<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com : Stories kicked by brianjlowry</title>
    <description>Stories kicked by brianjlowry</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Automatically minify and combine JavaScript in Visual Studio</title>
      <description>As you begin developing more complex client-side functionality, managing the size and shape of your JavaScript includes becomes a key concern. It's all too easy to accidentally end up with hundreds of kilobytes of JavaScript spread across many separate HTTP requests, significantly slowing down your initial page loads.

I hope you'll find that this technique is a good compromise between the tedium of using manual minification tools and the overwrought complexity of setting up some of the more "enterprisey" automation solutions. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fencosia.com%2f2009%2f05%2f20%2fautomatically-minify-and-combine-javascript-in-visual-studio%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fencosia.com%2f2009%2f05%2f20%2fautomatically-minify-and-combine-javascript-in-visual-studio%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Automatically_minify_and_combine_JavaScript_in_Visual_Studio</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Automatically_minify_and_combine_JavaScript_in_Visual_Studio</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 05:06:38 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kona 3: Learning Behavior Driven Development (BDD)</title>
      <description>Holy cow! Another *DD - man I really must have an IV with that Alt.NET Punch just coursing like a train in my veins! I ask for your patience with this one - cause I think BDD is a really good tool to know - whether you use it or not - knowing the workings of it will allow you to have some intelligent conversation the next time you're in Austin :). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.wekeroad.com%2fmvc-storefront%2fkona-3%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.wekeroad.com%2fmvc-storefront%2fkona-3%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Kona_3_Learning_Behavior_Driven_Development_BDD</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Kona_3_Learning_Behavior_Driven_Development_BDD</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 22:46:26 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC Subdomain Routing</title>
      <description>One of the propagated "great features" for ASP.NET MVC is the full control you have over the routing and url's of your webapplication. In order to demonstrate this, let's walk through a sample that specifically handles subdomain routing.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.securancy.com%2fpost%2fASPNET-MVC-Subdomain-Routing.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.securancy.com%2fpost%2fASPNET-MVC-Subdomain-Routing.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_Subdomain_Routing</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_Subdomain_Routing</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 02:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Rapid is Rapid? How Quick is Quick?</title>
      <description>An unusual take on the importance of raw performance in logging systems.  Sometimes less is more.  Rather, in logging, as in most software design challenges, keeping the big picture in mind is the most important thing.  Concepts extend to other design topics. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2frocksolid.gibraltarsoftware.com%2fdevelopment%2flogging%2fhow-rapid-is-rapid-how-quick-is-quick"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2frocksolid.gibraltarsoftware.com%2fdevelopment%2flogging%2fhow-rapid-is-rapid-how-quick-is-quick" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/How_Rapid_is_Rapid_How_Quick_is_Quick</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/How_Rapid_is_Rapid_How_Quick_is_Quick</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 02:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Code Generation Should be the Nuclear Option</title>
      <description>So let me first just start off by saying: I do not like code generation. In certain cases I think it can help greatly, but many people are far too eager to jump to this solution. I don't think that there is anything particularly evil about the process of generating code, but I do feel like using code generation as a day to day tool is a very bad practice. Code generation should be the tool of last resort when there is no good way to cleanly implement a solution which doesn't require code to be spread out everywhere. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f05%2f05%2fCode-Generation-Should-be-the-Nuclear-Option.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f05%2f05%2fCode-Generation-Should-be-the-Nuclear-Option.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Code_Generation_Should_be_the_Nuclear_Option</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Code_Generation_Should_be_the_Nuclear_Option</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 09:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Practical .NET Unit Testing - Free paper released</title>
      <description>A free unit testing paper that covers why you should write unit tests, the mechanics of unit testing, common testing strategies, designing for testability, and advanced testing techniques. It's an ongoing project, but it's complete enough to hopefully start getting early feedback and suggestions! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ytechie.com%2f2009%2f04%2fpractical-net-unit-testing-free-paper-released.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ytechie.com%2f2009%2f04%2fpractical-net-unit-testing-free-paper-released.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Practical_NET_Unit_Testing_Free_paper_released</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Practical_NET_Unit_Testing_Free_paper_released</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 07:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Creating Visual Studio Templates from your Web Projects</title>
      <description>Visual Studio has the nice capability to create project templates from existing projects and with a little bit of work it's real easy to create a project environment that's ready to roll without having to dig for related components first. This applies to Web projects more than anything for me as I have a fair bit of generic utility code that is project specific and needs to be added to just about all projects. Templates make this real quick and easy. Here's how. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.west-wind.com%2fweblog%2fposts%2f740022.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.west-wind.com%2fweblog%2fposts%2f740022.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Creating_Visual_Studio_Templates_from_your_Web_Projects</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Creating_Visual_Studio_Templates_from_your_Web_Projects</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:16:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.Net - Never again fear publishing your website with debug=true</title>
      <description>What makes the deployment element special is that it is a machine level configuration element. When its retail attribute is set to true, it will disable the &amp;lt;compilation debug="true"&amp;gt; for ALL ASP.Net applications running on that machine. In addition, it turns of detailed errors messages being sent to remote machines and disables the ability to trace output. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.aggregatedintelligence.com%2f2009%2f04%2faspnet-never-again-fear-publishing-your.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.aggregatedintelligence.com%2f2009%2f04%2faspnet-never-again-fear-publishing-your.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_Net_Never_again_fear_publishing_your_website_with_debug_true</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_Net_Never_again_fear_publishing_your_website_with_debug_true</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I Spose I'll Just Say It: You Should Learn MVC</title>
      <description>I'm never shy about my opinion - why start now? I've been reading a lot of posts flying about on whether you should learn MVC, Summing up the differences so you can decide when to use it, I even found a post that offers a scorecard approach! I remember reading the latter post thinking to myself "how can you possibly put a number next to Testability? And why it is only 2 more points than "using a RAD designer"? Isn't this missing the entire point? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.wekeroad.com%2fblog%2fi-spose-ill-just-say-it-you-should-learn-mvc%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.wekeroad.com%2fblog%2fi-spose-ill-just-say-it-you-should-learn-mvc%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/I_Spose_I_ll_Just_Say_It_You_Should_Learn_MVC</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/I_Spose_I_ll_Just_Say_It_You_Should_Learn_MVC</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:31:21 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to improve the performances of ASP.NET MVC web applications</title>
      <description>Today I stumbled upon a nice presentation that Rudi Benkovic gave last week at the Slovenian DotNet User Group, about ASP.NET MVC Performances.
