<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com : Stories kicked by magz</title>
    <description>Stories kicked by magz</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Removing unused CSS Classes from your web application</title>
      <description>2 ways to clean up your Css by removing unused classes. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetsurfers.com%2fBlog%2f2008%2f10%2f02%2fRemovingUnusedCSSClassesFromYourWebApplication.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetsurfers.com%2fBlog%2f2008%2f10%2f02%2fRemovingUnusedCSSClassesFromYourWebApplication.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Removing_unused_CSS_Classes_from_your_web_application</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Removing_unused_CSS_Classes_from_your_web_application</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:31:14 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Development Tools I Use &amp;amp; Recommend</title>
      <description>Eventually I will get to some technical code Posts. But for now, I'm a bit delayed with some other things at work lately. I will be blogging about Code Generation, OOP, and other topics very soon though. In the meantime, I wanted to share a list of tools I regularly use now or have used in the past as a C# / ASP.NET Engineer listed below: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodezest.com%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f28%2fdevelopment-tools-i-use-amp-recommend.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodezest.com%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f28%2fdevelopment-tools-i-use-amp-recommend.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Development_Tools_I_Use_Recommend</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Development_Tools_I_Use_Recommend</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:16:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ListBox Extension Method for Get and Set Selected Values</title>
      <description>ASP.Net ListBox control allows two types of selection mode: single and multiple. Working in single selection mode is similar to working with DropDown list control. Use ListBox.SelectedValue to get the value that was selected by a user. In order to set a selection SelectedIndex property can be used or Selected property of a particular item should be set to true.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fListBox-Extension-Method-for-Get-and-Set-Selected-Values.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fListBox-Extension-Method-for-Get-and-Set-Selected-Values.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/ListBox_Extension_Method_for_Get_and_Set_Selected_Values</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/ListBox_Extension_Method_for_Get_and_Set_Selected_Values</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:28:28 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BlogEngine Flaws</title>
      <description>Recently I've been having problems as the site has gotten more popular I've had comments and even posts disappearing randomly, sometimes re-appearing you might have experienced this yourself either on my site or in your own so after divulging into the code to see what was happening found something I thought was shocking. When you add a comment, or Rating, Approving and Remove Comments this is what BlogEngine DbBlogProvider actually does... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fBlogEngine-Flaws.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fBlogEngine-Flaws.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/BlogEngine_Flaws</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/BlogEngine_Flaws</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:01:10 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Web developers. You suck.</title>
      <description>Well, JavaScript developers, specifically. In order to aid in development of my own websites, I enabled JavaScript debugging in Internet Explorer a few weeks back. To my horror, I have quickly experienced what seems to be complete disregard for serving syntactically correct JavaScript on the open internet. No, I'm not just talking about a few niche websites, run by amateur programmers. I am talking about industry-leading nerd-friendly powerhouse websites that should know better. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fWeb-developers-You-suck.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fWeb-developers-You-suck.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ajax/Web_developers_You_suck</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ajax/Web_developers_You_suck</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:46:05 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Get Checked Repeater Items Extension Method</title>
      <description>Imagine you have a list of some items and checkboxes next to each item providing the ability for a user to make multiple choices and submit a result in one go. Weather you are implementing a news groups subscription, user survey or online products catalogue - the code behind is the same: we bind some object list to a data control like Repeater, add a checkbox to every item, set checkbox value to item ID.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fGet-Checked-Repeater-Items-Extension-Method.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fGet-Checked-Repeater-Items-Extension-Method.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Get_Checked_Repeater_Items_Extension_Method</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Get_Checked_Repeater_Items_Extension_Method</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:46:12 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCOPE_IDENTITY() return the id from the database on insert</title>
      <description>As a .NET programmer most of my time is spent coding in C# and I try to avoid writing SQL where possible. Recently I had to write an insert stored procedure and needed to return the ID of the row I was inserting. While writing my usual bad SQL I came across a fascinating function I've never used before, SCOPE_IDENTITY(). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fSCOPE_IDENTITY()-return-the-id-from-the-database-on-insert.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fSCOPE_IDENTITY()-return-the-id-from-the-database-on-insert.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SCOPE_IDENTITY_return_the_id_from_the_database_on_insert</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SCOPE_IDENTITY_return_the_id_from_the_database_on_insert</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:16:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Visual Studio 2008 and .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 Beta</title>
      <description>public beta of upcoming .NET 3.5 SP1 and VS 2008 SP1 releases is published &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fscottgu%2farchive%2f2008%2f05%2f12%2fvisual-studio-2008-and-net-framework-3-5-service-pack-1-beta.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fscottgu%2farchive%2f2008%2f05%2f12%2fvisual-studio-2008-and-net-framework-3-5-service-pack-1-beta.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Visual_Studio_2008_and_NET_Framework_3_5_Service_Pack_1_Beta</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Visual_Studio_2008_and_NET_Framework_3_5_Service_Pack_1_Beta</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A C# Operator I would like to see.</title>
      <description>You could argue there are too many operators in C# as it is; however, I feel having an acute knowledge of the available operators is like knowing CTRL + B will bold the selected text in most word processing software. To put it simply, it hurts no-one, whilst providing shortcuts to advanced users... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fA-CSharp-Operator-I-would-like-to-see.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fA-CSharp-Operator-I-would-like-to-see.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/A_C_Operator_I_would_like_to_see</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/A_C_Operator_I_would_like_to_see</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:46:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Implementing Generic Caching</title>
      <description>I develop for a large, high-availability website, with hundreds of thousands of daily users. As such, we need to cache a lot of data in our web-server memory (which is cheap) to save numerous hits to our main database cluster (which is very expensive). I would imagine the desire to improve performance by saving on database hits is common across many web applications - and caching frequently used data is often seen as one of the best ways to solve this problem. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fImplementing-Generic-Caching.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fImplementing-Generic-Caching.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Implementing_Generic_Caching</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Implementing_Generic_Caching</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>