<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com : Stories kicked by JanVanRyswyck</title>
    <description>Stories kicked by JanVanRyswyck</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Identifing Waste, the Lean Way</title>
      <description>As mentioned in a previous blog post, waste elimination is usually the most obvious and least resistant way to improve value and flow in a product.  So I'm just going to jump right into some of the waste factors that are usually easy to identify, evaluate, modify and sustain their solutions in software product development.  Not going to cover all forms of waste, just the most common ones. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fraymond.lewallen%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f04%2fidentifing-waste-the-lean-way.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fraymond.lewallen%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f04%2fidentifing-waste-the-lean-way.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Identifing_Waste_the_Lean_Way</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Identifing_Waste_the_Lean_Way</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:57:20 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MSpec v0.2</title>
      <description>It's been a while, but we've gotten several new things into Machine.Specifications (MSpec). I'm excited to finally release them for everyone to start playing with. You can grab the bits here.

Let's talk about what's new though. Here's an example of a new context/spec: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2faaron.jensen%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f02%2fmspec-v0-2.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2faaron.jensen%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f02%2fmspec-v0-2.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/MSpec_v0_2</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/MSpec_v0_2</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:02:22 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alt.NET Podcast Episode 9: The State of IronRuby</title>
      <description>Learn about Ruby, why you should check it out, and what the status is on the IronRuby project, &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2faltnetpodcast.com%2fepisodes%2f9-state-of-ironruby"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2faltnetpodcast.com%2fepisodes%2f9-state-of-ironruby" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Alt_NET_Podcast_Episode_9_The_State_of_IronRuby</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Alt_NET_Podcast_Episode_9_The_State_of_IronRuby</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:31:13 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Community Reality Check: Is INETA a concrete life raft? </title>
      <description>As an attempt to continually improve my contributions to the community, I'm trying to determine the value I'm generating through the volunteering of my time.  What, dear reader, would you say is INETA's place in today's ever changing world of .NET? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fevan_hoff%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f25%2fcommunity-reality-check-is-ineta-a-concrete-life-raft.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fevan_hoff%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f25%2fcommunity-reality-check-is-ineta-a-concrete-life-raft.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Community_Reality_Check_Is_INETA_a_concrete_life_raft</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Community_Reality_Check_Is_INETA_a_concrete_life_raft</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 02:49:18 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NHibernate 2.0 is out</title>
      <description>Directly from the blog of Ayende, NHibernate 2.0 is out!! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fayende.com%2fBlog%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f23%2fNHibernate-2.0-Final-is-out.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fayende.com%2fBlog%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f23%2fNHibernate-2.0-Final-is-out.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/NHibernate_2_0_is_out</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/NHibernate_2_0_is_out</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>rules for spartan programmers : Using NDepend Query Techniques</title>
      <description>Excellent content as always from the genius behind NDepend.

 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fpatricksmacchia%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f05%2frules-for-spartan-programmers.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fpatricksmacchia%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f05%2frules-for-spartan-programmers.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/rules_for_spartan_programmers_Using_NDepend_Query_Techniques</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/rules_for_spartan_programmers_Using_NDepend_Query_Techniques</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:23:41 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Onion Architecture</title>
      <description>The fundamental rule is that all code can depend on layers more central, but code cannot depend on layers further out from the core.  This architecture is unashamedly biased toward object-oriented programming, and it puts objects before all others. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fjeffreypalermo.com%2fblog%2fthe-onion-architecture-part-1%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fjeffreypalermo.com%2fblog%2fthe-onion-architecture-part-1%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/The_Onion_Architecture</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/The_Onion_Architecture</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 7: Talking Domain-Driven Design with David Laribee - Part 2</title>
      <description>Domain-driven design (DDD) is an approach to the design of software, based on two premises. For most software projects, the primary focus should be on the domain and domain logic (as opposed to being the particular technology used to implement the system) and complex domain designs should be based on a model. David Laribee wraps up his discussion with hosts Keith and Woody about the growing design practice and how it can be used with the .NET platform. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdeepfriedbytes.com%2fpodcast%2fepisode-7-talking-domain-driven-design-with-david-laribee-ndash-part-2%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdeepfriedbytes.com%2fpodcast%2fepisode-7-talking-domain-driven-design-with-david-laribee-ndash-part-2%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Episode_7_Talking_Domain_Driven_Design_with_David_Laribee_Part_2</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Episode_7_Talking_Domain_Driven_Design_with_David_Laribee_Part_2</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Arrange Act Assert and BDD specifications</title>
      <description>With Rhino Mocks 3.5 just around the corner, I've started using it to create much more readable tests.  One of the things that always bothered me with Expect.Call, constraints and the like was that it mixed in the Arrange with Assert.  For those that haven't heard of AAA, it's a pattern for authoring unit tests:

    * Arrange - set up the unit under test
    * Act - exercise the unit under test, capturing any resulting state
    * Assert - verify the behavior through assertions

