offwhite: but they are all commercial apps.
WLW is a general purpose client, not tied to Windows Life Space as iWeb is to .Mac.
Anyway this proves my point again: there are no decent free app in the Mac OS space =)

Ken,
thank you for the comment.
Since the Mac world is more commercial oriented than the Windows one I think I'll have to pay for some of the apps I'm going to use.
But, the thing that make me think is that WLW is the best blogging app ever written, and it's free... while both MarsEdit and Ecto cost money and are sub-optimal.
Thank you anyway
Simo

Anyway Offwhite, find me a decent free blogging application, or a decent free texteditor, or a decent free FTP client, that are comparable to WLW, NotePad++ and SmartFTP, and I'll amend the post

I'm not bashing anything or anyone: I'm just enumerating the differences and my "random" thought after using a Mac for one week.
On Windows there are lot of apps, mostly opensource or freeware, while on the Mac there are fewer apps available, and all of the them are commercial ones.
And I was not bashing Objective-C... I was only guessing one of the possible causes why there are almost no opensource apps for the Mac.
I DO know about the dynamic typing features of Objective-C, but, as I said in a comment on my blog, the world is going managed... Objective-C, untill Leopard, was manual alloc, dispose and so on..

No idea what the original survey meant with it. Probably can be safely added in the figures of "Raw Ajax"

I create a .net focused survey here: http://codeclimber.net.nz/archive/2007/12/18/Ajax-usage-among-.NET-developers.aspx

thanx for sharing... cool

Simone, I agree with you, but, isn't this the same as all the Subsonic related stories? the only difference is that this is a commercial software and not an opensource one.

Well.. so... someone... do it :)

Ah, now I see, "laem" was a misspell for "lame"...
yes it was about last year, and the year before...
So, it's your turn now, to carve an OpenSource Pumpkin!!!

what is "ಠ_ಠ < ( laem )"?

Should have been censor, not censure... can someone edit the title please?