<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com : Stories kicked by JanVanRyswyck</title>
    <description>Stories kicked by JanVanRyswyck</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Castle Windsor 2.0 RTM Released!</title>
      <description>Some would say that it is about time, I would agree. Windsor might not be the OSS project in pre release state for the longest time (I think that the honor belong to Hurd), but it spent enough time at that state to at least deserve a honorary mention. f you will look, you won't find Windsor 1.0, only release candidates for 1.0. As I believe I mentioned, Windsor has been production ready for a long time, and for the full release we decided to skip the 1.0 designator, which doesn't really fit, and go directly to 2.0 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fayende.com%2fBlog%2farchive%2f2009%2f05%2f05%2fcastle-windsor-2.0-rtm-released.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fayende.com%2fBlog%2farchive%2f2009%2f05%2f05%2fcastle-windsor-2.0-rtm-released.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Castle_Windsor_2_0_RTM_Released</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Castle_Windsor_2_0_RTM_Released</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NH2.1: Executable HQL</title>
      <description>New feature in NHibernate &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2ffabiomaulo.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f05%2fnh21-executable-hql.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2ffabiomaulo.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f05%2fnh21-executable-hql.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/NH2_1_Executable_HQL</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/NH2_1_Executable_HQL</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 13:15:57 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kobe - Oh Dear Lord Why?!</title>
      <description>Karl Seguin weighs in on the latest MS ASP.NET MVC sample app &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fkarlseguin%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f16%2fkobe-oh-dead-lord-why.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fkarlseguin%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f16%2fkobe-oh-dead-lord-why.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/Kobe_Oh_Dear_Lord_Why</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/Kobe_Oh_Dear_Lord_Why</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fluent ADO.NET (there's actually a good reason for it!)</title>
      <description>More DAL silliness, but for a good reason. The author was restricted from using an ORM by his client so he came up with a cool way to make his life a little easier. Pretty cool. Scratch that itch! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2felegantcode.com%2f2009%2f04%2f13%2fintroducing-fluent-adonet%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2felegantcode.com%2f2009%2f04%2f13%2fintroducing-fluent-adonet%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/Fluent_ADO_NET_there_s_actually_a_good_reason_for_it</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/Fluent_ADO_NET_there_s_actually_a_good_reason_for_it</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Talking with Jeremy Miller about Alt.Net</title>
      <description>As a follow up to the last podcast that featured Mike Moore and Scott Bellware discussing Alt.Net I spoke with Jeremy Miller to put out a vision for what he feels Alt.Net should represent and how it can be a positive thing in the community. This will be the last episode here on this topic, I promise to get back to normal technology discussions (next episode is about BDD and TDD). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2faltnetpodcast.com%2fepisodes%2f18-talking-with-jeremy-miller-about-alt-net"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2faltnetpodcast.com%2fepisodes%2f18-talking-with-jeremy-miller-about-alt-net" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/altnet/Talking_with_Jeremy_Miller_about_Alt_Net</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/altnet/Talking_with_Jeremy_Miller_about_Alt_Net</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:16:17 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ivory tower policies or mandates are counter productive</title>
      <description>You know its true. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicious.com%2fblogs%2fderik_whittaker%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f19%2fivory-tower-policies-or-mandates-are-counter-productive.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicious.com%2fblogs%2fderik_whittaker%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f19%2fivory-tower-policies-or-mandates-are-counter-productive.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Ivory_tower_policies_or_mandates_are_counter_productive</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Ivory_tower_policies_or_mandates_are_counter_productive</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:19:22 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What makes a system hard to work with?</title>
      <description>What makes a system hard to work with?
... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fjeremy.miller%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f12%2fwhat-makes-a-system-hard-to-work-with.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fjeremy.miller%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f12%2fwhat-makes-a-system-hard-to-work-with.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/altnet/What_makes_a_system_hard_to_work_with</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/altnet/What_makes_a_system_hard_to_work_with</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:41:36 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Nick Stakenburg Bullying His Open-Source 'Competitor'</title>
      <description>This is obviously a scare tactic used by a vendor to frighten a 'competitor' who is encroachinig on his sales. Nick (the vendor) is jarred by the fact that someone has released a comparable (better?) product that his and it is free. It behaves somewhat the same, so obviously it was copied...
