<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com : Stories kicked by vivekamar</title>
    <description>Stories kicked by vivekamar</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>20 Most Interesting Silverlight Tutorials</title>
      <description>In this article we presents a collection of best Silverlight tutorials. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ajaxline.com%2f20-most-interesting-silverlight-tutorials"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ajaxline.com%2f20-most-interesting-silverlight-tutorials" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/20_Most_Interesting_Silverlight_Tutorials</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/20_Most_Interesting_Silverlight_Tutorials</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET DropDownList with Custom Paging  </title>
      <description>Very cool post that shows how to page through an ASP.NET DropDownList control as if it were a GridView control &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetcurry.com%2fShowArticle.aspx%3fID%3d341"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetcurry.com%2fShowArticle.aspx%3fID%3d341" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_DropDownList_with_Custom_Paging</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_DropDownList_with_Custom_Paging</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Treating Warnings as Errors in Visual Studio</title>
      <description>The compiler used by Visual Studio can produce errors when code cannot be built and warnings when it completes compilation successfully but there are areas of concern. To avoid warnings being missed or ignored, there is an option to treat them as errors. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.blackwasp.co.uk%2fVSWarningsAsErrors.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.blackwasp.co.uk%2fVSWarningsAsErrors.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Treating_Warnings_as_Errors_in_Visual_Studio</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Treating_Warnings_as_Errors_in_Visual_Studio</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Generate Web 2.0 applications straight from your database </title>
      <description>In today's economy, web developers everywhere are looking for a competitive edge. They need a way to produce high quality, customizable, .NET web applications fast. Check this tool that does that. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetcurry.com%2fShowArticle.aspx%3fID%3d308"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetcurry.com%2fShowArticle.aspx%3fID%3d308" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Generate_Web_2_0_applications_straight_from_your_database</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Generate_Web_2_0_applications_straight_from_your_database</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thread.Sleep is a sign of a poorly designed program.</title>
      <description>Other than for debug code, Peter details why Thread.Sleep isn't for production code. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmsmvps.com%2fblogs%2fpeterritchie%2farchive%2f2009%2f06%2f24%2f880146.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fmsmvps.com%2fblogs%2fpeterritchie%2farchive%2f2009%2f06%2f24%2f880146.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Thread_Sleep_is_a_sign_of_a_poorly_designed_program</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Thread_Sleep_is_a_sign_of_a_poorly_designed_program</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:15:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Delayed execution vs ToList() in LINQ Database Queries</title>
      <description>Should you use ToList() in your repository methods, or should you pass the iterator back to the UI to delay the execution of the query? Read on to find out why it's a bad idea to delay execution in this case. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ytechie.com%2f2009%2f06%2fdelayed-execution-vs-tolist-in-linq-database-queries.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ytechie.com%2f2009%2f06%2fdelayed-execution-vs-tolist-in-linq-database-queries.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/linq/Delayed_execution_vs_ToList_in_LINQ_Database_Queries</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/linq/Delayed_execution_vs_ToList_in_LINQ_Database_Queries</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:00:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Visual Studio 2010: Web application packaging and publishing</title>
      <description>Visual Studio 2010 has very powerful web application packaging and deployment system. When deploying your web application you create the deployment package and then publish it to web server. After configuring it is one-click action to get current version of application up to target server. Let's see how it works. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fgunnarpeipman%2farchive%2f2009%2f06%2f18%2fvisual-studio-2010-web-application-packaging-and-publishing.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fgunnarpeipman%2farchive%2f2009%2f06%2f18%2fvisual-studio-2010-web-application-packaging-and-publishing.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Visual_Studio_2010_Web_application_packaging_and_publishing</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Visual_Studio_2010_Web_application_packaging_and_publishing</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>9 Important XML Syntax Rules You Must Know</title>
      <description>XML became a W3C Recommendation on February 10, 1998. It has been amazing to see how quickly the XML standard has developed, and how quickly a large number of software vendors have adopted the standard. The syntax rules of XML are very simple and logical. The rules are easy to learn, and easy to use. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftutorialfeed.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f06%2f9-important-xml-syntax-rules-you-must.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2ftutorialfeed.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f06%2f9-important-xml-syntax-rules-you-must.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/webservices/9_Important_XML_Syntax_Rules_You_Must_Know</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/webservices/9_Important_XML_Syntax_Rules_You_Must_Know</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:50:31 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Com Interop in C# 4.0</title>
      <description>These remaining features that we'll chat about all have a strong tie to the COM world - that is, the features themselves require that the objects that you're playing with are COM objects. How do we determine that? Well, you'll soon find out! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2fsamng%2farchive%2f2009%2f06%2f16%2fcom-interop-in-c-4-0.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2fsamng%2farchive%2f2009%2f06%2f16%2fcom-interop-in-c-4-0.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Com_Interop_in_C_4_0</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Com_Interop_in_C_4_0</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:30:56 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft deprecating Oracle client in Dot Net 4</title>
      <description>Microsoft has announced through a blog that the ADO.NET 4 spec will mark the Oracle client as deprecated with plans for removal.  They are also recommending that users go to a third party Oracle provider.

