<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com : Stories kicked by nwnug</title>
    <description>Stories kicked by nwnug</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>String.Format() and StringBuilder</title>
      <description>This article looks at the potential performance issues of String.Format() when used with StringBuilder. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdiditwith.net%2fPermaLink%2cguid%2ce62b5427-f447-4f04-a139-17cd3bbb24ed.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdiditwith.net%2fPermaLink%2cguid%2ce62b5427-f447-4f04-a139-17cd3bbb24ed.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/tipsandtricks/String_Format_and_StringBuilder</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/tipsandtricks/String_Format_and_StringBuilder</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:01:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Neat Tricks With Extension Methods</title>
      <description>Exploring some of the cool things you can do with extension methods in C# 3.0. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdiditwith.net%2fPermaLink%2cguid%2c0beef993-3417-4ed5-9393-b8b470a42c02.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdiditwith.net%2fPermaLink%2cguid%2c0beef993-3417-4ed5-9393-b8b470a42c02.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Neat_Tricks_With_Extension_Methods</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Neat_Tricks_With_Extension_Methods</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 17:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Performance of foreach vs. List.ForEach</title>
      <description>Today I was iterating a List&amp;lt;int&amp;gt; using a foreach-loop and feeling a bit smug in knowing how much more performance-conscious I was being than if I'd tried doing the same thing with an ArrayList filled with ints. Thanks to the wonder of generics, the C# compiler neatly avoids numerous boxing operations by using a System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerator&amp;lt;int&amp;gt; instance instead of the older System.Collections.IEnumerator. Then I got to thinking: &amp;quot;is this really the fastest way?&amp;quot; Upon investigation, it turns that, no, it isn't the fastest way. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdiditwith.net%2fPermaLink%2cguid%2c506c0888-8c5f-40e5-9d39-a09e2ebf3a55.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdiditwith.net%2fPermaLink%2cguid%2c506c0888-8c5f-40e5-9d39-a09e2ebf3a55.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Performance_of_foreach_vs_List_ForEach</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Performance_of_foreach_vs_List_ForEach</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 16:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dustin Campbell: Giving Enums a Little Love</title>
      <description>Dustin Campbell (Developer Express' Senior &amp;quot;Whipping Boy&amp;quot;) discusses improvements that should be made in order to round out the Enumeration data type in .NET (to provide for both increased functionality and improved readability of code that uses enums). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdiditwith.net%2fCommentView%2cguid%2c5123de5e-3ab6-4d09-b98f-a9a05cef6aad.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdiditwith.net%2fCommentView%2cguid%2c5123de5e-3ab6-4d09-b98f-a9a05cef6aad.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Dustin_Campbell_Giving_Enums_a_Little_Love</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Dustin_Campbell_Giving_Enums_a_Little_Love</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XmlDataSource: XPath Workaround For Default Namespaces</title>
      <description>The ASP.NET 2.0 XmlDataSource does not provide a way to handle namespaces in the source XML.  If your source XML uses namespaces, then you need to use XSLT to remove the namespaces, otherwise you won't be able to create a valid XPath statement that will work with the XmlDataSource.  Or do you?  (hint: you can do everything in XPath without resorting to XSLT) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fjasonf-blog.blogspot.com%2f2006%2f08%2fxmldatasource-xpath-workaround-for.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fjasonf-blog.blogspot.com%2f2006%2f08%2fxmldatasource-xpath-workaround-for.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/XmlDataSource_XPath_Workaround_For_Default_Namespaces</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/XmlDataSource_XPath_Workaround_For_Default_Namespaces</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:01:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Scott Hanselman podcast #28 - Open Source Options</title>
      <description>&amp;quot;My twenty-eighth Podcast is up. This episode is about the Option Source Community. This is a pretty open ended talk, as there really isn't an easy solution...&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.hanselman.com%2fblog%2fHanselminutesPodcast28OpenSourceOptions.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.hanselman.com%2fblog%2fHanselminutesPodcast28OpenSourceOptions.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Scott_Hanselman_podcast_28_Open_Source_Options</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Scott_Hanselman_podcast_28_Open_Source_Options</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:01:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hacker Cracks, Clones RFID Passport</title>
      <description>It took 2 weeks and $250 to clone the chip which is to be used in US passports. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ecommercetimes.com%2fstory%2f52270.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ecommercetimes.com%2fstory%2f52270.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Hacker_Cracks_Clones_RFID_Passport</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Hacker_Cracks_Clones_RFID_Passport</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 03:41:38 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>