This is a serious issue, we can't let companies push around open-source with threats like this. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fnaspinski.net%2fpost%2fIs-Nick-Stakenburg-bullying-his-open-source-competitor.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fnaspinski.net%2fpost%2fIs-Nick-Stakenburg-bullying-his-open-source-competitor.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/jquery/Is_Nick_Stakenburg_Bullying_His_Open_Source_Competitor</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/jquery/Is_Nick_Stakenburg_Bullying_His_Open_Source_Competitor</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Back to Basics: Interfaces</title>
      <description>When it comes to object-oriented programming there are few concepts as basic and important as interfaces. Only recently though, and at a snails pace, have .NET developers started to take advantage of the simple benefits interfaces have to offer. This interest stems from the core role interfaces play in some pretty hot topics, including: dependency injection, unit testing and mocking (to name a few). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fkarlseguin%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f04%2fback-to-basics-interfaces.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fkarlseguin%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f04%2fback-to-basics-interfaces.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Back_to_Basics_Interfaces</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Back_to_Basics_Interfaces</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:46:09 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alt.Net Podcast: The State of IronRuby 2009</title>
      <description>A quick update on the state of the IronRuby project with John Lam. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2faltnetpodcast.com%2fepisodes%2f16-state-of-ironruby-2009"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2faltnetpodcast.com%2fepisodes%2f16-state-of-ironruby-2009" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/altnet/Alt_Net_Podcast_The_State_of_IronRuby_2009</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/altnet/Alt_Net_Podcast_The_State_of_IronRuby_2009</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:31:13 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Understand closures with JavaScript</title>
      <description>Closures are a programming concept that can be a bit intimidating but it shouldn't be this way. Hopefully this short article can clarify how that works and how to avoid problems when using it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicio.us%2fblogs%2fsergio_pereira%2farchive%2f2009%2f02%2f23%2fjavascript-time-to-grok-closures.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicio.us%2fblogs%2fsergio_pereira%2farchive%2f2009%2f02%2f23%2fjavascript-time-to-grok-closures.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ajax/Understand_closures_with_JavaScript</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ajax/Understand_closures_with_JavaScript</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A response to Validation in a DDD world </title>
      <description>Jimmy Bogard presented a well written argument for always keeping validation out of entities in a domain driven design except in &amp;quot;the absolute worst case.&amp;quot;  But, IMO, there is simply no black and white verdict on where validation must live in a DDD application and must be carefully considered at the beginning of any project, taking into consideration the motivations behind validation, the scope of the project, the maturity of the development team, and the balance between philosophical purity and practical maintainability. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicio.us%2fblogs%2fbilly_mccafferty%2farchive%2f2009%2f02%2f17%2fa-response-to-validation-in-a-ddd-world.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicio.us%2fblogs%2fbilly_mccafferty%2farchive%2f2009%2f02%2f17%2fa-response-to-validation-in-a-ddd-world.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/A_response_to_Validation_in_a_DDD_world</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/A_response_to_Validation_in_a_DDD_world</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 03:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Quick Example of YAGNI / Simplest Thing Possible in Action</title>
      <description>If you've ever worked on an Agile/XP team you've surely heard something in the lines of &amp;quot;Let's YAGNI that. (YAGNI == You aren't gonna need it)&amp;quot;  You've probably also heard the phrase &amp;quot;do the simplest thing that could possibly work.&amp;quot;  Both of these sayings are an exhortion to developers to avoid overdesign and analysis/paralysis by focusing on the here and now instead of getting caught up in designing for a conjectural need.  I called YAGNI on something today. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fjeremy.miller%2farchive%2f2009%2f02%2f17%2fa-quick-example-of-yagni-simplest-thing-possible-in-action.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fjeremy.miller%2farchive%2f2009%2f02%2f17%2fa-quick-example-of-yagni-simplest-thing-possible-in-action.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/A_Quick_Example_of_YAGNI_Simplest_Thing_Possible_in_Action</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/A_Quick_Example_of_YAGNI_Simplest_Thing_Possible_in_Action</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:16:14 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Announcing my book: ASP.NET MVC 1.0 Quickly</title>
      <description>Maarten Balliauw announces his new book and provides a large retrospective on the writing process itself. Must read for everyone thinking about writing a tech book! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.maartenballiauw.be%2fpost%2f2009%2f02%2f17%2fAnnouncing-my-book-ASPNET-MVC-10-Quickly.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.maartenballiauw.be%2fpost%2f2009%2f02%2f17%2fAnnouncing-my-book-ASPNET-MVC-10-Quickly.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/Announcing_my_book_ASP_NET_MVC_1_0_Quickly</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/Announcing_my_book_ASP_NET_MVC_1_0_Quickly</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DDD command query separation as an architectural concept</title>
      <description>Another one of the excellent serie on DDD by casey. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicio.us%2fblogs%2fcasey%2farchive%2f2009%2f02%2f12%2fddd-command-query-separation-as-an-architectural-concept.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevlicio.us%2fblogs%2fcasey%2farchive%2f2009%2f02%2f12%2fddd-command-query-separation-as-an-architectural-concept.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/DDD_command_query_separation_as_an_architectural_concept</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/DDD_command_query_separation_as_an_architectural_concept</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:46:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Today I've Realized How Far We Have To Go</title>
      <description>A call to climb on the shoulders of giants within the software develeopment industry. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f02%2f11%2fToday-Ive-Realized-How-Far-We-Have-To-Go.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f02%2f11%2fToday-Ive-Realized-How-Far-We-Have-To-Go.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Today_I_ve_Realized_How_Far_We_Have_To_Go</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Today_I_ve_Realized_How_Far_We_Have_To_Go</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cost? (Cost of Messaging)</title>
      <description>We have come to a very very very important question. What is the cost of Command Query Separation and Messaging in general in comparison to say a more traditional architecture?

