<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com : Stories kicked by craigtp</title>
    <description>Stories kicked by craigtp</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Compiling Conditional Code into ASP.NET Websites</title>
      <description>The following article demonstrates how to compile conditional code into your ASP.NET assembly. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetcurry.com%2fShowArticle.aspx%3fID%3d335"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetcurry.com%2fShowArticle.aspx%3fID%3d335" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Compiling_Conditional_Code_into_ASP_NET_Websites</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Compiling_Conditional_Code_into_ASP_NET_Websites</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft deprecating Oracle client in Dot Net 4</title>
      <description>Microsoft has announced through a blog that the ADO.NET 4 spec will mark the Oracle client as deprecated with plans for removal.  They are also recommending that users go to a third party Oracle provider.

Stop Helping the Competition?

Wow, this will mark the first time an ADO.NET provider has been removed from the .Net framework.  Is this a case of Microsoft trimming the fat, or pushing Oracle?  I always thought it a bit of a free ride that Microsoft was helping Oracle by building their provider for them...
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.vistadb.net%2fblog%2fpost%2f2009%2f06%2f16%2fMicrosoft-deprecating-Oracle-Client-from-ADONET-4.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.vistadb.net%2fblog%2fpost%2f2009%2f06%2f16%2fMicrosoft-deprecating-Oracle-Client-from-ADONET-4.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/Microsoft_deprecating_Oracle_client_in_Dot_Net_4</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/Microsoft_deprecating_Oracle_client_in_Dot_Net_4</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IIS Search Engine Optimization Toolkit (ScottGu)</title>
      <description>&amp;quot;Today we are shipping the first beta of a new free tool - the IIS Search Engine Optimization Toolkit - that makes it easy to perform SEO analysis on your site and identify and fix issues within it.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fscottgu%2farchive%2f2009%2f06%2f03%2fiis-search-engine-optimization-toolkit.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fscottgu%2farchive%2f2009%2f06%2f03%2fiis-search-engine-optimization-toolkit.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/IIS_Search_Engine_Optimization_Toolkit_ScottGu</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/IIS_Search_Engine_Optimization_Toolkit_ScottGu</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:45:05 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Visual Studio 2010: Multiple web.config versions</title>
      <description>Visual Studio 2010 has support for multiple web.config files. It is one feature of new web application packaging and deployment system. We can create now separate web.config files for each configuration we have for application. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fgunnarpeipman%2farchive%2f2009%2f06%2f03%2fvisual-studio-2010-multiple-web-config-versions.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fgunnarpeipman%2farchive%2f2009%2f06%2f03%2fvisual-studio-2010-multiple-web-config-versions.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Visual_Studio_2010_Multiple_web_config_versions</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Visual_Studio_2010_Multiple_web_config_versions</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 23:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scott Guthrie's links for May 30th</title>
      <description>More of Scott Guthrie's links:  May 30th Links: ASP.NET, AJAX, ASP.NET MVC, Visual Studio. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fscottgu%2farchive%2f2009%2f05%2f30%2fmay-30th-links-asp-net-ajax-asp-net-mvc-visual-studio.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fscottgu%2farchive%2f2009%2f05%2f30%2fmay-30th-links-asp-net-ajax-asp-net-mvc-visual-studio.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Scott_Guthrie_s_links_for_May_30th</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Scott_Guthrie_s_links_for_May_30th</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LINQ to SQL changes in .NET 4.0</title>
      <description>What's fixed and breaking changes for LINQ to SQL in .NET 4.0 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdamieng.com%2fblog%2f2009%2f06%2f01%2flinq-to-sql-changes-in-net-40"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdamieng.com%2fblog%2f2009%2f06%2f01%2flinq-to-sql-changes-in-net-40" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/linq/LINQ_to_SQL_changes_in_NET_4_0</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/linq/LINQ_to_SQL_changes_in_NET_4_0</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 12:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SubMain acquires GhostDoc</title>
      <description>An agreement between SubMain and Roland Weigelt, author of GhostDoc, will place future development of GhostDoc in the hands of SubMain. GhostDoc ( http://submain.com/ghostdoc ) is the popular XML Comments and documentation helper tool which SubMain will continue to maintain as a free product. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcommunity.submain.com%2fblogs%2fnews%2farchive%2f2009%2f06%2f01%2fSubMain-acquires-GhostDoc.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcommunity.submain.com%2fblogs%2fnews%2farchive%2f2009%2f06%2f01%2fSubMain-acquires-GhostDoc.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/SubMain_acquires_GhostDoc</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/SubMain_acquires_GhostDoc</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:45:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CodeSmith 5.1 Released with New Lower Pricing Options!</title>
      <description>CodeSmith is now offering personal licenses for individual developers at $199 (50% savings) when purchasing CodeSmith Professional.

