<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com : Stories kicked by dengar007</title>
    <description>Stories kicked by dengar007</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Java versus .Net programmers</title>
      <description>I think that there is the right tool for each problem and I always worry about the syndrome of "if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail". There are such a great amount of different techniques in programming science, that we cannot reduce everything to the classic "DI IOC AOP ORM". &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.nablasoft.com%2falkampfer%2findex.php%2f2009%2f04%2f28%2fjava-versus-net-programmers%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.nablasoft.com%2falkampfer%2findex.php%2f2009%2f04%2f28%2fjava-versus-net-programmers%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Java_versus_Net_programmers</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Java_versus_Net_programmers</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 09:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to improve HtmlHelper.RenderPartial perf: don't run in debug mode</title>
      <description>There has a been a lot of talking on a possible "big design flaw" in ASP.NET MVC: partial view path resolution was not cached.
After a bit of testing I found out that caching kicks in only in release mode. So probably all the other tests were run in debug mode. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodeclimber.net.nz%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f22%2fhow-to-improve-htmlhelper.renderpartial-performances-donrsquot-run-in-debug-mode.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodeclimber.net.nz%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f22%2fhow-to-improve-htmlhelper.renderpartial-performances-donrsquot-run-in-debug-mode.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/How_to_improve_HtmlHelper_RenderPartial_perf_don_t_run_in_debug_mode</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/How_to_improve_HtmlHelper_RenderPartial_perf_don_t_run_in_debug_mode</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:01:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to improve the performances of ASP.NET MVC web applications</title>
      <description>Today I stumbled upon a nice presentation that Rudi Benkovic gave last week at the Slovenian DotNet User Group, about ASP.NET MVC Performances.
It is an in depth analysis of a Digg-like site and how it went from serving (on a test machine) 6 req/sec to 390 req/sec.
The analysis prove the usual rule of performance optimization: no matter what you do to optimize your code, the biggest performance hit is data retrieval, and the first thing you have to optimize is always this.
But apart from this obvious outcome, I just want to take out from this presentation the 3 point that are really specific to ASP.NET MVC &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodeclimber.net.nz%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f17%2fhow-to-improve-the-performances-of-asp.net-mvc-web-applications.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodeclimber.net.nz%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f17%2fhow-to-improve-the-performances-of-asp.net-mvc-web-applications.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/How_to_improve_the_performances_of_ASP_NET_MVC_web_applications</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/How_to_improve_the_performances_of_ASP_NET_MVC_web_applications</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BlogEngine.NET 1.5 final release</title>
      <description>BlogEngine.NET 1.5 final release announcement &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmadskristensen.net%2fpost%2fBlogEngineNET-15-final-release.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fmadskristensen.net%2fpost%2fBlogEngineNET-15-final-release.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/BlogEngine_NET_1_5_final_release</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/BlogEngine_NET_1_5_final_release</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:16:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 Blogs ASP.NET MVC Developers Should Be Following</title>
      <description>Everyone knows that Phil Haack, Rob Conery, Scott Hanselman, and Scott Guthrie all provide good ASP.NET MVC content on their blogs. I wanted to provide a list of excellent resources on ASP.NET MVC that are a little less well known. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f04%2f13%2f5-Blogs-ASPNET-MVC-Developers-Should-Be-Following.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f04%2f13%2f5-Blogs-ASPNET-MVC-Developers-Should-Be-Following.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/5_Blogs_ASP_NET_MVC_Developers_Should_Be_Following</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/5_Blogs_ASP_NET_MVC_Developers_Should_Be_Following</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:46:07 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>13 ASP.NET MVC extensibility points you have to know</title>
      <description>One of the main design principles ASP.NET MVC has been designed with is extensibility. Everything (or most of) in the processing pipeline is replaceable so, if you don't like the conventions (or lack of them) that ASP.NET MVC uses, you can create your own services to support your conventions and inject them into the main pipeline.

