<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com - Stories tagged with SQLServer</title>
    <description>the latest stories tagged with 'SQLServer' from DotNetKicks.com</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Introduction to Table-Valued Parameters with Example</title>
      <description>Table-Valued Parameters is a new feature introduced in SQL SERVER 2008. In earlier versions of SQL SERVER it is not possible to pass a table variable in stored procedure as a parameter, but now in SQL SERVER 2008 we can use Table-Valued Parameter to send multiple rows of data to a stored procedure or a function without creating a temporary table or passing so many parameters.

This is one feature all the SQL Server developer were waiting for long time. This article explains how it can be used with very simple words. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.sqlauthority.com%2f2008%2f08%2f31%2fsql-server-table-valued-parameters-in-sql-server-2008%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.sqlauthority.com%2f2008%2f08%2f31%2fsql-server-table-valued-parameters-in-sql-server-2008%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/Introduction_to_Table_Valued_Parameters_with_Example</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/Introduction_to_Table_Valued_Parameters_with_Example</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:19:55 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Introduction to Filtered Index - Improve performance</title>
      <description>Filtered Index is a new feature in SQL SERVER 2008. Filtered Index is used to index a portion of rows in a table that means it applies filter on INDEX which improves query performance, reduce index maintenance costs, and reduce index storage costs compared with full-table indexes. When we see an Index created with some WHERE clause then that is actually a FILTERED INDEX.

I am sure this feature will change how the indexes are created in SQL Server. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.sqlauthority.com%2f2008%2f09%2f01%2fsql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.sqlauthority.com%2f2008%2f09%2f01%2fsql-server-2008-introduction-to-filtered-index-improve-performance-with-filtered-index%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/Introduction_to_Filtered_Index_Improve_performance</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/Introduction_to_Filtered_Index_Improve_performance</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:18:36 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQLServer2008: Workgroup VS Standard</title>
      <description>You might be in doubt when choosing between SQLServer2008 Standard or Workgroup edition - here's a list of the differences bewteen the two. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdotnetbutchering.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f09%2fsqlserver-sqlserver2008-workgroup-vs.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdotnetbutchering.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f09%2fsqlserver-sqlserver2008-workgroup-vs.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQLServer2008_Workgroup_VS_Standard</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQLServer2008_Workgroup_VS_Standard</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:04:25 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scheduling Jobs in SQL Server Express with Service Broker</title>
      <description>&amp;quot;As we all know SQL Server 2005 Express is a very powerful free edition of SQL Server 2005. However it does not contain SQL Server Agent service. Because of this scheduling jobs is not possible. So if we want to do this we have to install a free or commercial 3rd party product. This usually isn't allowed due to the security policies of many hosting companies and thus presents a problem. Maybe we want to schedule daily backups, database reindexing, statistics updating, etc. This is why I wanted to have a solution based only on SQL Server 2005 Express and not dependent on the hosting company. And of course there is one based on our old friend the Service Broker.&amp;quot;

 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sqlteam.com%2farticle%2fscheduling-jobs-in-sql-server-express"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sqlteam.com%2farticle%2fscheduling-jobs-in-sql-server-express" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/Scheduling_Jobs_in_SQL_Server_Express_with_Service_Broker</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/Scheduling_Jobs_in_SQL_Server_Express_with_Service_Broker</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:38:15 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL Server 2005 Express Job Scheduling - Part 1 </title>
      <description>SQL Server 2005 Express Job Scheduling with the help of Sql Server service broker and without 3rd party products. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.sqlteam.com%2fmladenp%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f28%2fSQL-Server-2005-Express-Job-Scheduling---Part-1.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.sqlteam.com%2fmladenp%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f28%2fSQL-Server-2005-Express-Job-Scheduling---Part-1.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_2005_Express_Job_Scheduling_Part_1</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_2005_Express_Job_Scheduling_Part_1</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:33:49 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL Server - Get Nth Highest using ROW_NUMBER() Function</title>
      <description>ROW_NUMBER function was introduced in SQL Server 2005. ROW_NUMBER as the name suggests is used to calculate row numbers in the query result set.

