By tag: Coverage
0
kicks
The Meaning of 100% Test Coverage
The Myth that 100% test coverage means code is completely bug-free has been busted thoroughly. So much in fact, that it is almost risqué to add complete test coverage to your agenda. But is 100% test coverage really 100% useless, or are there some advantages worth striving for still? This artic...
0
kicks
100% Unit Testable Linq To Sql Repository - Kazi Manzur Rashid's Blog
In this post, I will show you how you can architect your Linq To Sql repository which will have 100% code coverage. I will use our favorite Northwind database along with my ongoing UnityCommonServiceLocatorMVC project. First, lets add a Linq To Sql diagram in our project and drag n drop the Category...
0
kicks
Integrate PartCover.Net, Nant and Cruise Control.Net
How to run PartCover with Nant, generate an xml report and integrate the report into CC.Net to get your coverage statistics in your Integration server.
0
kicks
Unit Testing and Code Coverage - A Powerful Duo
Unit testing (using NUnit) and code coverage (using NCoverExplorer) make an amazing combination to not only run unit tests, but see how well your tests execute your code. All of this is made even easier by the TestDriven.net Add-in for Visual Studio.
0
kicks
Part Cover a code coverage tool that works with Static methods
I just found this great free tool, open source, that produces xml, that has a command line interface and a nice GUI. Simple to install and start usint (less that five minutes). Why you should considered it and how it compares with Ncover.
0
kicks
If yer code ain't tested, the waterfallists win.
Move over Fox News, Guantanamo and Ashcroft aren't just for the news scroll anymore.
.NET is great, but there's a lot of really neat innovation going on in the Java-sphere even now. Two tools that take your TDD to a whole new level are on the horizon. Any bets on how long before they're re-impl...