As I moved towards BDD context/specification style tests, working with Rhino Mocks didn't fit the picture very well.  But with the new AAA syntax of Rhino Mocks 3.5, I can very cleanly separate out the behavior I want to observe from the mechanics of setting up the test. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fjimmy_bogard%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f24%2farrange-act-assert-and-bdd-specifications.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fjimmy_bogard%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f24%2farrange-act-assert-and-bdd-specifications.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Arrange_Act_Assert_and_BDD_specifications</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Arrange_Act_Assert_and_BDD_specifications</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 05:46:11 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ALT.NET Podcast 8 - EF Vote of No Confidence (part 2 of Episode 7)</title>
      <description>In this episode Jeremy Miller and Ward Bell (from IdeaBlade) discuss the Vote of No Confidence on Microsoft's Entity Framework and what it means for the Alt.NET and .NET communities &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2faltnetpodcast.com%2fepisodes%2f8-vote-of-no-confidence"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2faltnetpodcast.com%2fepisodes%2f8-vote-of-no-confidence" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/ALT_NET_Podcast_8_EF_Vote_of_No_Confidence_part_2_of_Episode_7</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/ALT_NET_Podcast_8_EF_Vote_of_No_Confidence_part_2_of_Episode_7</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:31:06 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Foundations of Programming - Learning Application</title>
      <description>If you're anything like me, you probably learn a lot better by going through code rather than reading books. I'm happy to release the Foundations of Programming Learning Application - it's a complete solution meant to show what was covered in the Foundations series. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fkarlseguin%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f18%2ffoundations-of-programming-learning-application.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fkarlseguin%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f18%2ffoundations-of-programming-learning-application.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Foundations_of_Programming_Learning_Application</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Foundations_of_Programming_Learning_Application</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:46:10 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Seperations of concerns</title>
      <description>This is the 5th and last part in a series on hoow to make a bad application better. Wonderfully explained. There is a lot to learn from this. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fjimmy_bogard%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f17%2fseparation-of-concerns-by-example-part-5.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fjimmy_bogard%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f17%2fseparation-of-concerns-by-example-part-5.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Seperations_of_concerns</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Seperations_of_concerns</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:31:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Project anti-pattern: Many projects in a Visual Studio Solution File</title>
      <description>I've been hearing from several colleagues about how their Visual Studio solution files have many (i.e. more than 10, and usually more than 30 -- in one case, more than 100!).  So far, none of them have been able to give me any good explanation for why this is and most of them hate it but they can't change it because their architect/lead/whatever won't let them.

I'm hoping that by getting the discussion going on this in the greater community, we can try to discourage everyone from having lots of projects in a solution.   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fchad_myers%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f15%2fproject-anti-pattern-many-projects-in-a-visual-studio-solution-file.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fchad_myers%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f15%2fproject-anti-pattern-many-projects-in-a-visual-studio-solution-file.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Project_anti_pattern_Many_projects_in_a_Visual_Studio_Solution_File</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Project_anti_pattern_Many_projects_in_a_Visual_Studio_Solution_File</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:46:06 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 6: Talking Domain-Driven Design with David Laribee - Part 1</title>
      <description>Domain-driven design (DDD) is an approach to the design of software, based on two premises. For most software projects, the primary focus should be on the domain and domain logic (as opposed to being the particular technology used to implement the system) and complex domain designs should be based on a model. David Laribee sat down with the hosts Keith and Woody to discuss this growing design practice and also discuss how it could be used with the .NET platform. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdeepfriedbytes.com%2fpodcast%2fepisode-6-talking-domain-driven-design-with-david-laribee-part-1%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdeepfriedbytes.com%2fpodcast%2fepisode-6-talking-domain-driven-design-with-david-laribee-part-1%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Episode_6_Talking_Domain_Driven_Design_with_David_Laribee_Part_1</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Episode_6_Talking_Domain_Driven_Design_with_David_Laribee_Part_1</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:31:06 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC preview release 4 - part 1</title>
      <description>The ASP.NET MVC team is in the final stages of finishing up a new &amp;quot;Preview 4&amp;quot; release that they hope to ship later this week.  The Preview 3 release focused on finishing up a lot of the underlying core APIs and extensibility points in ASP.NET MVC.  Starting with Preview 4 this week you'll start to see more and more higher level features begin to appear that build on top of the core foundation and add nice productivity.

