DotNetKick.com is an open-source project. Please report any bugs and let us know your great suggestions. Currently running svn revision 620 (rss)

Kick Spy!, Kick Zeitgeist and Kick Widgets

22
kicks
Unit tests are for functionality, not code!
published 2 months, 17 days ago, submitted by Obishawn Obishawn 2 months, 18 days ago

ytechie.com — Unit tests are meant to test functionality, NOT code! That means if you write your unit tests after the fact, you’re probably not focusing on the functionality.

Add a comment 1 comment | category: | Views: 311 | Get KickIt image code
tags: | tag it

new Add a live kick counter to your blog >> liveImage

You can even customize the image by choosing your own colors, and then clicking the button below to update the preview and the html code:

  • "Kick It" text
  • "Kick It" background
  • kick count text
  • kick count background
  • border

Simply copy and paste this HTML into your blog post.


Users who kicked this story:
Obishawn Obishawn - SuperJason SuperJason - JohnRLewis - melzie215 - jonas jonas - spoulson - adminjew adminjew - Jemm Jemm - Reman - ercu - JudahGabriel JudahGabriel - johnrummell johnrummell - mdopp mdopp - adron - liu1642 liu1642 - nsoonhui - m_bearach - sidarok - fintz69 - jims - belaycrag - vb6stillrocksman

Comments:
I love that someone took the time to rant about the right way to do unit testing and created a detailed 7 step process which fails to encapsulate "red, green, refactor". Luckily, the first comment by anonymous cleared it up--and shaved some steps in the process ;)
posted by jesse 2 months, 17 days ago



information Login or create an account to comment on this story
 

Sponsored Link: www.carlist.ie

Search:

Ads via The Lounge

You are the editor:
View upcoming stories
Submit a story
How else can I help?
Earn money
Tags: all tags - your tags