Put time back in your day with CodeSmith 5.1.  Packed full of new Schema Providers, merge strategies, and updated CodeSmith project management, CodeSmith provides an even better code generation experience. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcommunity.codesmithtools.com%2fblogs%2fannouncements%2farchive%2f2009%2f05%2f06%2fcodesmith-5-1-now-available.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcommunity.codesmithtools.com%2fblogs%2fannouncements%2farchive%2f2009%2f05%2f06%2fcodesmith-5-1-now-available.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/CodeSmith_5_1_Released_with_New_Lower_Pricing_Options</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/CodeSmith_5_1_Released_with_New_Lower_Pricing_Options</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 11:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL Server 2008 Books You Must Have In Your Collection</title>
      <description>Here are some SQL Server 2008 books you 'must have' in your collection. I keep referencing most of these books now and then and find them quite useful. The books are categorized for Developers, Administrators and BI Developers/Administrators &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sqlservercurry.com%2f2009%2f05%2fsql-server-2008-books-you-must-have-in.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.sqlservercurry.com%2f2009%2f05%2fsql-server-2008-books-you-must-have-in.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_2008_Books_You_Must_Have_In_Your_Collection</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_2008_Books_You_Must_Have_In_Your_Collection</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:00:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Overview of .NET 4.0 features - ASP.NET 4.0 ClientIDMode</title>
      <description>In pre 4.0 days, when a server control is rendered, the framework would assign an ID to the control based on the control hierarchy. For example, a textbox of id &amp;quot;txtTest&amp;quot; in a user control that is used on a page would be rendered with the ID &amp;quot;WebUserControl11_txtTest&amp;quot;. Developers could use the ClientID property (ex: txtTest.ClientID) in the code behind to retrieve the ID assigned to the control by the framework. It was essential for the framework to assign the IDs this way to maintain uniqueness of the IDs on a page. In the prior example, the User Control that inherits from the System.Web.UI.UserControl implements the INamingContainer interface. Any control (either custom or a .NET control) that implements this interface would ensure unique naming scope for the child controls.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetcube.com%2fpost%2fOverview-of-NET-40-features-e28093-ASPNET-40-ClientIDMode.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetcube.com%2fpost%2fOverview-of-NET-40-features-e28093-ASPNET-40-ClientIDMode.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Overview_of_NET_4_0_features_ASP_NET_4_0_ClientIDMode</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Overview_of_NET_4_0_features_ASP_NET_4_0_ClientIDMode</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 19:45:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>25+ Best ASP.NET MVC Tutorials and Articles</title>
      <description>In this article we collected best tutorials and articles about ASP.NET MVC. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ajaxline.com%2f25-plus-best-asp-net-mvc-tutorials-and-articles"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ajaxline.com%2f25-plus-best-asp-net-mvc-tutorials-and-articles" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/25_Best_ASP_NET_MVC_Tutorials_and_Articles</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/25_Best_ASP_NET_MVC_Tutorials_and_Articles</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:32:36 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC - Poll Result, jQuery UI MVC Component Demo and More Fe...</title>
      <description>Few days back I ran a Poll to gather the feedback on ASP.NET MVC View Components that I am planning to build building. Though it is certainly not possible to get everyone's vote of the ASP.NET MVC Community, but I think the result has enough votes to represents the whole community: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2frashid%2farchive%2f2009%2f05%2f20%2fasp-net-mvc-poll-result-jquery-ui-mvc-component-demo-and-more-feedback-required.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2frashid%2farchive%2f2009%2f05%2f20%2fasp-net-mvc-poll-result-jquery-ui-mvc-component-demo-and-more-feedback-required.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_MVC_Poll_Result_jQuery_UI_MVC_Component_Demo_and_More_Fe</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_MVC_Poll_Result_jQuery_UI_MVC_Component_Demo_and_More_Fe</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 05:06:48 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC Domain Routing</title>
      <description>Ever since the release of ASP.NET MVC and its routing engine (System.Web.Routing), Microsoft has been trying to convince us that you have full control over your URL and routing. This is true to a certain extent: as long as it's related to your application path, everything works out nicely. If you need to take care of data tokens in your (sub)domain, you're screwed by default.
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.maartenballiauw.be%2fpost%2f2009%2f05%2f18%2fASPNET-MVC-Domain-Routing.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.maartenballiauw.be%2fpost%2f2009%2f05%2f18%2fASPNET-MVC-Domain-Routing.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_Domain_Routing</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_Domain_Routing</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 20:09:52 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Visual Studio 2010 Beta 1 for MSDN Subscribers</title>
      <description>Visual Studio 2010 Beta 1 is now on MSDN along with .Net 4 Beta 1.

