp-net-officially-unmaintainable.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fjimmy_bogard%2farchive%2f2008%2f05%2f18%2fasp-net-officially-unmaintainable.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_officially_unmaintainable</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_officially_unmaintainable</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:16:05 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are Scott Guthrie and Scott Hanselman the same person?</title>
      <description>The Guthrie/Hanselman Conspiracy &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.troyd.net%2fAre%2bScott%2bGuthrie%2bAnd%2bScott%2bHanselman%2bThe%2bSame%2bPerson.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.troyd.net%2fAre%2bScott%2bGuthrie%2bAnd%2bScott%2bHanselman%2bThe%2bSame%2bPerson.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Are_Scott_Guthrie_and_Scott_Hanselman_the_same_person</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Are_Scott_Guthrie_and_Scott_Hanselman_the_same_person</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:43:47 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do you really need a data access layer with LINQ?</title>
      <description>Some thoughts on skipping the creation of a data access layer in a web application that uses LINQ for all of its database access. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ytechie.com%2f2008%2f05%2fdo-you-really-need-a-data-access-layer-with-linq.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ytechie.com%2f2008%2f05%2fdo-you-really-need-a-data-access-layer-with-linq.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/linq/Do_you_really_need_a_data_access_layer_with_LINQ</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/linq/Do_you_really_need_a_data_access_layer_with_LINQ</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wake up ASP.NET developers!</title>
      <description>You're participating in the stagnation of the World Wide Web and you hold the human race hostage. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.madskristensen.dk%2fpost%2fWake-up-ASPNET-developers.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.madskristensen.dk%2fpost%2fWake-up-ASPNET-developers.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Wake_up_ASP_NET_developers</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Wake_up_ASP_NET_developers</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 19:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Don't Use Double.Nan</title>
      <description>Comparison of a double with double.Nan (Not a Number) will always return false. If we want to check whether a specific double is... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dev102.com%2f2008%2f04%2f18%2fdont-use-doublenan%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dev102.com%2f2008%2f04%2f18%2fdont-use-doublenan%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Don_t_Use_Double_Nan</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Don_t_Use_Double_Nan</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dependency Injection Not Needed In C#</title>
      <description>We do not need Dependency Injection in C# 3.0. Because we already have it in a very cleaner way!... (Using extension methods in a different way to make everything inside-out!) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fhcoding.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f04%2fdependency-injection-not-needed-in-c.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fhcoding.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f04%2fdependency-injection-not-needed-in-c.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Dependency_Injection_Not_Needed_In_C</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Dependency_Injection_Not_Needed_In_C</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:32:23 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Firefox Extensions Any Web Developer Must Have</title>
      <description>5 plug-ins to firefox all you developers must know and use &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dev102.com%2f2008%2f03%2f30%2f5-firefox-extensions-any-web-developer-must-have%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dev102.com%2f2008%2f03%2f30%2f5-firefox-extensions-any-web-developer-must-have%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/5_Firefox_Extensions_Any_Web_Developer_Must_Have</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/5_Firefox_Extensions_Any_Web_Developer_Must_Have</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:31:05 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Things I Hate About .NET </title>
      <description>What are some of the most annoying things about programming in .NET? See what I think and how to overcome them. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fprofessionalaspnet.com%2farchive%2f2008%2f03%2f30%2fThings-I-Hate-About-.NET.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fprofessionalaspnet.com%2farchive%2f2008%2f03%2f30%2fThings-I-Hate-About-.NET.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Things_I_Hate_About_NET</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Things_I_Hate_About_NET</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:31:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Convert.ToInt32 Might be Dangerous</title>
      <description>Casting float to int is interesting. Not only it causes the value to get truncated, but it also changes binary representation. When you want to cast float to int you have two options: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.devmuse.com%2f2008%2f03%2f19%2fconverttoint32-vs-cast%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.devmuse.com%2f2008%2f03%2f19%2fconverttoint32-vs-cast%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Why_Convert_ToInt32_Might_be_Dangerous</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Why_Convert_ToInt32_Might_be_Dangerous</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 23:16:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why asp.net MVC is so awesome.</title>