Stop Helping the Competition?

Wow, this will mark the first time an ADO.NET provider has been removed from the .Net framework.  Is this a case of Microsoft trimming the fat, or pushing Oracle?  I always thought it a bit of a free ride that Microsoft was helping Oracle by building their provider for them...
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.vistadb.net%2fblog%2fpost%2f2009%2f06%2f16%2fMicrosoft-deprecating-Oracle-Client-from-ADONET-4.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.vistadb.net%2fblog%2fpost%2f2009%2f06%2f16%2fMicrosoft-deprecating-Oracle-Client-from-ADONET-4.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/Microsoft_deprecating_Oracle_client_in_Dot_Net_4</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/Microsoft_deprecating_Oracle_client_in_Dot_Net_4</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Life After Loops</title>
      <description>Eliminating cumbersome looping code using Linq &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f06%2f15%2fLife-After-Loops.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f06%2f15%2fLife-After-Loops.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Life_After_Loops</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Life_After_Loops</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The "Sim City" effect</title>
      <description>What happens when you turn your back on a software development project. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fbroloco.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f06%2fsim-city-effect_16.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fbroloco.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f06%2fsim-city-effect_16.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/The_Sim_City_effect</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/The_Sim_City_effect</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Application Pool not listed in IIS 6</title>
      <description>When recently upgrading a server from Windows 2000 to Windows Server 2003 it was noticed that the the Application Pool option was not available. After fishing around for a while it was found that IIS was running under IIS 5.0 Isolation mode &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.iismatt.com%2fIISMATT%2fpost%2f2009%2f06%2f15%2fApplication-Pool-not-listed-in-IIS-6.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.iismatt.com%2fIISMATT%2fpost%2f2009%2f06%2f15%2fApplication-Pool-not-listed-in-IIS-6.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Application_Pool_not_listed_in_IIS_6</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Application_Pool_not_listed_in_IIS_6</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:23:35 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Asp.Net vs php : Speed Comparison</title>
      <description>Why is the myth that php is faster than Asp.Net so prevalent?  Asp.Net is faster than php, here are the facts. So many times I have heard php pushers claim that php is so much faster than Asp.Net and that Asp.Net is clunky and slow. The most annoying part is that everything I have read (that is not factless opinion), and I mean everything, says that this is wrong; but for some reason, this myth is widely accepted. It has become a religious argument that ignores the facts... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fnaspinski.net%2fpost%2fAspNet-vs-php--speed-comparison.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fnaspinski.net%2fpost%2fAspNet-vs-php--speed-comparison.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Asp_Net_vs_php_Speed_Comparison</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Asp_Net_vs_php_Speed_Comparison</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Team Foundation Server 2010 - Eventing Service - Subscribing to events</title>
      <description>Visual Studio Team System exposes number of opportunities to extend its features and functionality. Responding to events published by the Team Foundation Server (TFS) is one of the extensibility opportunities which may be used most extensively. In this two part series, we will take an overview of the events raised by TFS and how to subscribe to those events. This article is an update on my earlier article which I had written for TFS 2008. This article will cover the specifics required for TFS 2010 (at this moment Beta 1) as compared to TFS 2008.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetcurry.com%2fShowArticle.aspx%3fID%3d330"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetcurry.com%2fShowArticle.aspx%3fID%3d330" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/teamsystem/Team_Foundation_Server_2010_Eventing_Service_Subscribing_to_events</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/teamsystem/Team_Foundation_Server_2010_Eventing_Service_Subscribing_to_events</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:20:16 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SubSonic 3.0: ActiveRecord</title>
      <description>Google's project site is down for a while and I have some perf tests running in the background so I thought it might be time to crank out a few more "preview" posts of SubSonic 3.0. This one's about ActiveRecord - one of my favorite patterns for its ease of use and versatility. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.wekeroad.com%2fsubsonic%2fsubsonic-30-activerecord%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.wekeroad.com%2fsubsonic%2fsubsonic-30-activerecord%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/SubSonic_3_0_ActiveRecord</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/SubSonic_3_0_ActiveRecord</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Learning new Programmming Languages and Technologies</title>
      <description>Recently, I've read article after article about how part of being a good software developer is about being open to new technologies, and to "learn new things" - and I'd be foolish not to agree. However... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fLearning-new-Programmming-Languages-and-Technologies.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fLearning-new-Programmming-Languages-and-Technologies.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Learning_new_Programmming_Languages_and_Technologies</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Learning_new_Programmming_Languages_and_Technologies</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Implementing KeyBoard Shortcuts in ASP.NET applications using jQuery </title>
      <description>Cool post on how to implement Keyboard Shortcuts in ASP.NET applications using jQuery &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetcurry.com%2fShowArticle.aspx%3fID%3d327"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetcurry.com%2fShowArticle.aspx%3fID%3d327" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/jquery/Implementing_KeyBoard_Shortcuts_in_ASP_NET_applications_using_jQuery</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/jquery/Implementing_KeyBoard_Shortcuts_in_ASP_NET_applications_using_jQuery</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 06:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>11 keystrokes that made my jQuery selector run 10x faster</title>