This post shows 13 extensibility points that every ASP.NET MVC developer should know, starting from the beginning of the pipeline and going forward till the rendering of the view. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodeclimber.net.nz%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f08%2f13-asp.net-mvc-extensibility-points-you-have-to-know.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodeclimber.net.nz%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f08%2f13-asp.net-mvc-extensibility-points-you-have-to-know.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/13_ASP_NET_MVC_extensibility_points_you_have_to_know</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/13_ASP_NET_MVC_extensibility_points_you_have_to_know</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:46:06 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>9 Golden Rules of Visual Design</title>
      <description>A consistency in Visual Design signals to users that they are in the right place and that they are moving in the right direction. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftutorialfeed.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f04%2f9-golden-rules-of-visual-design.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2ftutorialfeed.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f04%2f9-golden-rules-of-visual-design.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/tipsandtricks/9_Golden_Rules_of_Visual_Design</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/tipsandtricks/9_Golden_Rules_of_Visual_Design</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:46:19 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>File Uploads in ASP.NET MVC 1.0 RTM</title>
      <description>I had not messed around with file uploads in ASP.NET MVC for a while and so when I fired up ASP.NET MVC 1.0 RTM I was pleasantly surprised to find out how easy they had made it! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f04%2f02%2fFile-Uploads-in-ASPNET-MVC-10-RTM.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f04%2f02%2fFile-Uploads-in-ASPNET-MVC-10-RTM.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/File_Uploads_in_ASP_NET_MVC_1_0_RTM</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/File_Uploads_in_ASP_NET_MVC_1_0_RTM</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 06:16:10 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC Best Practices (Part 2) - Kazi Manzur Rashid's Blog</title>
      <description>This is the second part of the series and may be the last, till I find some thing new. My plan was to start with routing, controller, controller to model, controller to view and last of all the view, but some how I missed one important thing in routing, so I will begin with that in this post. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2frashid%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f03%2fasp-net-mvc-best-practices-part-2.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2frashid%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f03%2fasp-net-mvc-best-practices-part-2.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_MVC_Best_Practices_Part_2_Kazi_Manzur_Rashid_s_Blog</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_MVC_Best_Practices_Part_2_Kazi_Manzur_Rashid_s_Blog</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ten C# Keywords That You Shouldn't Be Using</title>
      <description>Overview of some not-so-common keywords and reasons to avoid them...or understand what the implications are if we use them. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f04%2f02%2fTen-C-Keywords-That-You-Shouldne28099t-Be-Using.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f04%2f02%2fTen-C-Keywords-That-You-Shouldne28099t-Be-Using.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Ten_C_Keywords_That_You_Shouldn_t_Be_Using</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Ten_C_Keywords_That_You_Shouldn_t_Be_Using</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:31:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Back to the future! Exploring ASP.NET MVC Futures</title>
      <description>For those of you who did not know yet: next to the ASP.NET MVC 1.0 version and its source code, there's also an interesting assembly available if you can not wait for next versions of the ASP.NET MVC framework: the MVC Futures assembly. In this blog post, I'll provide you with a quick overview of what is available in this assembly and how you can already benefit from. "the future".  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.maartenballiauw.be%2fpost%2f2009%2f04%2f02%2fBack-to-the-future!-Exploring-ASPNET-MVC-Futures.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.maartenballiauw.be%2fpost%2f2009%2f04%2f02%2fBack-to-the-future!-Exploring-ASPNET-MVC-Futures.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/Back_to_the_future_Exploring_ASP_NET_MVC_Futures</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/Back_to_the_future_Exploring_ASP_NET_MVC_Futures</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:01:19 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CodeRush &amp;amp; Refactor! Pro 9.1 is released</title>
      <description>Performance should be noticeably faster in most areas of the product, especially on large projects. Startup time, project opening time and editing performance have all been affected by this work.

Memory usage has been reduced significantly, and should be especially noticeable when working with large projects.

