<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com : Stories kicked by CraigStuntz</title>
    <description>Stories kicked by CraigStuntz</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Suspicious DNK Accounts</title>
      <description>Conclusion
There is an incentive for publishers that use DNK to setup phony accounts that will help get stories from certain domains on the front page.  So guess what happens ... it would appear that a certain number of people are doing this. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmattberseth.com%2fblog%2f2008%2f11%2fincentives_cheating_teachers_a.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fmattberseth.com%2fblog%2f2008%2f11%2fincentives_cheating_teachers_a.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Suspicious_DNK_Accounts</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Suspicious_DNK_Accounts</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:31:29 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is WCF the Death of .NET?</title>
      <description>I had the good fortune to attend the PDC pre-conference and was able to attend a day-long WCF session with Juval Lowy and Ron Jacobs.

Juval went first and spoke for most of the day. Juval has been working closely with Microsoft for quite some time, and his COM(+) roots were showing big time. Essentially, Juval is of the opinion that WCF is a .NET killer and should be the way ALL applications are written from here on it.

As Juval has extensive expertise with COM, I think he tends to see everything in terms of that model, and he may have a point. As a result, he made the bold statement in the pre-conf session of referring to WCF as a .NET killer. 

While I'm not prepared to follow Juval in claiming .NET dead at the hands of WCF, he makes some good points. If you think of the communication between objects in a system analogous to the communication of services in an architecture, WCF provides some cool abilities that the traditional model in .NET does not. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fjamescbender.com%2fbendersblog%2farchive%2f2008%2f11%2f04%2fis-wcf-the-death-of-.net.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fjamescbender.com%2fbendersblog%2farchive%2f2008%2f11%2f04%2fis-wcf-the-death-of-.net.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Is_WCF_the_Death_of_NET</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Is_WCF_the_Death_of_NET</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:12:17 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mocking ASP.NET MVC HtmlHelper using Moq</title>
      <description>HtmlHelper is used quite frequently in ASP.MVC. It has a number of dependencies, so testing the numerous extension methods on it (both default, and added) can make for some ugly code. This simple code sample shows how to mock out the dependencies (ViewContext for one) using Moq. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.benhartonline.com%2fpost%2f2008%2f10%2f17%2fMocking-ASPNET-MVC-HtmlHelper-extension-methods-using-Moq.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.benhartonline.com%2fpost%2f2008%2f10%2f17%2fMocking-ASPNET-MVC-HtmlHelper-extension-methods-using-Moq.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Mocking_ASP_NET_MVC_HtmlHelper_using_Moq</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Mocking_ASP_NET_MVC_HtmlHelper_using_Moq</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:26:19 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>jQuery ajax with asp.net mvc preview 5</title>
      <description>How to use the AjaxHelpers in preview 5 with jQuery as the ajax engine &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.chrisvandesteeg.nl%2f2008%2f09%2f16%2fjquery-ajax-with-aspnet-mvc-preview-5%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.chrisvandesteeg.nl%2f2008%2f09%2f16%2fjquery-ajax-with-aspnet-mvc-preview-5%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/jQuery_ajax_with_asp_net_mvc_preview_5</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/jQuery_ajax_with_asp_net_mvc_preview_5</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:31:10 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tips &amp;amp; Tricks: Use DebuggerDisplayAttribute for easier debugging</title>
      <description>When debugging, it's common to hover over an object to get a quick view of what its properties are. This is where DebuggerDisplayAttribute comes in. The format string looks similar to normal .NET format strings in that the values to replace are between curly braces, but instead of being told what to substitute the debugger treats these values as expressions and attempts to evaluate them using the current context.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fgregbeech.com%2fblogs%2ftech%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f28%2ftips-amp-tricks-use-debuggerdisplayattribute-for-easier-debugging.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fgregbeech.com%2fblogs%2ftech%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f28%2ftips-amp-tricks-use-debuggerdisplayattribute-for-easier-debugging.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Tips_Tricks_Use_DebuggerDisplayAttribute_for_easier_debugging</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Tips_Tricks_Use_DebuggerDisplayAttribute_for_easier_debugging</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sending Email in a Development Environment without an SMTP Server</title>
      <description>Very handy... I'm forever looking this stuff up :-|  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.donnfelker.com%2fpost%2fSending-Email-in-a-Development-Environment-without-an-SMTP-Server.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.donnfelker.com%2fpost%2fSending-Email-in-a-Development-Environment-without-an-SMTP-Server.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Sending_Email_in_a_Development_Environment_without_an_SMTP_Server</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Sending_Email_in_a_Development_Environment_without_an_SMTP_Server</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Expose New Linq Operations from the HashSet&amp;lt;T&amp;gt; Performance Monster</title>
      <description>Linq is not just about databases. It's about reading the registry, your hard-disk, or even a list of function pointers to be invoked. Linq is about more event then sets (collections). It's about making tasks easier in many cases and vastly more powerful (and most importantly your code more readable and maintainable at the same time).     It's astounding just how fast the HashSet&amp;lt;T&amp;gt; collection is. This post will show how to gain additional power that is fully supported from Microsoft which is often overlooked, yet it can solve some of the hardest problems (especially around performance however don't prematurely optimize!).

