<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com - Stories tagged with Testing</title>
    <description>the latest stories tagged with 'Testing' from DotNetKicks.com</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Use Virtual PC 2007 Effectively Without Joining The Corporate Domain</title>
      <description>How to test your corproate .NET applicaitons in a Virtual PC setting without joining the domain. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.huffs.us%2fblogEngine%2fpost%2f2008%2f10%2fUse-Virtual-PC-2007-Effectively-Without-Joining-The-Corporate-Domain.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.huffs.us%2fblogEngine%2fpost%2f2008%2f10%2fUse-Virtual-PC-2007-Effectively-Without-Joining-The-Corporate-Domain.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Use_Virtual_PC_2007_Effectively_Without_Joining_The_Corporate_Domain</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Use_Virtual_PC_2007_Effectively_Without_Joining_The_Corporate_Domain</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:28:16 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rhino Mocks 3.5 RTM</title>
      <description>3.5 RTM released. New features and bug fixes listed. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fayende.com%2fBlog%2farchive%2f2008%2f10%2f05%2frhino-mocks-3.5-rtm.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fayende.com%2fBlog%2farchive%2f2008%2f10%2f05%2frhino-mocks-3.5-rtm.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Rhino_Mocks_3_5_RTM</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Rhino_Mocks_3_5_RTM</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Three Simple Rhino Mocks Rules</title>
      <description>Jimmy Bogard shows how he uses the new Rhino Mocks syntax, and three short rules for using it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fjimmy_bogard%2farchive%2f2008%2f10%2f05%2fthree-simple-rhino-mocks-rules.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fjimmy_bogard%2farchive%2f2008%2f10%2f05%2fthree-simple-rhino-mocks-rules.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Three_Simple_Rhino_Mocks_Rules</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Three_Simple_Rhino_Mocks_Rules</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:46:13 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UI Automation not fit for command!</title>
      <description>I really wanted to like the .NET UI Automation framework for unit testing my GUI (with a mock back-end).  Unfortunately, I believe it is a major FAIL! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fbrian.genisio.org%2f2008%2f10%2fui-automation-not-fit-for-command.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fbrian.genisio.org%2f2008%2f10%2fui-automation-not-fit-for-command.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/UI_Automation_not_fit_for_command</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/UI_Automation_not_fit_for_command</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 01:50:07 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mocking and Mystery</title>
      <description>I'm starting to think that mock objects are a sign of an anti-pattern... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.valleyhighlands.com%2fttc%2fpost%2fMocking-and-Mystery.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.valleyhighlands.com%2fttc%2fpost%2fMocking-and-Mystery.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Mocking_and_Mystery</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Mocking_and_Mystery</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 05:44:09 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4 Common Follies Made In Unit/Integration Testing</title>
      <description>Review 4 common unit testing and integration testing follies. From testing with databases to not testing components because &amp;quot;You think they work&amp;quot;.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.donnfelker.com%2fpost%2f4-Common-Follies-Made-In-UnitIntegration-Testing.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.donnfelker.com%2fpost%2f4-Common-Follies-Made-In-UnitIntegration-Testing.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/patterns/4_Common_Follies_Made_In_Unit_Integration_Testing</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/patterns/4_Common_Follies_Made_In_Unit_Integration_Testing</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:29:20 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unit Tests to the rescue</title>
      <description>Today started off in a bad, bad way.  Because of some issues I had earlier in the week with my source control repository (SCR) I was doing a ton of work offline.  Today I was able to regain access to my SCR I decided to do a full get.  I was fully expecting SourceOffSite (crappy overlay tool on top of VSS -- BTW, VSS is the devil) to prompt me for conflicts or do merges...... NOPE &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicio.us%2fblogs%2fderik_whittaker%2farchive%2f2008%2f10%2f02%2funit-tests-to-the-rescue.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicio.us%2fblogs%2fderik_whittaker%2farchive%2f2008%2f10%2f02%2funit-tests-to-the-rescue.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Unit_Tests_to_the_rescue</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Unit_Tests_to_the_rescue</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:30:15 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unit Testing for Developers and Managers</title>
      <description>Excellent Post on Unit testing and real life  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.udidahan.com%2f2008%2f09%2f30%2funit-testing-for-developers-and-managers%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.udidahan.com%2f2008%2f09%2f30%2funit-testing-for-developers-and-managers%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Unit_Testing_for_Developers_and_Managers</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Unit_Testing_for_Developers_and_Managers</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 07:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Testing - It's About Ensuring Correctness</title>
      <description>Tim admonishes us to test our code by showing an example of a simple bug that could easy cost far more to debug and fix once in production. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicio.us%2fblogs%2ftim_barcz%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f30%2ftesting-it-s-about-ensuring-correctness.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicio.us%2fblogs%2ftim_barcz%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f30%2ftesting-it-s-about-ensuring-correctness.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Testing_It_s_About_Ensuring_Correctness</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Testing_It_s_About_Ensuring_Correctness</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 02:42:57 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unit testing and PInvoking pt.3</title>