Code issue technology is now shipping. This new technology shows redundant code, hints, warnings, errors, and design-related problems (a.k.a. &amp;quot;code smells&amp;quot;) while you work, and also binds to CodeRush's CodeProvider technology and Refactor! Pro's refactoring technology, so you can quickly apply fixes to a number of detected issues. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcommunity.devexpress.com%2fblogs%2fmarkmiller%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f01%2fwhat-s-new-in-coderush-amp-refactor-pro-9-1.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcommunity.devexpress.com%2fblogs%2fmarkmiller%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f01%2fwhat-s-new-in-coderush-amp-refactor-pro-9-1.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/products/CodeRush_Refactor_Pro_9_1_is_released</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/products/CodeRush_Refactor_Pro_9_1_is_released</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:31:16 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC source code under MS-PL</title>
      <description>Scott Guthrie announces that the ASP.NET MVC source code is being released under the Microsoft Public License (MS-PL).  MS-PL is an OSI-approved open source license.  The MS-PL contains no platform restrictions and provides broad rights to modify and redistribute the source code. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fscottgu%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f01%2fasp-net-mvc-1-0.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fscottgu%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f01%2fasp-net-mvc-1-0.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_source_code_under_MS_PL</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_source_code_under_MS_PL</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:16:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC Best Practices (Part 1) - Kazi Manzur Rashid's Blog</title>
      <description>In this post, I will share some of the best practices/guideline in developing ASP.NET MVC applications which I have learned in the hard way. I will not tell you to use DI or Unit Test instead I will assume you are already doing it and you prefer craftsmanship over anything. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2frashid%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f01%2fasp-net-mvc-best-practices-part-1.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2frashid%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f01%2fasp-net-mvc-best-practices-part-1.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_MVC_Best_Practices_Part_1_Kazi_Manzur_Rashid_s_Blog</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_MVC_Best_Practices_Part_1_Kazi_Manzur_Rashid_s_Blog</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Putting the "M" Back in MVC</title>
      <description>&amp;quot;Trying to keep up my end of the bargain with respect to MVC and SubSonic :). I did a walkthrough of it and decided that I was talking too much and, in honor of everyone telling me "SubSonic is dead" I thought it fitting to toss in some Rob Zombie.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.wekeroad.com%2fblog%2fputting-the-ldquo-m-rdquo-back-in-mvc%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.wekeroad.com%2fblog%2fputting-the-ldquo-m-rdquo-back-in-mvc%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/Putting_the_M_Back_in_MVC</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/Putting_the_M_Back_in_MVC</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 04:46:14 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Heisenberg And Lambdas</title>
      <description>How can we tell if an object is going to leak? We can't hold a reference to it, since that will cause it to stick around. So how can we get a reference which isn't a reference? Well, we get a weak reference! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f03%2f30%2fHeisenberg-And-Lambdas.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f03%2f30%2fHeisenberg-And-Lambdas.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Heisenberg_And_Lambdas</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Heisenberg_And_Lambdas</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MvcContrib v1.0 Released! Download now!</title>
      <description>After official release of ASP.NET MVC 1.0 RTM it's time to release the first version of MvcContrib too! It's ready; download it ;-) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fjeffreypalermo.com%2fblog%2fmvccontrib-v1.0-released-download-now%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fjeffreypalermo.com%2fblog%2fmvccontrib-v1.0-released-download-now%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/MvcContrib_v1_0_Released_Download_now</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/MvcContrib_v1_0_Released_Download_now</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Creating SOLID Code: Dependency Inversion Principle</title>
      <description> Taking a look at how to create SOLID Code: Creating SOLID Code: Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP). This is a last episode in a series where we will take a look at each of the parts the SOLID Princi &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dimecasts.net%2fCasts%2fCastDetails%2f96"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dimecasts.net%2fCasts%2fCastDetails%2f96" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Creating_SOLID_Code_Dependency_Inversion_Principle</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Creating_SOLID_Code_Dependency_Inversion_Principle</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:01:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Integrating Silverlight and ASP.NET MVC</title>