Prior to ROW_NUMBER developers relied on temporary tables and co-related sub-queries to accomplish the same, which often resulted in spaghetti code and overall bad query performance.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fsyedarizvi.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f08%2fsql-server-get-nth-highest-using.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fsyedarizvi.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f08%2fsql-server-get-nth-highest-using.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_Get_Nth_Highest_using_ROW_NUMBER_Function</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_Get_Nth_Highest_using_ROW_NUMBER_Function</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:10:05 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Completely Scripting a SQL Server Database</title>
      <description>A guide on how to easily script out an entire database (schema and data) using the Database Publishing Wizard. A tool that you may not know you have access to. And if you have Visual Studio 2008, you already have installed! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2008%2f08%2f25%2fCompletely-Scripting-a-SQL-Server-Database.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2008%2f08%2f25%2fCompletely-Scripting-a-SQL-Server-Database.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/Completely_Scripting_a_SQL_Server_Database</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/Completely_Scripting_a_SQL_Server_Database</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL SERVER - 2008 - Configure Database Mail - Send Email From SQL Data</title>
      <description>First and Complete article of SQL Server 2008 Database Mail configuration. From start to end - Complete article.

Bookmark it! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.sqlauthority.com%2f2008%2f08%2f23%2fsql-server-2008-configure-database-mail-send-email-from-sql-database%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.sqlauthority.com%2f2008%2f08%2f23%2fsql-server-2008-configure-database-mail-send-email-from-sql-database%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_SERVER_2008_Configure_Database_Mail_Send_Email_From_SQL_Data</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_SERVER_2008_Configure_Database_Mail_Send_Email_From_SQL_Data</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL Server 2005 temporary tables bug, feature or expected behavior? </title>
      <description>Some unexpected SQL Server behaviour around temporary  tables that is good to know about. If it can be explained... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.sqlteam.com%2fmladenp%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f21%2fSQL-Server-2005-temporary-tables-bug-feature-or-expected-behavior.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.sqlteam.com%2fmladenp%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f21%2fSQL-Server-2005-temporary-tables-bug-feature-or-expected-behavior.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_2005_temporary_tables_bug_feature_or_expected_behavior</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_2005_temporary_tables_bug_feature_or_expected_behavior</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:59:39 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL Server Data Services (SSDS) SDK (Beta)</title>
      <description>&amp;quot;This is a beta version of the Software Development Kit for SSDS including tools and client side components useful to developers building applications against SSDS.&amp;quot; (Link goes to MS Download Center) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.microsoft.com%2fdownloads%2fdetails.aspx%3fFamilyId%3d0B1FA5C6-EC9D-440B-939E-481DD05F2627%26displaylang%3den"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.microsoft.com%2fdownloads%2fdetails.aspx%3fFamilyId%3d0B1FA5C6-EC9D-440B-939E-481DD05F2627%26displaylang%3den" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_Data_Services_SSDS_SDK_Beta</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_Data_Services_SSDS_SDK_Beta</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:04:46 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL Server 2008 Management Studio tip: Status bar Custom Colors</title>
      <description>&amp;quot;Here is a handy tip for those of you who work often with multiple SQL Server instances: Custom Colors for the connection status bar.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.jemm.net%2f2008%2f08%2f12%2fsql-server-2008-management-studio-tip-status-bar-custom-colors%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.jemm.net%2f2008%2f08%2f12%2fsql-server-2008-management-studio-tip-status-bar-custom-colors%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_2008_Management_Studio_tip_Status_bar_Custom_Colors</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_2008_Management_Studio_tip_Status_bar_Custom_Colors</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL Server - Using EXCEPT Operator</title>