Some highlights from the information:

.Net 4.0
Cloud Development - Windows Azure which is basically utility computing where you pay by the hour for your usage.
Parallel Development - Not sure if this only means PLINQ for .Net developers or if they are only talking about C++ devs.  
TDD Improvements - Editor changes for building test cases first, and then writing the code.
ASP.NET - CSS grids and design surfaces changes, more Javascript debugging improvements.
C++ Compiler - Lots of changes for C++ development, including MFC.
Sharepoint templates 
New Project Templates
Windows 7 - MFC updates for Ribbon UI, and WPF changes.
Application Model Changes - Reverse existing codebases, and lots of changes in Architect Edition to support more model types (including Class Libraries finally).
Test Runner - This is potentially huge as it allows testers to submit bug reports complete with callstacks and traces that you can actually use to resume an app at the error point to avoid the dreaded No Repro on bug reports.  I have seen this demo and it is quite impressive.  We will see how it actually works though. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.vistadb.net%2fblog%2fpost%2f2009%2f05%2f17%2fvisual-studio-2010-beta-1.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.vistadb.net%2fblog%2fpost%2f2009%2f05%2f17%2fvisual-studio-2010-beta-1.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Visual_Studio_2010_Beta_1_for_MSDN_Subscribers</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Visual_Studio_2010_Beta_1_for_MSDN_Subscribers</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 07:46:09 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BlogEngine.NET 1.5 final release</title>
      <description>BlogEngine.NET 1.5 final release announcement &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmadskristensen.net%2fpost%2fBlogEngineNET-15-final-release.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fmadskristensen.net%2fpost%2fBlogEngineNET-15-final-release.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/BlogEngine_NET_1_5_final_release</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/BlogEngine_NET_1_5_final_release</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:16:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 reasons why you should use ASP.NET MVC</title>
      <description>I'll be fair with you readers. I've only toyed with the ASP.NET MVC framework. It looks great as of now but it's the first full blown MVC framework that we have that is backed by Microsoft. However, there is a lot of opposition nowadays that tend to be formulated like this:

Why should I use ASP.NET MVC? WebForms works well.

Other problems come from the lack of server controls. When a developer look at that and he then wonder why he should have to write HTML and Javascript when before he could have retrieved all that beautiful information with a simple postback. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.decayingcode.com%2f2009%2f04%2f5-reasons-why-you-should-use-aspnet-mvc.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.decayingcode.com%2f2009%2f04%2f5-reasons-why-you-should-use-aspnet-mvc.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/5_reasons_why_you_should_use_ASP_NET_MVC</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/5_reasons_why_you_should_use_ASP_NET_MVC</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:01:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL Server scalability - losing the battle?</title>
      <description>This is a blog that I would like to share concerning the current status of the scalability of Microsoft SQL Server. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftexastoo.com%2fpost%2fSQL-Server-scalability-e28093-losing-the-battle.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2ftexastoo.com%2fpost%2fSQL-Server-scalability-e28093-losing-the-battle.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_scalability_losing_the_battle</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Server_scalability_losing_the_battle</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Visual Studio 2010 Architecture Edition</title>
      <description>Some screenshots and descriptions from the Visual Studio 2010 CTP, Architecture Edition, including Architecture Explorer, UML Support, and the Layer Diagram. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fajdotnet.wordpress.com%2f2009%2f03%2f29%2fvisual-studio-2010-architecture-edition%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fajdotnet.wordpress.com%2f2009%2f03%2f29%2fvisual-studio-2010-architecture-edition%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Visual_Studio_2010_Architecture_Edition</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Visual_Studio_2010_Architecture_Edition</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Useful SQL Server Scripts</title>
      <description>Collection of 5 useful scripts for SQL Server. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.tboda.com%2fpost%2f5-Useful-SQL-Server-Scripts.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.tboda.com%2fpost%2f5-Useful-SQL-Server-Scripts.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/5_Useful_SQL_Server_Scripts</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/5_Useful_SQL_Server_Scripts</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:01:05 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCOPE_IDENTITY Bug with Multi Processor Parallel Plan and Solution</title>
      <description>This article is very serious and I would like to explain this as simple as I can. SCOPE_IDNETITY() which is commonly used in place of @@Idnetity has bug when run in Parallel Plan.

