<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com : Stories kicked by Jacob</title>
    <description>Stories kicked by Jacob</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Quality and Code Coverage</title>
      <description>It's an age-old question: should our team's goal be 100% coverage?  A valid question, but one I've never much cared about in practice.  The idea is that the team, all practicing TDD, should dutifully measure and add unit tests until they reach the assumed pinnacle of unit testing: 100% coverage. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fjimmy_bogard%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f09%2fquality-and-code-coverage.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fjimmy_bogard%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f09%2fquality-and-code-coverage.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Quality_and_Code_Coverage</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Quality_and_Code_Coverage</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:10:17 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Subtext 2 supports OpenID</title>
      <description>Jon explains how OpenID works in Subtext 2 and how to configure it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fjgalloway%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f20%2fsubtext-2-openid-login-support.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fjgalloway%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f20%2fsubtext-2-openid-login-support.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Subtext_2_supports_OpenID</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Subtext_2_supports_OpenID</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Testability in .Net</title>
      <description>Your environment can have a profound effect on how you develop software. The details of what I discuss here have zero practical meaning outside of the .Net world (though you can probably find parallels in other environments). That's because .Net developers have access to tools that invalidate rules of software design that are fundamentally important elsewhere (before you question whether an environment can effect what is good design, consider the difference between good design in C and, say, Prolog). For .Net, the free availability of a tool like Typemock makes a major design consideration simply disappear-namely, testability. Typemock literally robs the term "testability" of meaning in .Net design considerations. That's a freedom that should leave other developers gasping in envy. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftheruntime.com%2fblogs%2fjacob%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f15%2ftestability-in-.net.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2ftheruntime.com%2fblogs%2fjacob%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f15%2ftestability-in-.net.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Testability_in_Net</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Testability_in_Net</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:38:46 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TDD or POUT</title>
      <description> Because Unit Testing is the plain-Jane progenitor of Test Driven Development, it's kind of unfair that it doesn't have an acronym of its own. After all, it's hard to get programmer types to pay attention if they don't have some obscure jargon to bandy about. UT is too awkward, besides being a state abbreviation in the U.S., so for this post (and, if it catches on, future posts as well) I'll borrow from the telco folks and call unit testing Plain Old Unit Testing. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.theruntime.com%2fblogs%2fjacob%2farchive%2f2008%2f01%2f31%2ftdd-or-pout.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.theruntime.com%2fblogs%2fjacob%2farchive%2f2008%2f01%2f31%2ftdd-or-pout.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/TDD_or_POUT</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/TDD_or_POUT</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Test Supported Development (TSD) is not Test Driven Development (TDD) </title>
      <description>&amp;quot;Test Supported Development&amp;quot; (TSD) intends to characterize the creation of tests during ANY/ALL stages of development, that is, tests are not necessarily created before their respective System Under Test (SUT), but not necessarily created as an afterthought, either... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.troyd.net%2fTest%2bSupported%2bDevelopment%2bTSD%2bIs%2bNot%2bTest%2bDriven%2bDevelopment%2bTDD.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.troyd.net%2fTest%2bSupported%2bDevelopment%2bTSD%2bIs%2bNot%2bTest%2bDriven%2bDevelopment%2bTDD.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Test_Supported_Development_TSD_is_not_Test_Driven_Development_TDD</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Test_Supported_Development_TSD_is_not_Test_Driven_Development_TDD</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:38:20 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TDD Proven Effective! Or is it?</title>
      <description>So when Phil Haack announced that Research Supports the Effectiveness of TDD I was more than a little interested in seeing what the linked report actually contained. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fscruffylookingcatherder.com%2farchive%2f2008%2f01%2f22%2ftdd-proven-effective-or-is-it.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fscruffylookingcatherder.com%2farchive%2f2008%2f01%2f22%2ftdd-proven-effective-or-is-it.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/TDD_Proven_Effective_Or_is_it</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/TDD_Proven_Effective_Or_is_it</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dependency Injection Objection</title>
      <description>&amp;quot;The amount of heat I anticipate receiving is so disproportional to the probable light gained that it makes me hesitate.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fscruffylookingcatherder.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f12%2f10%2fdependency-injection-objection.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fscruffylookingcatherder.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f12%2f10%2fdependency-injection-objection.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Dependency_Injection_Objection</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Dependency_Injection_Objection</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:01:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bug Driven Development</title>
      <description>Phil Haack says that if you don't pick a better methodology, you'll slip into Bug Driven Development. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f09%2f24%2fbug-driven-development.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f09%2f24%2fbug-driven-development.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Bug_Driven_Development</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Bug_Driven_Development</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:31:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deciding When to Use Depencency Injection</title>