      <description>EXCEPT operator was introduced in SQL Server 2005. EXCEPT can be used to return distinct records from the left side of a query and which are not located on the right side. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fsyedarizvi.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f08%2fsql-server-using-except-operator.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fsyedarizvi.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f08%2fsql-server-using-except-operator.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_Using_EXCEPT_Operator</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_Using_EXCEPT_Operator</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:05:18 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL Server - Using INTERSECT Operator </title>
      <description>INTERSECT operator was introduced in SQL Server 2005. INTERSECT can be used to return distinct records from the left and right side of a query. &amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://syedarizvi.blogspot.com/2008/08/sql-server-using-intersect_07.html&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Full story&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fsyedarizvi.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f08%2fsql-server-using-intersect_07.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fsyedarizvi.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f08%2fsql-server-using-intersect_07.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_Using_INTERSECT_Operator</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_Using_INTERSECT_Operator</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:09:07 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL Server - Power of CASE function </title>
      <description>Case statement can be used to introduce conditional logic. Case statement can be used to evaluate multiple statements and return one possible output.
Case can be compared to Switch statement in modern programming languages like C#.
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fsyedarizvi.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f08%2ft-sql-power-of-case-function.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fsyedarizvi.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f08%2ft-sql-power-of-case-function.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_Power_of_CASE_function</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_Power_of_CASE_function</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:07:12 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL Server - Common Table Expressions (CTE) </title>
      <description>Common Table Expressions (CTE) construct was introduced with Microsoft SQL Server 2005. CTE behaves like a derived table but unlike derived table which has statement level scope CTE offers a procedure level.
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fsyedarizvi.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f07%2fcommon-table-expressions-cte.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fsyedarizvi.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f07%2fcommon-table-expressions-cte.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_Common_Table_Expressions_CTE</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_Common_Table_Expressions_CTE</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:05:29 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL Server 2008 RTM available from MSDN/TechNet</title>
      <description>Finally it is done and ready for download for MSDN/TechNet -subscribers. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.jemm.net%2f2008%2f08%2f06%2fsql-server-2008-rtm-available-for-download%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.jemm.net%2f2008%2f08%2f06%2fsql-server-2008-rtm-available-for-download%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_2008_RTM_available_from_MSDN_TechNet</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_2008_RTM_available_from_MSDN_TechNet</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:31:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL SERVER - 2005 - Difference Between INTERSECT and INNER JOIN </title>
      <description>INTERSECT operator in SQL Server 2005 is used to retrieve the common records from both the left and the right query of the Intersect Operator. INTERSECT operator returns almost same results as INNER JOIN clause many times.

