<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com : Stories kicked by fquednau</title>
    <description>Stories kicked by fquednau</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Profiling the Memory Usage of a .NET Application </title>
      <description>Automatic memory management in .NET makes development a lot easier; however, it's still easy to introduce memory leaks into your application. For example, in a complex application, it's easy to forget to unregister event handlers, and these are notorious for holding on to objects which you don't need to keep in memory any more. This typically leads to an increase in memory usage which, if it remains unchecked and unresolved, can lead to your application exhibiting poor performance, or even running out of memory and crashing. This is where a memory profiler becomes necessary.

 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.simple-talk.com%2fdotnet%2f.net-tools%2fprofiling-the-memory-usage-of-a-.net-application-with-ants-memory-profiler-5%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.simple-talk.com%2fdotnet%2f.net-tools%2fprofiling-the-memory-usage-of-a-.net-application-with-ants-memory-profiler-5%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Profiling_the_Memory_Usage_of_a_NET_Application</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Profiling_the_Memory_Usage_of_a_NET_Application</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:45:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Performance testing of Dictionary, List and HashSet</title>
      <description>A quick little test of how the .net 3.5 Dictionary, List and HashSet compare adding and finding items. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fsoftscenario.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f05%2fperformance-testing-of-dictionary-list.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fsoftscenario.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f05%2fperformance-testing-of-dictionary-list.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Performance_testing_of_Dictionary_List_and_HashSet</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Performance_testing_of_Dictionary_List_and_HashSet</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 20:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to add Silverlight detection to Google Analytics</title>
      <description>One of the things that are currently missing from Google Analytics is Silverlight detection. Normally this type of information would appear under the browser capabilities section, the same section that lists Flash and Java versions. While I'm sure this will change eventually, it is something that can be very useful to web sites hosting Silverlight applications today. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.apijunkie.com%2fAPIJunkie%2fblog%2fpost%2f2009%2f05%2fHow-to-add-Silverlight-version-detection-to-Google-Analytics.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.apijunkie.com%2fAPIJunkie%2fblog%2fpost%2f2009%2f05%2fHow-to-add-Silverlight-version-detection-to-Google-Analytics.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/How_to_add_Silverlight_detection_to_Google_Analytics</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/How_to_add_Silverlight_detection_to_Google_Analytics</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 04:18:24 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kona 3: Learning Behavior Driven Development (BDD)</title>
      <description>Holy cow! Another *DD - man I really must have an IV with that Alt.NET Punch just coursing like a train in my veins! I ask for your patience with this one - cause I think BDD is a really good tool to know - whether you use it or not - knowing the workings of it will allow you to have some intelligent conversation the next time you're in Austin :). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.wekeroad.com%2fmvc-storefront%2fkona-3%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.wekeroad.com%2fmvc-storefront%2fkona-3%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Kona_3_Learning_Behavior_Driven_Development_BDD</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Kona_3_Learning_Behavior_Driven_Development_BDD</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 22:46:26 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Code Generation Should be the Nuclear Option</title>
      <description>So let me first just start off by saying: I do not like code generation. In certain cases I think it can help greatly, but many people are far too eager to jump to this solution. I don't think that there is anything particularly evil about the process of generating code, but I do feel like using code generation as a day to day tool is a very bad practice. Code generation should be the tool of last resort when there is no good way to cleanly implement a solution which doesn't require code to be spread out everywhere. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f05%2f05%2fCode-Generation-Should-be-the-Nuclear-Option.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f05%2f05%2fCode-Generation-Should-be-the-Nuclear-Option.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Code_Generation_Should_be_the_Nuclear_Option</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Code_Generation_Should_be_the_Nuclear_Option</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 09:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Using Obscure Windows COM APIs in .NET</title>
      <description>A lot of the new Windows Vista and Windows 7 APIs are exposed via COM. Here's a simple introduction for how to use them when no wrappers are available. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.moserware.com%2f2009%2f04%2fusing-obscure-windows-com-apis-in-net.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.moserware.com%2f2009%2f04%2fusing-obscure-windows-com-apis-in-net.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Using_Obscure_Windows_COM_APIs_in_NET</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Using_Obscure_Windows_COM_APIs_in_NET</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Just say No! to C# Regions</title>
      <description>You need a language construct so that your IDE can help you hide your big messy code block from you (because it's just so hideous, you don't even want to look at it anymore)? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fextractmethod.wordpress.com%2f2008%2f02%2f29%2fjust-say-no-to-c-regions%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fextractmethod.wordpress.com%2f2008%2f02%2f29%2fjust-say-no-to-c-regions%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Just_say_No_to_C_Regions</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Just_say_No_to_C_Regions</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC source code under MS-PL</title>