      <description>Third post in a series on how to set up PInvoke calls so they're easy, reusable and testable. With examples or tests with the Rhino Mocks AAA syntax. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.mendeltsiebenga.com%2fpost%2fUnit-testing-and-PInvoking-pt3.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.mendeltsiebenga.com%2fpost%2fUnit-testing-and-PInvoking-pt3.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Unit_testing_and_PInvoking_pt_3</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Unit_testing_and_PInvoking_pt_3</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:25:50 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Testing ASP.NET MVC using Typemock AAA Syntax</title>
      <description>AAA syntax stands for Arrange, Act and Assert . It is a way to make a test readable, maintainable and convenient. In this post I am going to show you how can we test ASP.NET MVC code by using Typemock's AAA syntax. AAA ensures the separation of concern for unit test code. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fitscommonsensestupid.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f09%2ftesting-aspnet-mvc-using-typemock-aaa.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fitscommonsensestupid.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f09%2ftesting-aspnet-mvc-using-typemock-aaa.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Testing_ASP_NET_MVC_using_Typemock_AAA_Syntax</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Testing_ASP_NET_MVC_using_Typemock_AAA_Syntax</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:03:38 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How many test should I write?</title>
      <description>How can you introduce gracefully unit testing in your team? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.nablasoft.com%2falkampfer%2findex.php%2f2008%2f09%2f25%2fhow-many-test-should-i-write%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.nablasoft.com%2falkampfer%2findex.php%2f2008%2f09%2f25%2fhow-many-test-should-i-write%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/How_many_test_should_I_write</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/How_many_test_should_I_write</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:52:07 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Behavior driven development, BDD, hype or a paradigm shift?</title>
      <description>The notion of BDD is floating around more frequently in the community lately. But what is BDD and is it just a hype? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lowendahl.net%2fshowShout.aspx%3fid%3d223"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lowendahl.net%2fshowShout.aspx%3fid%3d223" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Behavior_driven_development_BDD_hype_or_a_paradigm_shift</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Behavior_driven_development_BDD_hype_or_a_paradigm_shift</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:03:21 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Not doing TDD is worst than doing it wrong in the beggining.</title>
      <description>Check this out, and make a learn from it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fian_cooper%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f23%2flearning-and-crafstmanship.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fian_cooper%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f23%2flearning-and-crafstmanship.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Not_doing_TDD_is_worst_than_doing_it_wrong_in_the_beggining</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Not_doing_TDD_is_worst_than_doing_it_wrong_in_the_beggining</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Flattening The Learning Curve - Your Input Needed</title>
      <description>Tim Barcz inquires how we can assist in helping others learn TDD.  People abandon TDD because of the steep learning curve, Tim seeks to flatten the learning curve. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicio.us%2fblogs%2ftim_barcz%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f22%2fflattening-the-learning-curve-your-input-needed.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicio.us%2fblogs%2ftim_barcz%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f22%2fflattening-the-learning-curve-your-input-needed.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Flattening_The_Learning_Curve_Your_Input_Needed</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Flattening_The_Learning_Curve_Your_Input_Needed</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:05:36 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ten tips to maximize the return on your TDD investment </title>
      <description>Its definitely worth the time &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fjimmy_bogard%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f21%2ften-tips-to-maximize-the-return-on-your-tdd-investment.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fjimmy_bogard%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f21%2ften-tips-to-maximize-the-return-on-your-tdd-investment.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Ten_tips_to_maximize_the_return_on_your_TDD_investment</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Ten_tips_to_maximize_the_return_on_your_TDD_investment</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:28:54 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&amp;quot;Mock&amp;quot; Backend for Castle ActiveRecord</title>
      <description>Testing code that uses Castle ActiveRecord business objects requires some sort of back end for persistence.  This approach allows you to use a &amp;quot;mock&amp;quot; back end with ActiveRecord so that you don't need to rely on a file system or database service to unit test your services. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fbrian.genisio.org%2f2008%2f07%2factive-record-mock-framework.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fbrian.genisio.org%2f2008%2f07%2factive-record-mock-framework.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Mock_Backend_for_Castle_ActiveRecord</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Mock_Backend_for_Castle_ActiveRecord</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:34:36 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Setting up Continuous Integration for your Application with Team City</title>
      <description>A short screencast on setting up Continuous Integration for your Application with Team City &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dimecasts.net%2fCasts%2fCastDetails%2f46"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dimecasts.net%2fCasts%2fCastDetails%2f46" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Setting_up_Continuous_Integration_for_your_Application_with_Team_City</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Setting_up_Continuous_Integration_for_your_Application_with_Team_City</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Every Good Developer needs to Know how to Mock</title>
      <description>While unit testing is generally considered a good practice ( even among those who don't do unit tests), mocking doesn't seem to carry the same aura. There are a lot of arguments saying why mocking is bad , how it kills testability etc. 