It is an in depth analysis of a Digg-like site and how it went from serving (on a test machine) 6 req/sec to 390 req/sec.
The analysis prove the usual rule of performance optimization: no matter what you do to optimize your code, the biggest performance hit is data retrieval, and the first thing you have to optimize is always this.
But apart from this obvious outcome, I just want to take out from this presentation the 3 point that are really specific to ASP.NET MVC &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodeclimber.net.nz%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f17%2fhow-to-improve-the-performances-of-asp.net-mvc-web-applications.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodeclimber.net.nz%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f17%2fhow-to-improve-the-performances-of-asp.net-mvc-web-applications.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/How_to_improve_the_performances_of_ASP_NET_MVC_web_applications</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/How_to_improve_the_performances_of_ASP_NET_MVC_web_applications</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do We Create Type Systems In Dynamic Languages?</title>
      <description>Justin Etheredge examines whether home-grown type systems appear in large projects written with dynamic languages. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f04%2f05%2fDo-We-Create-Type-Systems-In-Dynamic-Languages.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f04%2f05%2fDo-We-Create-Type-Systems-In-Dynamic-Languages.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Do_We_Create_Type_Systems_In_Dynamic_Languages</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Do_We_Create_Type_Systems_In_Dynamic_Languages</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:17:57 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 reasons why you should use ASP.NET MVC</title>
      <description>I'll be fair with you readers. I've only toyed with the ASP.NET MVC framework. It looks great as of now but it's the first full blown MVC framework that we have that is backed by Microsoft. However, there is a lot of opposition nowadays that tend to be formulated like this:

Why should I use ASP.NET MVC? WebForms works well.

Other problems come from the lack of server controls. When a developer look at that and he then wonder why he should have to write HTML and Javascript when before he could have retrieved all that beautiful information with a simple postback. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.decayingcode.com%2f2009%2f04%2f5-reasons-why-you-should-use-aspnet-mvc.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.decayingcode.com%2f2009%2f04%2f5-reasons-why-you-should-use-aspnet-mvc.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/5_reasons_why_you_should_use_ASP_NET_MVC</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/5_reasons_why_you_should_use_ASP_NET_MVC</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:01:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>File Uploads in ASP.NET MVC 1.0 RTM</title>
      <description>I had not messed around with file uploads in ASP.NET MVC for a while and so when I fired up ASP.NET MVC 1.0 RTM I was pleasantly surprised to find out how easy they had made it! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f04%2f02%2fFile-Uploads-in-ASPNET-MVC-10-RTM.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f04%2f02%2fFile-Uploads-in-ASPNET-MVC-10-RTM.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/File_Uploads_in_ASP_NET_MVC_1_0_RTM</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/File_Uploads_in_ASP_NET_MVC_1_0_RTM</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 06:16:10 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ten C# Keywords That You Shouldn't Be Using</title>
      <description>Overview of some not-so-common keywords and reasons to avoid them...or understand what the implications are if we use them. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f04%2f02%2fTen-C-Keywords-That-You-Shouldne28099t-Be-Using.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f04%2f02%2fTen-C-Keywords-That-You-Shouldne28099t-Be-Using.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Ten_C_Keywords_That_You_Shouldn_t_Be_Using</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Ten_C_Keywords_That_You_Shouldn_t_Be_Using</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:31:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC source code under MS-PL</title>
      <description>Scott Guthrie announces that the ASP.NET MVC source code is being released under the Microsoft Public License (MS-PL).  MS-PL is an OSI-approved open source license.  The MS-PL contains no platform restrictions and provides broad rights to modify and redistribute the source code. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fscottgu%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f01%2fasp-net-mvc-1-0.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fscottgu%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f01%2fasp-net-mvc-1-0.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_source_code_under_MS_PL</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_source_code_under_MS_PL</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:16:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC Best Practices (Part 1) - Kazi Manzur Rashid's Blog</title>
      <description>In this post, I will share some of the best practices/guideline in developing ASP.NET MVC applications which I have learned in the hard way. I will not tell you to use DI or Unit Test instead I will assume you are already doing it and you prefer craftsmanship over anything. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2frashid%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f01%2fasp-net-mvc-best-practices-part-1.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2frashid%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f01%2fasp-net-mvc-best-practices-part-1.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_MVC_Best_Practices_Part_1_Kazi_Manzur_Rashid_s_Blog</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_MVC_Best_Practices_Part_1_Kazi_Manzur_Rashid_s_Blog</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Beginning Mocking With Moq 3 - Part 4</title>
