This is a direct link instead of the digg.com: http://tracexplorer.devjavu.com/?redirectedfrom=WikiStart

We should be using NH Forge instead I guess.. (see kicked story http://nhforge.org/blogs/nhibernate/archive/2008/08/29/welcome-to-the-nhibernate-blog.aspx)

Hmm.. they missed "Data Source=:memory:;" for SQLite... :(

the actual linkt to ankSVN is http://ankhsvn.open.collab.net/servlets/ProjectProcess?pageID=3794

Well a bit long and audio is more or less async. Nevertheless:
kicks++;

Nice look beyond one's own nose ;)

Well, I kicked it because it is a Product which has addons which are written in C#. So this is a CMS expandable via C#. Intetresting, so I kicked it.

I accidently clicked "Events" as category. It should have been C#. Is there any way I can change that? If not, will there be a way in a future DotNetKicks version? ;)

This has nothing to do with .net at all. -1Kick from me. And I really wished I could give negative kicks, because this blog post is simply wrong. CodeClimber has no idea of what opera (both the company, the browser and the open letter) is all about.

Nice way - I have to try that out.

Well that article says it is from late 2006. The author learned quit a few things, so this article is not so uptodate anymore (he is not using seperation of concerns, combining the model with the view.) So I think this article is not a good start for MVP-newbies.

Somebody in the comments of that article mentioned Heckle for Ruby ( http://ruby.sadi.st/Heckle.html ). Is there something similar for .NET?

I don't get it. Why should one want the lower layers of the application to create the instances? IMO this makes testing with mocking frameworks more difficult, because you can't inject a already initialised mockObject. Instead you tell the class under test to create a new instance of a mocked class you which have to be coded first. Does this approach take away the chance of using a mocking framework like NMock or Rhino.Mocks?

Really usefull. I'll try to improve my "code-nose" with this.

say that again frogsbrain! I, as a .net guy, found that article very interesting and even funny. I wonder where else XP and Agile method are enforced that strict... The fact that those Java-guys have these tools way befor they are ported shows me once again that maybe I should look over the .net rim more often. And imo so do you cdjaco.

Nice article, I wasn't aware of this but like those fluent interfaces and the way the code looks like when they are used.