      <description>I mean come on. Doesn't that title just suck you right in? Tim Heuer bridges the gap.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftimheuer.com%2fblog%2farchive%2f2009%2f02%2f09%2fsilverlight-as-a-view-in-aspnet-mvc.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2ftimheuer.com%2fblog%2farchive%2f2009%2f02%2f09%2fsilverlight-as-a-view-in-aspnet-mvc.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/Integrating_Silverlight_and_ASP_NET_MVC</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/Integrating_Silverlight_and_ASP_NET_MVC</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Are you a Control Freak?</title>
      <description>Since the very early ASP.NET MVC previews, the most common argument I've heard against using the framework is the lack of user controls. In my opinion, this is a mixed blessing, however, for some, this is a show stopper. What can you do to provide a rich user interface with the MVC framework, while not reinventing the wheel? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2ffrickinsweet.com%2fryanlanciaux.com%2fpost%2fAre-you-a-Control-Freak.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2ffrickinsweet.com%2fryanlanciaux.com%2fpost%2fAre-you-a-Control-Freak.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/Are_you_a_Control_Freak</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/Are_you_a_Control_Freak</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:31:12 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>$(document).ready() and pageLoad() are not the same!</title>
      <description>A few examples about how $(document).ready() and pageLoad() differ, practical examples of when both are useful, and a third alternative that is more suitable in some cases. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fencosia.com%2f2009%2f03%2f25%2fdocument-ready-and-pageload-are-not-the-same%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fencosia.com%2f2009%2f03%2f25%2fdocument-ready-and-pageload-are-not-the-same%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ajax/document_ready_and_pageLoad_are_not_the_same</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ajax/document_ready_and_pageLoad_are_not_the_same</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC for RoR developers: do as locals do</title>
      <description>A few days ago, Simon Tokumine, a Ruby On Rails developer from UK who had to build a web app using ASP.NET MVC wrote a nice post that makes a comparison between RoR and ASP.NET MVC. 
In this post I'm going to give him and to other RoR developers that want (or are forced to) evaluate and eventually use ASP.NET MVC in a project the tips that they need to do as locals do &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodeclimber.net.nz%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f23%2fasp.net-mvc-for-ror-developers-do-as-locals-do.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodeclimber.net.nz%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f23%2fasp.net-mvc-for-ror-developers-do-as-locals-do.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_for_RoR_developers_do_as_locals_do</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_for_RoR_developers_do_as_locals_do</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:16:12 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do You *Really* Need a College Degree to Get a Programming Job?</title>
      <description>There's plenty of articles about the shortage of skilled IT workers and the difficulty experienced by companies in finding qualified software developers. The whining would be far more credible if the Want Ads didn't have a silly, arbitrary qualification: a college degree. 


 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.javaworld.com%2fcommunity%2fnode%2f2651"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.javaworld.com%2fcommunity%2fnode%2f2651" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Do_You_Really_Need_a_College_Degree_to_Get_a_Programming_Job</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Do_You_Really_Need_a_College_Degree_to_Get_a_Programming_Job</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 03:16:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Git/Github survival guide</title>
      <description>Now that all the cool guys are moving to Git/GitHub, Ivan posts a survival guide, with all the most useful commands of git and how to get started with github/git &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fflanders.co.nz%2f2009%2f03%2f21%2fgitgithub-survival-guide%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fflanders.co.nz%2f2009%2f03%2f21%2fgitgithub-survival-guide%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Git_Github_survival_guide</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Git_Github_survival_guide</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:16:10 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fluent NHibernate new style mappings - powerful semantics</title>
      <description>So today I updated to the latest build of Fluent NHibernate.  As any of you who might have done the same have discovered there are some breaking changes. I wasn't sure I liked the new class based conventions at first, especially since it wasn't clear at first how to tackle altering my mappings. Then it dawned on me how powerful the conventions would end up being while also promoting DRY. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fang3lfir3.wordpress.com%2f2009%2f03%2f18%2ffluent-nhibernate-new-style-mappings-powerful-semantics%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fang3lfir3.wordpress.com%2f2009%2f03%2f18%2ffluent-nhibernate-new-style-mappings-powerful-semantics%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/patterns/Fluent_NHibernate_new_style_mappings_powerful_semantics</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/patterns/Fluent_NHibernate_new_style_mappings_powerful_semantics</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:01:06 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>