      <description>into to mocking using moq libary, part 4 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f03%2f31%2fBeginning-Mocking-With-Moq-3-Part-4.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f03%2f31%2fBeginning-Mocking-With-Moq-3-Part-4.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/altnet/Beginning_Mocking_With_Moq_3_Part_4</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/altnet/Beginning_Mocking_With_Moq_3_Part_4</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 01:46:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Useful SQL Server Scripts</title>
      <description>Collection of 5 useful scripts for SQL Server. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.tboda.com%2fpost%2f5-Useful-SQL-Server-Scripts.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.tboda.com%2fpost%2f5-Useful-SQL-Server-Scripts.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/5_Useful_SQL_Server_Scripts</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/5_Useful_SQL_Server_Scripts</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:01:05 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MvcContrib v1.0 Released! Download now!</title>
      <description>After official release of ASP.NET MVC 1.0 RTM it's time to release the first version of MvcContrib too! It's ready; download it ;-) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fjeffreypalermo.com%2fblog%2fmvccontrib-v1.0-released-download-now%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fjeffreypalermo.com%2fblog%2fmvccontrib-v1.0-released-download-now%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/MvcContrib_v1_0_Released_Download_now</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/MvcContrib_v1_0_Released_Download_now</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SpicIE -- framework for developing managed BHOs</title>
      <description>SpicIE makes it easy to develop plugins for IE in managed code.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcode.msdn.microsoft.com%2fSpicIE%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcode.msdn.microsoft.com%2fSpicIE%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ie/SpicIE_framework_for_developing_managed_BHOs</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ie/SpicIE_framework_for_developing_managed_BHOs</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:55:36 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A guide to Silverlight 3 new features</title>
      <description>Tim Heuer provides an amazing look into Silverlight 3's new features.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftimheuer.com%2fblog%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f18%2fsilverlight-3-whats-new-a-guide.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2ftimheuer.com%2fblog%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f18%2fsilverlight-3-whats-new-a-guide.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/A_guide_to_Silverlight_3_new_features</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/A_guide_to_Silverlight_3_new_features</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:31:13 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC 1.0 has been released!</title>
      <description>To keep up with a good tradition (see here and here), I'm being one of the earliest bloggers having great news on ASP.NET MVC: we are at version 1.0! This means production ready, supported, stable, .! Grab the download at Microsoft.com.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.maartenballiauw.be%2fpost%2f2009%2f03%2f18%2fASPNET-MVC-10-has-been-released!.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.maartenballiauw.be%2fpost%2f2009%2f03%2f18%2fASPNET-MVC-10-has-been-released!.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_1_0_has_been_released</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_1_0_has_been_released</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC 1.0 released</title>
      <description>ASP.NET MVC 1.0 RTM is released &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.microsoft.com%2fdownloads%2fdetails.aspx%3fFamilyID%3d53289097-73ce-43bf-b6a6-35e00103cb4b%26displaylang%3den"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.microsoft.com%2fdownloads%2fdetails.aspx%3fFamilyID%3d53289097-73ce-43bf-b6a6-35e00103cb4b%26displaylang%3den" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_1_0_released</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_1_0_released</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:01:26 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How .NET Regular Expressions Really Work</title>
      <description>A very deep dive into the source code for how .NET Regular Expressions really work &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.moserware.com%2f2009%2f03%2fhow-net-regular-expressions-really-work.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.moserware.com%2f2009%2f03%2fhow-net-regular-expressions-really-work.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/regex/How_NET_Regular_Expressions_Really_Work</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/regex/How_NET_Regular_Expressions_Really_Work</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Beginning Mocking With Moq 3 - Part 3</title>
      <description>Beginners introduction to mocking using the recently released Moq 3 framework. This is part 3 of the series &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f03%2f13%2fBeginning-Mocking-With-Moq-3-Part-3.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f03%2f13%2fBeginning-Mocking-With-Moq-3-Part-3.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Beginning_Mocking_With_Moq_3_Part_3</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Beginning_Mocking_With_Moq_3_Part_3</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 02:31:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>