Linq, HashSet, ORM, NHibernate, Linq to NHibernate, Linq Undocumented, Functional Programming, .NET 3.5 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.domaindotnet.com%2f2008%2f09%2f08%2fthe_fastest_dot_net_hash_set_collection_with_linq_extended_features%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.domaindotnet.com%2f2008%2f09%2f08%2fthe_fastest_dot_net_hash_set_collection_with_linq_extended_features%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Expose_New_Linq_Operations_from_the_HashSet_T_Performance_Monster</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Expose_New_Linq_Operations_from_the_HashSet_T_Performance_Monster</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Using the ASP.NET MVC ModelBinder attribute</title>
      <description>ASP.NET MVC action methods can be developed using regular method parameters. In earlier versions of the ASP.NET MVC framework, these parameters were all simple types like integers, strings, booleans, . When required, a method parameter can be a complex type like a Contact with Name, Email and Message properties.

This blog post shows you how to use the ModelBinder attribute which allows ASP.NET MVC action methods to accept complex types. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.maartenballiauw.be%2fpost%2f2008%2f08%2f29%2fUsing-the-ASPNET-MVC-ModelBinder-attribute.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.maartenballiauw.be%2fpost%2f2008%2f08%2f29%2fUsing-the-ASPNET-MVC-ModelBinder-attribute.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Using_the_ASP_NET_MVC_ModelBinder_attribute</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Using_the_ASP_NET_MVC_ModelBinder_attribute</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Form validation with ASP.NET MVC preview 5</title>
      <description>In earlier ASP.NET MVC previews, form validation was something that should be implemented &amp;quot;by hand&amp;quot;. Since the new ASP.NET MVC preview 5, form validation has become more handy. Let me show you how you can add validation in such a ridiculously easy manner.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.maartenballiauw.be%2fpost%2f2008%2f08%2f29%2fForm-validation-with-ASPNET-MVC-preview-5.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.maartenballiauw.be%2fpost%2f2008%2f08%2f29%2fForm-validation-with-ASPNET-MVC-preview-5.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Form_validation_with_ASP_NET_MVC_preview_5</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Form_validation_with_ASP_NET_MVC_preview_5</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC P5 released on Codeplex</title>
      <description>Keeping on with the 6 weeks release plan, the ASP.NET MVC team quietly release P5 of ASP.NET MVC on Codeplex. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodeclimber.net.nz%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f29%2fasp.net-mvc-preview5-released.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodeclimber.net.nz%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f29%2fasp.net-mvc-preview5-released.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_MVC_P5_released_on_Codeplex</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_MVC_P5_released_on_Codeplex</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:16:12 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dear Asp.Net Developers: Stop Making Our Technology Look Bad</title>
      <description>Have you ever tried to use one browser and one browser only? This article outlines how impossible it can be even in 2008 to do.  There are countless public facing Asp.Net web sites that require Internet Explorer.  The perception and impact this has on the non Asp.Net community is something developers need to think about.  It is an interesting read that provides a lot of insight into the problem and some ways to fix it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fkeithelder.net%2fblog%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f28%2fDear-Asp.Net-Developers-Stop-Making-Our-Technology-Look-Bad.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fkeithelder.net%2fblog%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f28%2fDear-Asp.Net-Developers-Stop-Making-Our-Technology-Look-Bad.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Dear_Asp_Net_Developers_Stop_Making_Our_Technology_Look_Bad</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Dear_Asp_Net_Developers_Stop_Making_Our_Technology_Look_Bad</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:01:11 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bad advice on exceptions from Joel</title>
      <description>Starting from some comments on my exception handling series of articles I run into a couple of blogs pointing to this post on joelonsoftware.com. I think this is the worst advice on exception handling I have ever read, sorry Joel. I know this is an old post, I know Joel is entitled to his own opinion and I know he has the right to write his code as he sees fit. But as an opinion leader he influences others. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2flittletutorials.com%2f2008%2f08%2f23%2fbad-advice-on-exceptions-from-joel%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2flittletutorials.com%2f2008%2f08%2f23%2fbad-advice-on-exceptions-from-joel%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Bad_advice_on_exceptions_from_Joel</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Bad_advice_on_exceptions_from_Joel</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Starting with jQuery - Effects</title>