      <description>Expressing the struggles of deciding when to use Dependency Injection and, more importantly, when not to use it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fscruffylookingcatherder.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f09%2f18%2fdeciding-when-to-use-di.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fscruffylookingcatherder.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f09%2f18%2fdeciding-when-to-use-di.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Deciding_When_to_Use_Depencency_Injection</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Deciding_When_to_Use_Depencency_Injection</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Open source .NET libraries you should be already using</title>
      <description>As we know, there are many good, enterprise level, open source libraries, frameworks and projects implemented in Java. Most of them are being ported into different platforms like .NET and PHP, so developers are migrating to the these platforms with their familiar tools. For example, i have been using Ant, JUnit, Log4J, iText and many mores when i was developing in Java, but now i am still using Log4Net and Nunit in my current &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.plentyofcode.com%2f2007%2f07%2fopen-source-net-libraries-you-should-be.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.plentyofcode.com%2f2007%2f07%2fopen-source-net-libraries-you-should-be.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Open_source_NET_libraries_you_should_be_already_using</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Open_source_NET_libraries_you_should_be_already_using</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:46:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Self-Contained Unit Tests</title>
      <description>Using content files to put configuration and test files in the executing directory for Unit Test dlls helps keep your Unit Tests free of external dependencies. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fscruffylookingcatherder.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f07%2f19%2fself-contained-unit-tests.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fscruffylookingcatherder.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f07%2f19%2fself-contained-unit-tests.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Self_Contained_Unit_Tests</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Self_Contained_Unit_Tests</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:18:12 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>19 Eponymous Laws Of Software Development</title>
      <description>My favourite - Hofstadter's Law: &amp;quot;A task always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f07%2f17%2fthe-eponymous-laws-of-software-development.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f07%2f17%2fthe-eponymous-laws-of-software-development.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/19_Eponymous_Laws_Of_Software_Development</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/19_Eponymous_Laws_Of_Software_Development</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 06:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lightbox and Subtext Galleries Integration </title>
      <description>integrate Lightbox JS into Subtext's photo galleries  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fstevenharman.net%2fblog%2farchive%2f2007%2f06%2f24%2flightbox-and-subtext-galleries-integration.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fstevenharman.net%2fblog%2farchive%2f2007%2f06%2f24%2flightbox-and-subtext-galleries-integration.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Lightbox_and_Subtext_Galleries_Integration</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Lightbox_and_Subtext_Galleries_Integration</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:16:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SubSonic DOH Moments - CreatedBy and ModifiedBy</title>
      <description>In this first post in a series of posts called SubSonic DOH! Moments I cover a few handy tips I've stumbled across along the way - essentialy mistakes I've made and lessons learned. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fscribesonic.com%2fBlog%2fArchive%2f2007%2f06%2f22%2fSubSonic-DOH-Moments---CreatedBy-and-ModifiedBy.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fscribesonic.com%2fBlog%2fArchive%2f2007%2f06%2f22%2fSubSonic-DOH-Moments---CreatedBy-and-ModifiedBy.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/SubSonic_DOH_Moments_CreatedBy_and_ModifiedBy</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/SubSonic_DOH_Moments_CreatedBy_and_ModifiedBy</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Asshole driven development</title>
      <description>The software industry might be the world's greatest breeding ground for new systems of management. From Agile, to Extreme Programming , to Test Driven Development (TDD), the acronyms and frameworks keep piling up. Why? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.scottberkun.com%2fblog%2f2007%2fasshole-driven-development%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.scottberkun.com%2fblog%2f2007%2fasshole-driven-development%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Asshole_driven_development</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Asshole_driven_development</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I CAN HAS A .NET COMPILR?</title>
      <description>A programming language with compilers for many platforms including .NET, based on the captions featured in the popular LOLCat images found in the Internet.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sorn.net%2f%3fpostid%3d88"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sorn.net%2f%3fpostid%3d88" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/clr/I_CAN_HAS_A_NET_COMPILR</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/clr/I_CAN_HAS_A_NET_COMPILR</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 06:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unit Test Web Code Without A Web Server Using HttpSimulator</title>
      <description>Haacked introduces a new HttpSimulator class that he put together to help you unit test your asp.net code. Fluent interface, access to session and application variables, a working MapPath... wow! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f06%2f19%2funit-tests-web-code-without-a-web-server-using-httpsimulator.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f06%2f19%2funit-tests-web-code-without-a-web-server-using-httpsimulator.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Unit_Test_Web_Code_Without_A_Web_Server_Using_HttpSimulator</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Unit_Test_Web_Code_Without_A_Web_Server_Using_HttpSimulator</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:16:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Most Useful .NET Utility Classes Developers Tend To Reinvent Rathe</title>
      <description>Useful framework tips on paths from Phil Haack. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f06%2f13%2fthe-most-useful-.net-utility-classes-developers-tend-to-reinvent.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f06%2f13%2fthe-most-useful-.net-utility-classes-developers-tend-to-reinvent.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/clr/The_Most_Useful_NET_Utility_Classes_Developers_Tend_To_Reinvent_Rathe</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/clr/The_Most_Useful_NET_Utility_Classes_Developers_Tend_To_Reinvent_Rathe</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 05:46:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sql Server: IsNullOrEmpty function </title>
      <description>A familiar C# function in T-SQL. 