There are a bunch of new features and capabilities in this new build - so much in fact that I decided I needed two posts to cover them all.  This first post will cover the new Caching, Error Handling and Security features in Preview 4, as well as some testing improvements it brings.  My next post will cover the new AJAX features being added with this release as well.
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fscottgu%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f14%2fasp-net-mvc-preview-4-release-part-1.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fscottgu%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f14%2fasp-net-mvc-preview-4-release-part-1.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_MVC_preview_release_4_part_1</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_MVC_preview_release_4_part_1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:01:09 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can someone tell me why i shouldn't drop WCF?</title>
      <description>In this post i question the usage of a WCF service layer instead of going for a NServiceBus based messaging approach &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdavybrion.com%2fblog%2f2008%2f07%2fcan-someone-tell-me-why-i-shouldnt-drop-wcf%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdavybrion.com%2fblog%2f2008%2f07%2fcan-someone-tell-me-why-i-shouldnt-drop-wcf%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/webservices/Can_someone_tell_me_why_i_shouldn_t_drop_WCF</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/webservices/Can_someone_tell_me_why_i_shouldn_t_drop_WCF</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alt.NET Podcast Episode 7 - Object-Relational Mapping</title>
      <description>In this episode Ward Bell (from IdeaBlade) and Jeremy Miller discuss Object-Relational Mapping and when to use ORM tools. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2faltnetpodcast.com%2fepisodes%2f7-object-relational-mapping"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2faltnetpodcast.com%2fepisodes%2f7-object-relational-mapping" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Alt_NET_Podcast_Episode_7_Object_Relational_Mapping</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Alt_NET_Podcast_Episode_7_Object_Relational_Mapping</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Doctors We Ain't</title>
      <description>Software developers and architects don't have all the answers... but who does? Dave discusses some common patterns for figuring out our role in the great game of software. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fdavid_laribee%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f10%2fdoctors-we-ain-t.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fdavid_laribee%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f10%2fdoctors-we-ain-t.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Doctors_We_Ain_t</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Doctors_We_Ain_t</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:50:13 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Aggiorno, the Italian colleague you've always wanted</title>
      <description>Review of the new Aggiorno plugin for Visual Studio 2005 and 2008 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fpeter.worksontheweb.net%2fpost%2fAggiorno2c-the-Italian-colleague-youve-always-wanted.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fpeter.worksontheweb.net%2fpost%2fAggiorno2c-the-Italian-colleague-youve-always-wanted.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Aggiorno_the_Italian_colleague_you_ve_always_wanted</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Aggiorno_the_Italian_colleague_you_ve_always_wanted</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:31:09 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Scale with Memcached on .NET</title>
      <description>Though .NET apps scale well thanks to caching, you can always use Memcached to scale further. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fkarlseguin%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f07%2fscale-cheaply-memcached.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fkarlseguin%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f07%2fscale-cheaply-memcached.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/How_to_Scale_with_Memcached_on_NET</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/How_to_Scale_with_Memcached_on_NET</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do You have the Time to Learn Everything?</title>
      <description>.Net is huge, and constantly. Do you have the time to learn everything? If no, how should you prioritize? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fitscommonsensestupid.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f07%2fdo-you-have-time-to-learn-everything.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fitscommonsensestupid.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f07%2fdo-you-have-time-to-learn-everything.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Do_You_have_the_Time_to_Learn_Everything</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Do_You_have_the_Time_to_Learn_Everything</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:31:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NDepend: code metrics at your service</title>
      <description>If you ever wrote code for a non-trivial project chances are that from time to time you stop an think: &amp;quot;I don't know, but I have the feeling that the code is not really clean/too complex/[insert adjective here that makes you feel bad about your code]&amp;quot;. Chances are even that you did not had these thoughts - but your source code indeed was not really clean, too complex or what not. While the latter situation is certainly the worse of the two, both situation make clear that we need means to quantify the quality of our code. NDepend is an excellent tool that can be used to generate those metrics &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.andreloker.de%2fpost%2f2008%2f07%2f08%2fNDepend-code-metrics-at-your-service.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.andreloker.de%2fpost%2f2008%2f07%2f08%2fNDepend-code-metrics-at-your-service.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/NDepend_code_metrics_at_your_service</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/NDepend_code_metrics_at_your_service</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 18:31:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Exploring ShadeTree Features, Part 1: Static Reflection with Reflectio</title>
      <description>Some beautiful code. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fchad_myers%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f06%2fexploring-shadetree-features-part-1-static-reflection-with-reflectionhelper.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fchad_myers%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f06%2fexploring-shadetree-features-part-1-static-reflection-with-reflectionhelper.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Exploring_ShadeTree_Features_Part_1_Static_Reflection_with_Reflectio</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Exploring_ShadeTree_Features_Part_1_Static_Reflection_with_Reflectio</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:31:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>.NET Developers' Reference Card Round-Up</title>
      <description>I thought I would share this list of reference cards / cheat sheets that I have compiled over the last year or so. If I am missing any good ones, please post them in the comments. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.alvinashcraft.com%2f2008%2f07%2f07%2fnet-developers-reference-card-roundup%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.alvinashcraft.com%2f2008%2f07%2f07%2fnet-developers-reference-card-roundup%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/tipsandtricks/NET_Developers_Reference_Card_Round_Up</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/tipsandtricks/NET_Developers_Reference_Card_Round_Up</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 03:31:09 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Looking at Rhino Mocks 3.5 (RC1)</title>
      <description>Looking at some of the new goodies in Rhino Mocks 3.5 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2felegantcode.com%2f2008%2f06%2f29%2flooking-at-rhino-mocks-35-rc1%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2felegantcode.com%2f2008%2f06%2f29%2flooking-at-rhino-mocks-35-rc1%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Looking_at_Rhino_Mocks_3_5_RC1</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Looking_at_Rhino_Mocks_3_5_RC1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:47:51 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>