<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com : Stories kicked by MarkFreedman</title>
    <description>Stories kicked by MarkFreedman</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>DotNetKicks to be Open Sourced</title>
      <description>As the community on DotNetKicks.com has grown in size over the past year, I have received received many offers of help with adding features and many requests for the source code. Due to other top secret commitments, I have recently not had as much time as I would have liked to continue the development of DotNetKicks.com. A discussion on DotNetKicks last week re-highlighted the issue of feature stagnation (the community is continuing to grow just fine).

We are in the business of solving problems, and the best solution here is to open source the project. I had planned to release some code this past weekend, but some of the current dependencies include code that I don't wish to release. I am currently refactoring the dependencies, and I will be able to release some code very soon.

Please shout it from the roof tops, we need all the contributers we can get. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fgavinjoyce%2farchive%2f2007%2f03%2f20%2fdotnetkicks-to-be-open-source.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fgavinjoyce%2farchive%2f2007%2f03%2f20%2fdotnetkicks-to-be-open-source.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/DotNetKicks_to_be_Open_Sourced</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/DotNetKicks_to_be_Open_Sourced</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:16:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Who Tests The Tests?</title>
      <description>If, according to TDD, you should write unit tests before you write the tests. Shouldn't you write tests for the tests, since the unit tests themselves are code? This post explains how to avoid Zeno's paradox here. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f03%2f12%2fwho-tests-the-tests.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2007%2f03%2f12%2fwho-tests-the-tests.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Who_Tests_The_Tests</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Who_Tests_The_Tests</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:01:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>