      <description>This is second post in a string of posts where I chronicle my adventure in learning jQuery from having no previous experience with the framework.  This week, we look at basic animation effects that affect an element's visibility that are available &amp;quot;out of the box&amp;quot; with jQuery. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2frandomactsofcoding.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f08%2fstarting-with-jquery-effects.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2frandomactsofcoding.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f08%2fstarting-with-jquery-effects.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Starting_with_jQuery_Effects</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Starting_with_jQuery_Effects</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 09:31:09 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>7 principles of clean and optimized CSS code</title>
      <description>With the popularity of CSS layouts and JavaScript-enriched web page experiences, it's not uncommon, particularly for large sites, for the CSS files alone to grow in size,  but there are some principles to consider during and after you write your CSS to help keep it tight and optimized. Optimization isn't just minimizing file size - it's also about being organized, clutter-free, and efficient. You'll find that the more knowledge you have about optimal CSS practices, smaller file size will inevitably come as an direct result of their implementation. You may already be familiar with some of the principles mentioned in this article, but they are worth a review. Being familiar with this concepts will help you write optimized CSS code and make you a better all-around web designer. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.smashingmagazine.com%2f2008%2f08%2f18%2f7-principles-of-clean-and-optimized-css-code%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.smashingmagazine.com%2f2008%2f08%2f18%2f7-principles-of-clean-and-optimized-css-code%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/tipsandtricks/7_principles_of_clean_and_optimized_CSS_code</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/tipsandtricks/7_principles_of_clean_and_optimized_CSS_code</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Implementing a Repository and Specificaiton pattern using Linq</title>
      <description>In my previous post I put down some thoughts on the Repository and Specification patterns and in the end said that with the introduction of Linq and the growing popularity of ORM frameworks and their support for Linq, it's time to look back at these two patterns and see how we can leverage Linq to simplify the patterns and make them infrastructure agnostic. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codeinsanity.com%2f2008%2f08%2fimplementing-repository-and.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codeinsanity.com%2f2008%2f08%2fimplementing-repository-and.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/patterns/Implementing_a_Repository_and_Specificaiton_pattern_using_Linq</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/patterns/Implementing_a_Repository_and_Specificaiton_pattern_using_Linq</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:31:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Enabling Javascript Intellisense In External Libraries</title>
      <description>To get JavaScript IntelliSense working in VS 2008 SP1, you need to tell IntelliSense the location of the libraries that you're using. You do that by adding a special comment at the top of the .js file.  Here's How.. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fkencox%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f14%2fenabling-javascript-intellisense-in-external-libraries.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fkencox%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f14%2fenabling-javascript-intellisense-in-external-libraries.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Enabling_Javascript_Intellisense_In_External_Libraries</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Enabling_Javascript_Intellisense_In_External_Libraries</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:01:10 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Filters in ASP.NET MVC Preview 4</title>
      <description>In CodePlex Preview 4 of ASP.NET MVC, we split out our action filters into four types of filters, each of which is an interface. To write a custom filter, you simply need to create an attribute that also implements one of the four interfaces I mentioned. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f14%2faspnetmvc-filters.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f14%2faspnetmvc-filters.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Filters_in_ASP_NET_MVC_Preview_4</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Filters_in_ASP_NET_MVC_Preview_4</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to easily enhance your existing tables with simple CSS</title>
      <description>A detailed example of how to use CSS to style an HTML table. The example is specifically focused on styling a table generated on the client-side via AJAX, but is applicable to any HTML table. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fencosia.com%2f2008%2f08%2f13%2fhow-to-easily-enhance-your-existing-tables-with-simple-css%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fencosia.com%2f2008%2f08%2f13%2fhow-to-easily-enhance-your-existing-tables-with-simple-css%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ajax/How_to_easily_enhance_your_existing_tables_with_simple_CSS</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ajax/How_to_easily_enhance_your_existing_tables_with_simple_CSS</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What's new for Entity Framework in the VS 2008 SP1?</title>
