<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com : Stories kicked by dburton</title>
    <description>Stories kicked by dburton</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>[Fixed] Adding DotNetKicks FeedFlare to FeedBurner</title>
      <description>FeedBurner used to allow adding DotNetKicks FeedFlare to your feeds. Even today, the FeedFlare catalog lists &amp;quot;Kick It&amp;quot; using DNK's FeedFlareUnit file. Unfortunately, when adding this file to FeedFlare using the link given in the catalog, the unfortunate user receives only a JavaScript alert of &amp;quot;We could not find a valid FeedFlare file at that location&amp;quot; instead of an enhanced feed. Find out why, and find a fix for it. Get DotNetKicks on your FeedBurner FeedFlare. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.cptloadtest.com%2f2009%2f04%2f02%2fFixedAddingDotNetKicksFeedFlareToFeedBurner.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.cptloadtest.com%2f2009%2f04%2f02%2fFixedAddingDotNetKicksFeedFlareToFeedBurner.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Fixed_Adding_DotNetKicks_FeedFlare_to_FeedBurner</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Fixed_Adding_DotNetKicks_FeedFlare_to_FeedBurner</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:10:55 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Patterns in Testing [2] - Stub Pattern</title>
      <description>Dennis Burton has a series on patterns of test doubles, such as Dummy, Stub, Spy, and Mock test patterns. This post covers the Stub pattern, when it applies, and how it will improve your coding practices. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevelopusing.net%2f2008%2f12%2f10%2fPatternsInTesting2StubPattern.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevelopusing.net%2f2008%2f12%2f10%2fPatternsInTesting2StubPattern.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Patterns_in_Testing_2_Stub_Pattern</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Patterns_in_Testing_2_Stub_Pattern</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:16:47 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Improving the SEO of your blog</title>
      <description>Did you know that yourdomain.com and www.yourdomain.com are actually different sites? Are they both serving the same content? If so, it may be negatively impacting your search engine rankings. Using HTTP 301 redirects, you can combine these synonymous URLs to increase your page ranking. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.cptloadtest.com%2f2008%2f12%2f04%2fURLRewritePart3ImprovingSEOAndTheWwwSubdomain.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.cptloadtest.com%2f2008%2f12%2f04%2fURLRewritePart3ImprovingSEOAndTheWwwSubdomain.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/tipsandtricks/Improving_the_SEO_of_your_blog</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/tipsandtricks/Improving_the_SEO_of_your_blog</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Testing WCF Apps (Part 2 of 4) -- Mocking out the service</title>
      <description>Once you have written tests against your WCF service, you need a strategy for testing the code that uses the service.  This article covers a technique for mocking out the WCF service. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fhouseofbilz.com%2farchive%2f2008%2f11%2f29%2ftesting-wcf-service-apps-part-2-of-4.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fhouseofbilz.com%2farchive%2f2008%2f11%2f29%2ftesting-wcf-service-apps-part-2-of-4.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Testing_WCF_Apps_Part_2_of_4_Mocking_out_the_service</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Testing_WCF_Apps_Part_2_of_4_Mocking_out_the_service</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 09:17:58 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Testing WCF Service Apps (1 of 4)</title>
      <description>One of the most beautiful things about the WCF framework is the way it was designed to be more testable than ASPX services.  When you design your WCF interface, you are mostly just designing an interface with the WCF ServiceContract attributes.  The WCF framework uses your interface to determine the actual contract and transport mechanism so you don't have to.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fgeekswithblogs.net%2fHouseOfBilz%2farchive%2f2008%2f11%2f24%2ftesting-wcf-service-apps-part-1-of-4.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fgeekswithblogs.net%2fHouseOfBilz%2farchive%2f2008%2f11%2f24%2ftesting-wcf-service-apps-part-1-of-4.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Testing_WCF_Service_Apps_1_of_4</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Testing_WCF_Service_Apps_1_of_4</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:43:11 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>