      <description>Scott Guthrie announces that the ASP.NET MVC source code is being released under the Microsoft Public License (MS-PL).  MS-PL is an OSI-approved open source license.  The MS-PL contains no platform restrictions and provides broad rights to modify and redistribute the source code. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fscottgu%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f01%2fasp-net-mvc-1-0.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fscottgu%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f01%2fasp-net-mvc-1-0.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_source_code_under_MS_PL</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_source_code_under_MS_PL</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:16:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dragging has NEVER been so easy</title>
      <description>A example of how to make elements in WPF drag-able using Expression Blend 3 behaviours! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdotnet.org.za%2frudi%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f23%2fdragging-has-never-been-so-easy.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdotnet.org.za%2frudi%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f23%2fdragging-has-never-been-so-easy.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/wpf/Dragging_has_NEVER_been_so_easy</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/wpf/Dragging_has_NEVER_been_so_easy</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:16:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How .NET Regular Expressions Really Work</title>
      <description>A very deep dive into the source code for how .NET Regular Expressions really work &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.moserware.com%2f2009%2f03%2fhow-net-regular-expressions-really-work.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.moserware.com%2f2009%2f03%2fhow-net-regular-expressions-really-work.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/regex/How_NET_Regular_Expressions_Really_Work</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/regex/How_NET_Regular_Expressions_Really_Work</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ninject 2 Reaches Beta</title>
      <description>Version 2.0 of the Ninject dependency injection framework has reached beta status. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fkohari.org%2f2009%2f02%2f25%2fninject-2-reaches-beta%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fkohari.org%2f2009%2f02%2f25%2fninject-2-reaches-beta%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Ninject_2_Reaches_Beta</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Ninject_2_Reaches_Beta</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:31:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Joining &amp;quot;IE6: Do NOT want!&amp;quot; campaign</title>
      <description>IE6 users are still too many... it started with a tweet from a Norwegian web developer, and spread like fire across Europe.
Joining the campaign is easy: just add a few lines of code to your site or blog.
In this post is how to do it and a little more of background on how to do it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodeclimber.net.nz%2farchive%2f2009%2f02%2f23%2fie6-do-not-want-campaign.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodeclimber.net.nz%2farchive%2f2009%2f02%2f23%2fie6-do-not-want-campaign.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ie/Joining_IE6_Do_NOT_want_campaign</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ie/Joining_IE6_Do_NOT_want_campaign</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:01:16 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Who Knew Domain Validation Was So Hard?</title>
      <description>Justin continues searching for the best place to put domain validation logic. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f02%2f23%2fWho-Knew-Domain-Validation-Was-So-Hard.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f02%2f23%2fWho-Knew-Domain-Validation-Was-So-Hard.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Who_Knew_Domain_Validation_Was_So_Hard</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Who_Knew_Domain_Validation_Was_So_Hard</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:01:05 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Azure - Performance, IoC, and Instances</title>
      <description>My experience so far working with Azure. Some performance testing, IoC container incompatibilities, and frustration with instances. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ytechie.com%2f2009%2f02%2fazure-performance-ioc-and-instances.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ytechie.com%2f2009%2f02%2fazure-performance-ioc-and-instances.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/azure/Azure_Performance_IoC_and_Instances</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/azure/Azure_Performance_IoC_and_Instances</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:01:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>amCharts for WPF - WPF charting solution</title>
      <description>amCharts has released the first version of the WPF edition of their famous charting control bundle. This brings the power and flexibility of amCharts to the WPF platform. And as original amCharts for WPF can be used free of charge even in commercial projects and products. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwpf.amcharts.com%2fnews%2fintroducing-amcharts-for-wpf"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwpf.amcharts.com%2fnews%2fintroducing-amcharts-for-wpf" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/wpf/amCharts_for_WPF_WPF_charting_solution</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/wpf/amCharts_for_WPF_WPF_charting_solution</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 01:01:26 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Transactional File System Operations with C#</title>