      <description>Between the Visual Studio 200 SP1 beta and RTM , there are a number of fixes and even a few new things to be found. What's in ADO.NET? Check out this list for what's new in the Entity Framework and Entity Designer. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2fadonet%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f11%2fwhat-s-new-in-the-vs-2008-sp1.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2fadonet%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f11%2fwhat-s-new-in-the-vs-2008-sp1.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/What_s_new_for_Entity_Framework_in_the_VS_2008_SP1</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/What_s_new_for_Entity_Framework_in_the_VS_2008_SP1</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:58:49 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET Browsers Filter!!</title>
      <description>Yesterday .NET SP1 released and many new features for ASP.NET where added. But yesterday i also discovered a feature that ASP.NET has from version 2.0
Let's say we have a button. We can decide what value will the properties have for different browsers!!! And we can do that with this way... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fjohnkatsiotis%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f12%2fasp-net-browsers-filter.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fjohnkatsiotis%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f12%2fasp-net-browsers-filter.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_Browsers_Filter</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_Browsers_Filter</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:16:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL Server 2008 Installation Confusion, VS 2008 Sp1 and NetFx 3.5 Sp1</title>
      <description>Clear as Mud? I try... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2feuanga%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f07%2fsql-server-2008-installation-confusion-vs-2008-sp1-and-netfx-3-5-sp1.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2feuanga%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f07%2fsql-server-2008-installation-confusion-vs-2008-sp1-and-netfx-3-5-sp1.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_2008_Installation_Confusion_VS_2008_Sp1_and_NetFx_3_5_Sp1</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_2008_Installation_Confusion_VS_2008_Sp1_and_NetFx_3_5_Sp1</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:36:34 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>JSON Serializers in .NET - not there yet</title>
      <description>.NET Framework 3.5 provides a couple of choices for JSON Serialization and Deserialization. Find out how you can use them and also some of the problems that both of these tools impose. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.west-wind.com%2fweblog%2fposts%2f442969.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.west-wind.com%2fweblog%2fposts%2f442969.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/JSON_Serializers_in_NET_not_there_yet</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/JSON_Serializers_in_NET_not_there_yet</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Utilizing Ninject with ASP.NET MVC Framework</title>
      <description>A in depth article about how to use Ninject with ASP.NET MVC...  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fpolymorphicview.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f08%2futilizing-ninject-with-aspnet-mvc.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fpolymorphicview.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f08%2futilizing-ninject-with-aspnet-mvc.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Utilizing_Ninject_with_ASP_NET_MVC_Framework</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Utilizing_Ninject_with_ASP_NET_MVC_Framework</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:55:36 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Combining jQuery Validation with ASP.NET MVC</title>
      <description>See how the jQuery Validation plugin can be used with the MVC framework to validate all the inputs in a form before it is submitted to the controller. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fcibrax%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f01%2fcombining-jquery-validation-with-asp-net-mvc.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fcibrax%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f01%2fcombining-jquery-validation-with-asp-net-mvc.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ajax/Combining_jQuery_Validation_with_ASP_NET_MVC</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ajax/Combining_jQuery_Validation_with_ASP_NET_MVC</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 06:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AJAX Panels with ASP.NET MVC</title>
      <description>ASP.NET MVC Preview 4 brought a bit of AJAX support, which is a natural fit for the MVC design pattern. This article will show how incredibly easy it is to create &amp;quot;lazy loading AJAX panels&amp;quot; with ASP.NET MVC. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.singingeels.com%2fArticles%2fAJAX_Panels_with_ASPNET_MVC.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.singingeels.com%2fArticles%2fAJAX_Panels_with_ASPNET_MVC.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ajax/AJAX_Panels_with_ASP_NET_MVC</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ajax/AJAX_Panels_with_ASP_NET_MVC</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:27:47 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>