<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com - Stories tagged with RhinoCommons</title>
    <description>the latest stories tagged with 'RhinoCommons' from DotNetKicks.com</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>System.Web.MVC, Rhino Commons, Castle Active Record, Nhibernate, Part </title>
      <description>Rhino.Commons, AR &amp;amp; NHibernate was the right decision for my project, but I've made a conscious effort to shield the MVC web site application from having any knowledge of their existence. This was done to achieve greater separation of layers and fewer direct dependecies. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmichaelhanney.com%2fblog%2f2008%2f05%2f27%2fsystemwebmvc-rhino-commons-caslte-active-record-nhibernate-part-2%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fmichaelhanney.com%2fblog%2f2008%2f05%2f27%2fsystemwebmvc-rhino-commons-caslte-active-record-nhibernate-part-2%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/System_Web_MVC_Rhino_Commons_Castle_Active_Record_Nhibernate_Part</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/System_Web_MVC_Rhino_Commons_Castle_Active_Record_Nhibernate_Part</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 10:29:45 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>