But in my day-to-day job, as well as in my personal projects, I found mocking is definitely indispensable.
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fitscommonsensestupid.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f09%2fwhy-every-good-developer-needs-to-know.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fitscommonsensestupid.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f09%2fwhy-every-good-developer-needs-to-know.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Why_Every_Good_Developer_needs_to_Know_how_to_Mock</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Why_Every_Good_Developer_needs_to_Know_how_to_Mock</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TDD Tips: Unit Test Namespace considerations</title>
      <description>There's a debate and poll going on about where you should put your tests.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fstupiddumbguy.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f05%2ftdd-tips-unit-test-namespace.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fstupiddumbguy.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f05%2ftdd-tips-unit-test-namespace.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/TDD_Tips_Unit_Test_Namespace_considerations</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/TDD_Tips_Unit_Test_Namespace_considerations</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:37:35 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quality and Code Coverage</title>
      <description>It's an age-old question: should our team's goal be 100% coverage?  A valid question, but one I've never much cared about in practice.  The idea is that the team, all practicing TDD, should dutifully measure and add unit tests until they reach the assumed pinnacle of unit testing: 100% coverage. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fjimmy_bogard%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f09%2fquality-and-code-coverage.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fjimmy_bogard%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f09%2fquality-and-code-coverage.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Quality_and_Code_Coverage</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Quality_and_Code_Coverage</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:10:17 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gallio - Automation Platform for .NET</title>
      <description>At present Gallio can run tests from MbUnit versions 2 and 3, MSTest, NBehave, NUnit, and xUnit.Net.  Gallio provides tool support and integration with CCNet, MSBuild, NAnt, NCover, Pex, Powershell, Resharper, TestDriven.Net, TypeMock, and Visual Studio Team System.

 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.gallio.org%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.gallio.org%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Gallio_Automation_Platform_for_NET</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Gallio_Automation_Platform_for_NET</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:31:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Testing Windows Form using TypeMock</title>
      <description>How to test GUI by using an unit testing tool and applying good design principles. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fitscommonsensestupid.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f09%2ftesting-windows-form-using-typemock.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fitscommonsensestupid.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f09%2ftesting-windows-form-using-typemock.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Testing_Windows_Form_using_TypeMock</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Testing_Windows_Form_using_TypeMock</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:26:10 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FsTest Updated with F# CTP</title>
      <description>Back in June, I announced the creation of FsTest, a testing Domain Specific Language for F#.  Since that time, the F# team has released the September 2008 CTP, which finally gives F# full citizenship within Visual Studio with real project files.  I felt it was time to update FsTest, and more in particular, FsxUnit, which uses xUnit.net as the back end for doing assertions.  Go ahead and pick up the latest bits here from the CodePlex site. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fmatthew.podwysocki%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f04%2ffstest-updated-with-f-ctp.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fmatthew.podwysocki%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f04%2ffstest-updated-with-f-ctp.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/FsTest_Updated_with_F_CTP</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/FsTest_Updated_with_F_CTP</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 03:57:07 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Design for testability</title>
      <description>Some notes on design for testability and mocking &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2ffreekleemhuis.wordpress.com%2f2008%2f09%2f03%2funit-testing-part-3-design-for-testability%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2ffreekleemhuis.wordpress.com%2f2008%2f09%2f03%2funit-testing-part-3-design-for-testability%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Design_for_testability</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Design_for_testability</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:24:14 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>