      <description>In this post Tuna  tries to explain his approach to transactional file system operations. This piece of code uses two of the Vista's new features namely Kernel Transaction Manager(KTM) and Transactional NTFS. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.tunatoksoz.com%2fpost%2fTransactional-File-System-Operations.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.tunatoksoz.com%2fpost%2fTransactional-File-System-Operations.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/vista/Transactional_File_System_Operations_with_C</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/vista/Transactional_File_System_Operations_with_C</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Activator.CreateInstance Performance</title>
      <description>A look at the different forms of Activator.CreateInstance and the performance implications of each. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f01%2f05%2fActivatorCreateInstance-Performance.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f01%2f05%2fActivatorCreateInstance-Performance.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Activator_CreateInstance_Performance</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Activator_CreateInstance_Performance</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:31:23 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Most Interesting .NET StackOverFlow Questions</title>
      <description>Today a short list of My Personal Most Interesting .NET Questions to me asked on StackOverFlow I founded.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.sb2.fr%2fpost%2f2009%2f01%2f02%2fMost-Interesting-NET-StackOverFlow-Questions.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.sb2.fr%2fpost%2f2009%2f01%2f02%2fMost-Interesting-NET-StackOverFlow-Questions.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/tipsandtricks/Most_Interesting_NET_StackOverFlow_Questions</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/tipsandtricks/Most_Interesting_NET_StackOverFlow_Questions</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 22:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Oxite - Oh Dear Lord Why?! </title>
      <description>Oxite is an open source application built on ASP.NET MVC and Karl Seguin raises some points related to the design/architecture/implementation. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fkarlseguin%2farchive%2f2008%2f12%2f15%2foxite-oh-dear-lord-why.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fkarlseguin%2farchive%2f2008%2f12%2f15%2foxite-oh-dear-lord-why.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/Oxite_Oh_Dear_Lord_Why</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/Oxite_Oh_Dear_Lord_Why</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:01:16 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Choosing Between WebForms and MVC</title>
      <description>Another take on what to consider when making a decision between Asp.Net WebForms or Asp.Net MVC. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.gadodia.net%2fchoosing-between-webforms-and-mvc%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.gadodia.net%2fchoosing-between-webforms-and-mvc%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Choosing_Between_WebForms_and_MVC</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Choosing_Between_WebForms_and_MVC</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Some Thoughts on Oxite</title>
      <description>Rob Conery's comments and thoughts on new open-source CMS project 'Oxite'. In this post he analyzed some critical issues in Oxite and suggested some solutions to optimize this ASP.NET MVC powered blog engine. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.wekeroad.com%2fblog%2fsome-thoughts-on-oxite%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.wekeroad.com%2fblog%2fsome-thoughts-on-oxite%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Some_Thoughts_on_Oxite</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Some_Thoughts_on_Oxite</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Perfect Storm Botnet </title>
      <description>Rob Conery talks about the power of a bot net and why developers should be aware of XSS attacks and other nasties should an app be allowing users to post into the system. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2frob.conery%2farchive%2f2008%2f12%2f13%2fthe-perfect-storm-botnet.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2frob.conery%2farchive%2f2008%2f12%2f13%2fthe-perfect-storm-botnet.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/security/The_Perfect_Storm_Botnet</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/security/The_Perfect_Storm_Botnet</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Performance creating objects using generic new contraint</title>
      <description>Looks at performance creating objects using generic new contraint &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2fzelmalki%2farchive%2f2008%2f12%2f13%2fcreating-objects-using-generic-new-constraint.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2fzelmalki%2farchive%2f2008%2f12%2f13%2fcreating-objects-using-generic-new-constraint.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/clr/Performance_creating_objects_using_generic_new_contraint</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/clr/Performance_creating_objects_using_generic_new_contraint</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 09:49:44 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is F# faster than C#</title>
      <description>I had a bet with a co-worker that C# would out perform F# for a simple counting exercise. This turned out to be quite a surprise for many reasons. In this blog post I will try to explain why. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.nearinfinity.com%2fblogs%2fpage%2fjferner%3fentry%3dis_f_faster_than_c"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.nearinfinity.com%2fblogs%2fpage%2fjferner%3fentry%3dis_f_faster_than_c" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Is_F_faster_than_C</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Is_F_faster_than_C</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:16:11 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IronPython 2.0 Has Been Released</title>
      <description>Microsoft has released IronPython 2.0 on CodePlex, the .NET implementation of the Python language. The most important improvement is running on top of the Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.infoq.com%2fnews%2f2008%2f12%2fIronPython-2"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.infoq.com%2fnews%2f2008%2f12%2fIronPython-2" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/IronPython_2_0_Has_Been_Released</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/IronPython_2_0_Has_Been_Released</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>