      <description>An in-depth analysis of the performance concerns when using a popular jQuery selector and a couple ways to dramatically speed it up, including benchmarks. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fencosia.com%2f2009%2f06%2f09%2f11-keystrokes-that-made-my-jquery-selector-run-10x-faster%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fencosia.com%2f2009%2f06%2f09%2f11-keystrokes-that-made-my-jquery-selector-run-10x-faster%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ajax/11_keystrokes_that_made_my_jQuery_selector_run_10x_faster</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ajax/11_keystrokes_that_made_my_jQuery_selector_run_10x_faster</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC Installer For Visual Studio 2010 Beta 1 And Roadmap</title>
      <description>&amp;quot;Today I'm happy to announce that we're done with the work I described and the installer is now available on CodePlex. Be sure to give it a try as many of the new VS10 features intended to support the TDD workflow fit very nicely with ASP.NET MVC, which ScottGu will describe in an upcoming blog post.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.haacked.com%2farchive%2f2009%2f06%2f09%2faspnetmvc-vs10beta1-roadmap.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.haacked.com%2farchive%2f2009%2f06%2f09%2faspnetmvc-vs10beta1-roadmap.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_MVC_Installer_For_Visual_Studio_2010_Beta_1_And_Roadmap</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_NET_MVC_Installer_For_Visual_Studio_2010_Beta_1_And_Roadmap</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Creating a Tag Cloud using ASP.NET MVC and the Entity Framework</title>
      <description>A Tag Cloud is a visual depiction of Tags or categories on a web site. CSS is used to set the variable font size of each Tag to illustrate its relative frequency or popularity within the site. As part of the migration of my site to ASP.NET MVC, I am introducing one to replace the Categories navigation that appears on the left hand side of each page, which contains a count of items within each category. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.mikesdotnetting.com%2fArticle.aspx%3fArticleID%3d107"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.mikesdotnetting.com%2fArticle.aspx%3fArticleID%3d107" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Creating_a_Tag_Cloud_using_ASP_NET_MVC_and_the_Entity_Framework</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Creating_a_Tag_Cloud_using_ASP_NET_MVC_and_the_Entity_Framework</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:45:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>15 Books You Must Have If You Are Doing ASP.NET Web Development </title>
      <description>Good books give you a quick and handy insight into a technology. You should choose books that are usually written by professionals who recommend best practices and different methods of solving a business problem using the technology. In this post, I will share some books I recommend for ASP.NET and other related Web Development technologies  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetcurry.com%2fShowArticle.aspx%3fID%3d329"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetcurry.com%2fShowArticle.aspx%3fID%3d329" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/15_Books_You_Must_Have_If_You_Are_Doing_ASP_NET_Web_Development</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/15_Books_You_Must_Have_If_You_Are_Doing_ASP_NET_Web_Development</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Handling Legacy URLs with ASP.NET MVC</title>
      <description>According to Google's Webmaster tools, there are about 15,000 incoming links to my site. 13,000 of those reference a .ASPX file on disk. When I convert to MVC, with new Search Engine Friendly urls, all those links will break unless I do something about it. Presenting users with a 404 - file not found is not an option. I need to show them the content they were expecting, and update Search Engines with the news that things have changed. Here's how I will be managing those Legacy URLs. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.mikesdotnetting.com%2fArticle.aspx%3fArticleID%3d108"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.mikesdotnetting.com%2fArticle.aspx%3fArticleID%3d108" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Handling_Legacy_URLs_with_ASP_NET_MVC</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Handling_Legacy_URLs_with_ASP_NET_MVC</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LINQ to SQL is NOT dead!</title>
      <description>Ever since Microsoft announced that the Entity Framework was their ORM of choice, people everywhere have been saying, "LINQ to SQL is dead!" A lot of people feel like they're not allowed to use LINQ to SQL anymore and that they have to use Entity Framework instead.

In fact, LINQ to SQL is not only alive and well, Microsoft has even announced LINQ to SQL improvements in .NET 4.0, including finally adding using ITable&amp;lt;T&amp;gt; for tables instead of Table&amp;lt;T&amp;gt;, which makes it much easier to test. Combine that with this open source tool that will create an IDataContext interface for you and you're on your way to testable LINQ to SQL. So no, LINQ to SQL is not dead!! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fjonkruger.com%2fblog%2f2009%2f06%2f06%2flinq-to-sql-is-not-dead%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fjonkruger.com%2fblog%2f2009%2f06%2f06%2flinq-to-sql-is-not-dead%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/linq/LINQ_to_SQL_is_NOT_dead</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/linq/LINQ_to_SQL_is_NOT_dead</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 19:00:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Refactoring: parameterize constructor</title>
      <description>In legacy code you may find classes with constructor where some objects are created and initialized. These classes are not easily testable because they depend on other classes and therefore when you unit test these classes they may also throw exceptions of classes they depend on. In these cases we can use parameterize constructor refactoring. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fgunnarpeipman%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f04%2frefactoring-parameterize-constructor.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fgunnarpeipman%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f04%2frefactoring-parameterize-constructor.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Refactoring_parameterize_constructor</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Refactoring_parameterize_constructor</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:45:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>