Do your community service. Read the article. Bookmark it. Kick it and spread the word.

 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.sqlauthority.com%2f2009%2f03%2f24%2fsql-server-2008-scope_identity-bug-with-multi-processor-parallel-plan-and-solution%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.sqlauthority.com%2f2009%2f03%2f24%2fsql-server-2008-scope_identity-bug-with-multi-processor-parallel-plan-and-solution%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SCOPE_IDENTITY_Bug_with_Multi_Processor_Parallel_Plan_and_Solution</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SCOPE_IDENTITY_Bug_with_Multi_Processor_Parallel_Plan_and_Solution</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Installation and Configuration of Microsoft Velocity</title>
      <description>David walks us through how to install and configure Microsoft Velocity. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2faspnetpodcast.com%2fCS11%2fblogs%2fasp.net_podcast%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f18%2fasp-net-podcast-show-137-install-and-configuration-of-microsoft-velocity.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2faspnetpodcast.com%2fCS11%2fblogs%2fasp.net_podcast%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f18%2fasp-net-podcast-show-137-install-and-configuration-of-microsoft-velocity.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Installation_and_Configuration_of_Microsoft_Velocity</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Installation_and_Configuration_of_Microsoft_Velocity</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:01:18 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The State of ALT.NET</title>
      <description>Over the past 6 months I have been trying to really quantify what it means to be using ALT.NET practices. And I can honestly say that I still honestly don't know what it means to be an ALT.NETer. But I have come to a number of conclusions about the state of the ALT.NET community, that I wanted to share.
(1) The ALT.NET Community is fractured among itself.
(2) Take the religious zealotry out of ALT.NET
(3) Craftsmanship with out Engineering is no way to program software. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.coderjournal.com%2f2009%2f03%2fthe-state-of-altnet%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.coderjournal.com%2f2009%2f03%2fthe-state-of-altnet%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/altnet/The_State_of_ALT_NET</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/altnet/The_State_of_ALT_NET</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 03:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC 1.0 has been released!</title>
      <description>To keep up with a good tradition (see here and here), I'm being one of the earliest bloggers having great news on ASP.NET MVC: we are at version 1.0! This means production ready, supported, stable, .! Grab the download at Microsoft.com.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.maartenballiauw.be%2fpost%2f2009%2f03%2f18%2fASPNET-MVC-10-has-been-released!.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.maartenballiauw.be%2fpost%2f2009%2f03%2f18%2fASPNET-MVC-10-has-been-released!.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_1_0_has_been_released</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_1_0_has_been_released</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC goes RTM before MIX09</title>
      <description>Not sure if the release was intentional or just someone that forgot to set the timezone field while publishing the download, but ASP.NET MVC has been RTMed before MIX09. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodeclimber.net.nz%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f18%2fasp.net-mvc-goes-rtm-before-mix09.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodeclimber.net.nz%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f18%2fasp.net-mvc-goes-rtm-before-mix09.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_goes_RTM_before_MIX09</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_goes_RTM_before_MIX09</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC 1.0 released</title>
      <description>ASP.NET MVC 1.0 RTM is released &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.microsoft.com%2fdownloads%2fdetails.aspx%3fFamilyID%3d53289097-73ce-43bf-b6a6-35e00103cb4b%26displaylang%3den"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.microsoft.com%2fdownloads%2fdetails.aspx%3fFamilyID%3d53289097-73ce-43bf-b6a6-35e00103cb4b%26displaylang%3den" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_1_0_released</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_1_0_released</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:01:26 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>