      <description>The number one reason why asp.net MVC is the best thing ever. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2008%2f02%2fWhy-aspnet-MVC-is-so-awesome.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2008%2f02%2fWhy-aspnet-MVC-is-so-awesome.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Why_asp_net_MVC_is_so_awesome</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Why_asp_net_MVC_is_so_awesome</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:16:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why asp.net MVC is so awesome.</title>
      <description>The number one reason why asp.net MVC is the best thing ever. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2008%2f02%2fWhy-aspnet-MVC-is-so-awesome.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2008%2f02%2fWhy-aspnet-MVC-is-so-awesome.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Why_asp_net_MVC_is_so_awesome</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Why_asp_net_MVC_is_so_awesome</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:16:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Writing Maintainable Code Considered Harmful</title>
      <description>Reasons on why developers should not write maintainable code &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fitscommonsensestupid.blogspot.com%2f2007%2f11%2fsmelly-code.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fitscommonsensestupid.blogspot.com%2f2007%2f11%2fsmelly-code.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/tipsandtricks/Writing_Maintainable_Code_Considered_Harmful</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/tipsandtricks/Writing_Maintainable_Code_Considered_Harmful</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Try/Catch Blocks Can Hurt Performance Significantly</title>
      <description>Over at Programmers Heaven.com, there's an interesting article on the potential performance impact of try/catch blocks. The article concluded that the average cost of a try/catch block is essentially nothing (sorry there's no author information on the post), and that .NET/C# programmers should not think twice about using try/catch blocks. The author is right that a try/catch block has essentially zero cost. However, like most coding performance issues, exceptions and try/catch blocks do not have performance implications until they occur in some type of loop. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.chinhdo.com%2f20080226%2ftry-catch-blocks-performance%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.chinhdo.com%2f20080226%2ftry-catch-blocks-performance%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Try_Catch_Blocks_Can_Hurt_Performance_Significantly</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Try_Catch_Blocks_Can_Hurt_Performance_Significantly</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Extracting Icons from Files</title>
      <description>Extracting the icon of any file including executable ones. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.amrelsehemy.net%2fpost%2f2008%2f02%2fExtracting-Icons-from-Files.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.amrelsehemy.net%2fpost%2f2008%2f02%2fExtracting-Icons-from-Files.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/winforms/Extracting_Icons_from_Files</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/winforms/Extracting_Icons_from_Files</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:46:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do Not Learn Ruby</title>
      <description>A tongue in cheek essay on the perils of learning Ruby. You've been warned: do not learn Ruby! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwebmat.wordpress.com%2f2008%2f02%2f20%2fdo-not-learn-ruby%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwebmat.wordpress.com%2f2008%2f02%2f20%2fdo-not-learn-ruby%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Do_Not_Learn_Ruby</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Do_Not_Learn_Ruby</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Best VS Fonts and Settings EVER</title>
      <description>Okay the title is a bit over the top :)  Recently I was playing around with the vs settings after reading Scott Hanselman's article on black/white IDE colors and came up with this.  Take a look and let me know what you think. Maybe it will be your new color scheme in VS... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.frickinsweet.com%2fryanlanciaux.com%2fpost%2fBest-VS-Fonts--Colors-EVER.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.frickinsweet.com%2fryanlanciaux.com%2fpost%2fBest-VS-Fonts--Colors-EVER.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Best_VS_Fonts_and_Settings_EVER</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Best_VS_Fonts_and_Settings_EVER</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Extension Methods Suck</title>
      <description>The title says it all! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2007%2f12%2fExtension-Methods-Suck.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2007%2f12%2fExtension-Methods-Suck.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Extension_Methods_Suck</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Extension_Methods_Suck</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:01:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>