<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com : Stories kicked by grauenwolf</title>
    <description>Stories kicked by grauenwolf</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Do Language Specific Libraries Belong in .NET? </title>
      <description>Should we really have libraries in .NET that are language specific? Why do only VB programmers get a Copy Directory function? Why do J# programmers (all 3 of them) get ZIP and UNZIP for free? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.infoq.com%2fnews%2f2008%2f06%2fCopy-Directory"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.infoq.com%2fnews%2f2008%2f06%2fCopy-Directory" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/clr/Do_Language_Specific_Libraries_Belong_in_NET</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/clr/Do_Language_Specific_Libraries_Belong_in_NET</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:53:46 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anonymous Methods vs Threads</title>
      <description>What happens when you combine anonymous methods and threads - a things you need to be aware or you will encounter a strange behavior that will be hard to explain. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fvaultofthoughts.net%2fAnonymousMethodsVsThreads.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fvaultofthoughts.net%2fAnonymousMethodsVsThreads.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Anonymous_Methods_vs_Threads</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Anonymous_Methods_vs_Threads</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:46:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The wrong attitude of learning on the job</title>
      <description>When many years of experience does not mean a penny &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.buunguyen.net%2fblog%2fthe-wrong-attitude-of-learning-on-the-job.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.buunguyen.net%2fblog%2fthe-wrong-attitude-of-learning-on-the-job.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/The_wrong_attitude_of_learning_on_the_job</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/The_wrong_attitude_of_learning_on_the_job</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 08:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quick Tip: Use System.IO.Path.Combine instead of string concatenation</title>
      <description>System.IO.Path has a number of utility methods that are useful when you have to progamatically build a file path ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmattberseth.com%2fblog%2f2007%2f04%2fsystemiopath.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fmattberseth.com%2fblog%2f2007%2f04%2fsystemiopath.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Quick_Tip_Use_System_IO_Path_Combine_instead_of_string_concatenation</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Quick_Tip_Use_System_IO_Path_Combine_instead_of_string_concatenation</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 05:01:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fire and Motion: What OpenXML Means to IBM and Lotus Notes</title>
      <description>A theory on why IBM is trying so hard to kill OpenXML and the role Lotus Notes plays in the dispute. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.infoq.com%2fnews%2f2007%2f01%2fODF-Notes"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.infoq.com%2fnews%2f2007%2f01%2fODF-Notes" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Fire_and_Motion_What_OpenXML_Means_to_IBM_and_Lotus_Notes</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Fire_and_Motion_What_OpenXML_Means_to_IBM_and_Lotus_Notes</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:16:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>