I would like to look at this from two perspectives. The first perspective is that of the actual cost of using the types of methodologies I bring up. In other words what physical overhead can we see as a result of making the choice? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fgregyoung%2farchive%2f2009%2f02%2f09%2fcost.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fgregyoung%2farchive%2f2009%2f02%2f09%2fcost.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/patterns/Cost_Cost_of_Messaging</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/patterns/Cost_Cost_of_Messaging</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:31:17 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NH2.1.0: New generators</title>
      <description>NHibernate new identity-style generators available for various dialects. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2ffabiomaulo.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f02%2fnh210-new-generators.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2ffabiomaulo.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f02%2fnh210-new-generators.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/NH2_1_0_New_generators</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/NH2_1_0_New_generators</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 07:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why aren't I an MVP?</title>
      <description>There's a problem with the MVP program I'd like to talk about. The fact that I'm no longer an MVP (haven't been for over a year now) isn't the problem, merely a symptom. My problem is that I don't know why I'm not an MVP, and by extension I don't know why others are. The process of becoming and remaining an MVP is completely opaque. Plainly, the MVP program lacks transparency. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fkarlseguin%2farchive%2f2009%2f02%2f03%2fwhy-aren-t-i-an-mvp.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fkarlseguin%2farchive%2f2009%2f02%2f03%2fwhy-aren-t-i-an-mvp.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Why_aren_t_I_an_MVP</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Why_aren_t_I_an_MVP</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:16:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&amp;quot;Quality Doesn't Matter That Much&amp;quot; -- Jeff and Joel </title>
      <description>I was riding my exercise bike, listening to Stack Overflow #38 when I heard Jeff Atwood and Joel Spolsky say &amp;quot;Quality just doesn't matter that much.&amp;quot; I nearly fell off my bike. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.objectmentor.com%2farticles%2f2009%2f01%2f31%2fquality-doesnt-matter-that-much-jeff-and-joel"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.objectmentor.com%2farticles%2f2009%2f01%2f31%2fquality-doesnt-matter-that-much-jeff-and-joel" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/patterns/Quality_Doesn_t_Matter_That_Much_Jeff_and_Joel</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/patterns/Quality_Doesn_t_Matter_That_Much_Jeff_and_Joel</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 06:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Welcome to the anemic age</title>
      <description> ... where we stop using the OO goodness and go back to procedural programming. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fgregyoung%2farchive%2f2009%2f01%2f22%2fthe-data-centric-universe.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fgregyoung%2farchive%2f2009%2f01%2f22%2fthe-data-centric-universe.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Welcome_to_the_anemic_age</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Welcome_to_the_anemic_age</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:57:57 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Visual Studio 2010 == Visual Studio 2008 + ReSharper</title>
      <description>o you want the next gen of next-gen applications? Get the Visual Studio 2010 CTP! Which is - according to Microsoft itself - really just Visual Studio 2008 with ReSharper installed. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fjames.kovacs%2farchive%2f2009%2f01%2f19%2fvisual-studio-2010-visual-studio-2008-resharper.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fjames.kovacs%2farchive%2f2009%2f01%2f19%2fvisual-studio-2010-visual-studio-2008-resharper.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Visual_Studio_2010_Visual_Studio_2008_ReSharper</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Visual_Studio_2010_Visual_Studio_2008_ReSharper</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:31:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Repository&amp;lt;T&amp;gt; good or bad?</title>
      <description>Greg took a bite on current ALT .Net hot topic: Generic repositories

 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fgregyoung%2farchive%2f2009%2f01%2f16%2fddd-the-generic-repository.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fgregyoung%2farchive%2f2009%2f01%2f16%2fddd-the-generic-repository.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/altnet/Repository_T_good_or_bad</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/altnet/Repository_T_good_or_bad</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:01:06 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NHibernate.Linq Alpha Released</title>
      <description>NHibernate.Linq is a Linq provider for NHibernate 2.0.1 GA.  It processes 
Linq expressions using NHibernate's Criteria API.  This release is meant as 
a stopgap release pending an implementation not reliant on the Criteria 
API.  Most queries are supported with the exception of the following: 
   - Group Joins 
   - Subqueries in select clause &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fgroups.google.com%2fgroup%2fnhusers%2fbrowse_thread%2fthread%2fb7a3f537f4cbf46d"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fgroups.google.com%2fgroup%2fnhusers%2fbrowse_thread%2fthread%2fb7a3f537f4cbf46d" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/linq/NHibernate_Linq_Alpha_Released</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/linq/NHibernate_Linq_Alpha_Released</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ALT.NET Podcast Episode 15: Domain Driven Design</title>
      <description>Talking with Rob Conery and James Avery about Domain Driven Design. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2faltnetpodcast.com%2fepisodes%2f15-domain-driven-design"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2faltnetpodcast.com%2fepisodes%2f15-domain-driven-design" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/ALT_NET_Podcast_Episode_15_Domain_Driven_Design</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/ALT_NET_Podcast_Episode_15_Domain_Driven_Design</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:31:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>