This is just copied from Jeffery Palermo's blog. Please don't kick this, kick the original:

http://dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Scott_Guthrie_announces_ASP_NET_MVC_framework_at_Alt_Net_Conf#comments

"v1.6b minimizes to the tray :-) "

Fantastic, I didn't notice that.

There is no edit function yet. Feel free to resubmit - I'll delete this one.

The stable release is v1.01. The latest alpha and beta releases are v1.6.

I've been running v1.6b which is in the first link.

If you plan on contributing to the Mono project, don't look at the source. If you are a in a large organisation with lots of money, don't look at the code. Otherwise fill yer boots.

We'll be replacing our DNK SQL scripts with SubSonic migrations once they hit the SVN trunk.

@james

I'm just about to leave here so I won't be able to get it done. I think it should be OK, it is loaded via javascript on Scott's blog so it won't slow his post down anyway.

If they link to Scott's post, I wonder will our little 'kick it' button hold up. Does it count as a slashdotting if it doesn't? ;)

Please kick the original post from Scott Guthrie instead --> http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/NET_Framework_3_5_Is_Open_Source

"What happens when developers begin coding around implementation details though?"

As yesthatmcgurk says, they can already do that with reflector. It is also their problem to deal with.

"Hell, when has it not been open source?"

We can now see the code as it was written. It also indicates (to me anyway) that someone in MS is pushing the open source model internally. I hope to see a fully open source .NET framework in the future sometime (.NET 5 perhaps?).

Published to the homepage in 13 minutes - a record.

Debugging is going to be fantastic, what a nice journey it will be navigating the depths of the .NET framework while debugging.

Not quite open source, more like shared source. A great move nonetheless.

We haven't decided if they should be on by default. There will definitely be a user profile preference.

Feel free to let us know your thoughts on the issue on google code:

http://code.google.com/p/dotnetkicks/issues/detail?id=102

The document is a .doc. How 1990s.