Joe Stagner says you could improve your ASP.NET site one tag at a time

Why not join our community?, there are 16 users online

home
visual studio
view story

DotNetKick.com is an open-source project. Please report any bugs and let us know your great suggestions. Currently running svn revision 620 (rss)

Kick Spy!, Kick Zeitgeist and Kick Widgets

26
kicks

kick it

Joe Stagner says you could improve your ASP.NET site one tag at a time

published 5 months, 3 days ago, submitted by

acyment 5 months, 3 days ago

misfitgeek.com — Microsoft's Opinionated Misfit Geek apparently took a brief look at Aggiorno, a Visual Studio plugin that does some interesting stuff, such as add alternate text to images, update deprecated attributes or fix tag structure for XHTML compliance. Come take a look!

3 comments | category:

Visual Studio | Views: 358 | Get KickIt image code

tags: VisualStudio | tag it

Everyones tags:

Your tags:

Please login or signup.

Add a live kick counter to your blog >> liveImage

You can even customize the image by choosing your own colors, and then clicking the button below to update the preview and the html code:

"Kick It" text
"Kick It" background
kick count text
kick count background
border

Simply copy and paste this HTML into your blog post.

Users who kicked this story:

acyment - fzoufaly - samiq - agilenature - alexbster - nassareno -

tiernano -

johnrummell -

Jemm -

mdopp -

gt1329a - MonroeCR - feddr - MrBaldman -

adminjew -

wisemx - dannycr07 - coolio - ashithmr -

drmohundro - joycsc - blisteringlunatic - Bognit - samdnp - bcanonica - HeyIdiot

Comments:

Looks spiffy.

posted by

wisemx 5 months, 3 days ago

I think everything was cool about this product other than this statement: "Did you know that failure to correctly declare the DOCTYPE of an (X)html Web site can lead to search engines diagnosing your Web pages as 404 (File Not Found Error)?" (http://www.aggiorno.com/why-aggiorno.aspx) In my experience that is a very false statement.

posted by

mdopp 5 months, 3 days ago

You are right. The comment needs to be rewritten. What it means is that there are cases when the source code is so broken that Google aborts the indexing of the page.

posted by fzoufaly 4 months, 16 days ago