Usefull to keep it handy &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.sqlteam.com%2fmladenp%2farchive%2f2007%2f06%2f13%2f60231.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.sqlteam.com%2fmladenp%2farchive%2f2007%2f06%2f13%2f60231.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/Sql_Server_IsNullOrEmpty_function</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/Sql_Server_IsNullOrEmpty_function</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:01:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tip: Put Connection Strings in Their Own Configuration File</title>
      <description>This post explain how to split the connection string out into a new configuration file, user.config. Doing this should make day to day development easier for our development team by reducing the number of merge conflicts in web.config.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fstevenharman.net%2fblog%2farchive%2f2007%2f06%2f07%2ftip-put-connection-strings-in-their-own-configuration-file.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fstevenharman.net%2fblog%2farchive%2f2007%2f06%2f07%2ftip-put-connection-strings-in-their-own-configuration-file.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Tip_Put_Connection_Strings_in_Their_Own_Configuration_File</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Tip_Put_Connection_Strings_in_Their_Own_Configuration_File</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The True Story Behind LINQ to SQL</title>
      <description>An architect's story of how LINQ to SQL came to be. 
&amp;quot;For the sake of LINQ and the customer in general, we took up the OR/M torch officially, announcing our intention internally and starting the political nightmare that became my life for the next three years.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2fmattwar%2farchive%2f2007%2f05%2f31%2fthe-origin-of-linq-to-sql.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2fmattwar%2farchive%2f2007%2f05%2f31%2fthe-origin-of-linq-to-sql.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/The_True_Story_Behind_LINQ_to_SQL</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/The_True_Story_Behind_LINQ_to_SQL</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 05:01:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Strongly-typed Stored Procedures Using ADO.Net</title>
      <description>The evils of relying on MS DAAB for stored procedures is overcome by using ADO.Net 2.0 for the built-in strongly-typed access to stored procedures. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fscruffylookingcatherder.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f05%2f30%2fms-daab-is-eeeeviiiiil.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fscruffylookingcatherder.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f05%2f30%2fms-daab-is-eeeeviiiiil.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/Strongly_typed_Stored_Procedures_Using_ADO_Net</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/Strongly_typed_Stored_Procedures_Using_ADO_Net</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 10:43:21 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Strongly Typed Stored Procedures Using Subsonic</title>
      <description>In general, Subsonic is most productive when combining its code generation with its dynamic query engine and Active Record. But sometimes, your stuck with Stored Procedures and want to make the best of it. Subsonic, via the sonic.exe command line tool, can generate strongly typed stored procedure wrappers saving you from writing a lot of boilerplate code. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f05%2f29%2fstrongly-typed-stored-procedures-using-subsonic.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f05%2f29%2fstrongly-typed-stored-procedures-using-subsonic.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/Strongly_Typed_Stored_Procedures_Using_Subsonic</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/Strongly_Typed_Stored_Procedures_Using_Subsonic</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 08:46:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sierpinski Triangle - An Introduction into Silverlight by Example</title>
      <description>I've put together a beginner's introduction into Silverlight on CodeProject.com. The article covers how to use Silverlight to create the famous Sierpinki Triangle fractal. It's really meant to help someone who wants to create their first Silverlight experience, but then again maybe that's you? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codeproject.com%2fuseritems%2fSierpinskiTriangle.asp"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codeproject.com%2fuseritems%2fSierpinskiTriangle.asp" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/wpf/Sierpinski_Triangle_An_Introduction_into_Silverlight_by_Example</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/wpf/Sierpinski_Triangle_An_Introduction_into_Silverlight_by_Example</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 07:16:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EntitySpaces 2007 Released</title>
      <description>The EntitySpaces 2007 (ES2007) Architecture for the Microsoft .NET Framework was released to production on May 28th, 2007.

The EntitySpaces team would like to thank both our customers and those evaluating EntitySpaces for working hand in hand with us on the ES2007 release. The first ES2007 beta was posted on March 4th and thus began the customer feedback / defect reporting cycle with new versions following quickly as advancements were made. You have truly helped us to make EntitySpaces 2007 a very solid offering for those developing for the Microsoft .NET Framework. We are particularly pleased with some of the mobile development that is beginning to take root. We strive hard through our forums to hear you and allow you to shape the architecture you have invested in. We also work very hard to provide high quality support on our forums and to make ourselves available to our customers.

ES2007 is a major advancement over it's predecessor (1.5.3) released on December 30th, 2006, these are just some of the new features. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.entityspaces.net%2fblog%2fEntitySpaces2007ReleasedToProduction.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.entityspaces.net%2fblog%2fEntitySpaces2007ReleasedToProduction.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/EntitySpaces_2007_Released</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/EntitySpaces_2007_Released</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 00:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>