When using INTERSECT operator the number and the order of the columns must be the same in all queries as well data type must be compatible.

Let us see understand how INTERSECT and INNER JOIN are related.We will be using AdventureWorks database to demonstrate our example. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.sqlauthority.com%2f2008%2f08%2f03%2fsql-server-2005-difference-between-intersect-and-inner-join-intersect-vs-inner-join%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.sqlauthority.com%2f2008%2f08%2f03%2fsql-server-2005-difference-between-intersect-and-inner-join-intersect-vs-inner-join%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_SERVER_2005_Difference_Between_INTERSECT_and_INNER_JOIN</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_SERVER_2005_Difference_Between_INTERSECT_and_INNER_JOIN</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:46:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services online resources</title>
      <description>Great list of online resources for SSRS. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.sqlteam.com%2fjoew%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f23%2f60656.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.sqlteam.com%2fjoew%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f23%2f60656.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/Microsoft_SQL_Server_Reporting_Services_online_resources</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/Microsoft_SQL_Server_Reporting_Services_online_resources</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:05:35 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Immediate deadlock notifications without changing existing code</title>
      <description>In my previous post about immediate deadlock notifications in SQL Server 2005 I've shown a way to use a try catch block to get the deadlock error.
The con of this method, although it uses best practice for error handling in SQL Server 2005, is that you have to change existing code and 
it doesn't work for non stored procedure code. And that IS a pretty BIG con! So here's a solution to this con.
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.sqlteam.com%2fmladenp%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f18%2fImmediate-deadlock-notifications-without-changing-existing-code.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.sqlteam.com%2fmladenp%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f18%2fImmediate-deadlock-notifications-without-changing-existing-code.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/Immediate_deadlock_notifications_without_changing_existing_code</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/Immediate_deadlock_notifications_without_changing_existing_code</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:00:36 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL Server 2005 bug when using LIKE searches</title>
      <description>Here's a demo of a nice little bug in SQL Server 2005 when using LIKE comparisons for searching. 
What is so &amp;quot;nice&amp;quot; about it is that it only manifests itself if your search ends in number 9 followed by a wildcard when 
selecting only columns covered by a nonclustered index.
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.sqlteam.com%2fmladenp%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f14%2fSQL-Server-2005-bug-when-using-LIKE-searches.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.sqlteam.com%2fmladenp%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f14%2fSQL-Server-2005-bug-when-using-LIKE-searches.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_2005_bug_when_using_LIKE_searches</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_2005_bug_when_using_LIKE_searches</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:43:30 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Setting Up an alias name for connecting to SQL server</title>
      <description>Shows you the steps you need to take to setup an alias for a sql server instance on windows server (or desktop).  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fsqlblog.net%2fpost%2f2008%2f07%2f11%2fConnecting-to-SQL-server-instance-using-an-Alias-instead-of-the-server-name-or-IP-name.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fsqlblog.net%2fpost%2f2008%2f07%2f11%2fConnecting-to-SQL-server-instance-using-an-Alias-instead-of-the-server-name-or-IP-name.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/Setting_Up_an_alias_name_for_connecting_to_SQL_server</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/Setting_Up_an_alias_name_for_connecting_to_SQL_server</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:17:09 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MySQL versus SQL Server </title>
      <description>&amp;quot;We were recently in a review where the ISV was using both SQL Server and MySQL. Of course working for Microsoft my first question was to ask why they had chosen to use MySQL.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2ffasttrackreview%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f10%2fmysql-versus-sql-server.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2ffasttrackreview%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f10%2fmysql-versus-sql-server.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/MySQL_versus_SQL_Server</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/MySQL_versus_SQL_Server</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How To: Rename SQL Server 2005 Database Using TSQL </title>
      <description>For some reasons, DBA's need to rename their Databases. One of the reasons might be to comply to Best Practices Policy changes.

Here we are going to rename our Database named "Bad_Ass_DB" into "Best_Practice_DB". This is how Database renaming with TSQL is done in SQL Server 2005....
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdbalink.wordpress.com%2f2008%2f07%2f10%2fhow-to-rename-sql-server-2005-database-using-tsql%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdbalink.wordpress.com%2f2008%2f07%2f10%2fhow-to-rename-sql-server-2005-database-using-tsql%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/How_To_Rename_SQL_Server_2005_Database_Using_TSQL</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/How_To_Rename_SQL_Server_2005_Database_Using_TSQL</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 08:19:56 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL Server 2005 Security Update (KB948109) fails to install with error</title>
      <description>Gotcha to watch out for with the SQL security update. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.jemm.net%2f2008%2f07%2f09%2fsql-server-2005-security-update-kb948109-fails-to-install-with-error-code-0x773f-how-to-fix%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.jemm.net%2f2008%2f07%2f09%2fsql-server-2005-security-update-kb948109-fails-to-install-with-error-code-0x773f-how-to-fix%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_2005_Security_Update_KB948109_fails_to_install_with_error</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_2005_Security_Update_KB948109_fails_to_install_with_error</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:55:21 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to create SQL Server temp tables without collation problems  </title>
      <description>Using temp tables in Microsoft SQL Server is tricky when your databases don't follow the server collation. This post explains how to create temp tables while avoiding the use of explicit COLLATE statements in your TSQL code. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2ffoxtricks.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f07%2fhow-to-properly-create-temp-tables-in.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2ffoxtricks.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f07%2fhow-to-properly-create-temp-tables-in.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/How_to_create_SQL_Server_temp_tables_without_collation_problems</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/How_to_create_SQL_Server_temp_tables_without_collation_problems</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:06:27 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>